On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 12:48:31 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/13/16 12:45 PM, wrote:

Why not? Are women more predisposed to wanting a bigger government
that imposes more on their rights and takes more of their money?
Do they want an interventionist government that sends their kids off
to war or throws them in jail for having a joint in their sock?
Do they want to keep paying ~$20,000 a year (per pupil) for government
schools that do not actually educate their kids? Do they want another
4 years of a government that is the hand maiden of Wall Street and the
bankers?

Government will always be the tool of the people who can spend
billions to (s)elect the leaders and the only way to blunt that is to
reduce the size and power of government.



I've read the Loonytarian Platform. It's a document for a far-reaching
abolition of government and the important services government provides,
especially those without significant financial resources. No thanks.

If we continue on our current path, the country will be bankrupt and
those programs will all fail.
Let Hillary or Bernie actually propose the taxes that are necessary to
support the "give aways" they promise and let's see how far they get.
It is certainly not going to be simply raising the taxes on 1% of the
people and leaving everyone else unscathed.
The Libertarians are the only ones proposing serious cuts in DoD and
trying to get the entitlements under control.
The democrats do not even want to tell us how much trouble we are in.
They ignore things like, we are spending over 100% of revenue on
entitlements and interest on the debt. Everything else is borrowed
money or money the fed prints out of thin air. If the rest of the
world was not in worse shape than us, we would be called on it but we
are all just whistling through the grave yard. This can not continue
and a world financial collapse is the only possible result if we do
not get our financial house in order. Compared to this debt bubble,
2009 was a firecracker and we are looking at an A bomb. (maybe more
literally than we want to admit).

Justan Olphart wrote:
On 6/13/2016 1:53 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 19:49:46 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/12/16 6:58 PM, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 6/12/2016 6:11 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
In responding to the horror in Orlando, the Trump Pig
thanked his followers for the "congrats" for talking about his
fears of
terrorism.

His opponent, Mrs. Clinton, expressed solidarity with the victims.


Solidarity? Is she a homosexual?

It's no surprise that an uneducated, semi-literate, right-wing piece of
**** like you lacks emotional empathy.

Hillary is just gushing with joy because now her anti gun agenda has
something to bitch about.
They want to call this a gun problem, not a terror problem and she
will milk this cow on all 4 tits.
All I would ask is how much damage would a couple of Boston style
bombs do in that crowd?

Probably no more than this Isis wannabe was able to accomplish. Too
bad there weren't any guns in the building. The death toll could have
been much less if he was cut down sooner.

You can carry in a bar, among other places. At 2 AM I'm not sure it
would have been that effective anyway.

On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:51:11 -0400, wrote:

This is a debt bubble, there are plenty of economists who agree with
that and it is only pollyanna politicians who want to borrow more
money, give it away for votes and create more debt who disagree.

===

And when it blows up they will look around and find out there are no
more bullets in the gun.

Alex wrote:
Justan Olphart wrote:
On 6/13/2016 1:53 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 19:49:46 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/12/16 6:58 PM, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 6/12/2016 6:11 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
In responding to the horror in Orlando, the Trump Pig
thanked his followers for the "congrats" for talking about his
fears of
terrorism.

His opponent, Mrs. Clinton, expressed solidarity with the victims.


Solidarity? Is she a homosexual?

It's no surprise that an uneducated, semi-literate, right-wing piece of
**** like you lacks emotional empathy.

Hillary is just gushing with joy because now her anti gun agenda has
something to bitch about.
They want to call this a gun problem, not a terror problem and she
will milk this cow on all 4 tits.
All I would ask is how much damage would a couple of Boston style
bombs do in that crowd?

Probably no more than this Isis wannabe was able to accomplish. Too
bad there weren't any guns in the building. The death toll could have
been much less if he was cut down sooner.

You can carry in a bar, among other places. At 2 AM I'm not sure it
would have been that effective anyway.


Depends on the state. I know AZ bans carry in alcohol service places, I
think Texas also. But laws against, do not seem to help. There is a law
against committing murder, even 50 murders. Helped?

On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:26:10 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:51:11 -0400, wrote:

This is a debt bubble, there are plenty of economists who agree with
that and it is only pollyanna politicians who want to borrow more
money, give it away for votes and create more debt who disagree.

===

And when it blows up they will look around and find out there are no
more bullets in the gun.

The Pimco guy was on Charlie Rose saying that exact thing. There are a
few central bankers who agree with him. This was brought out when they
said they could not service the debt if we could not raise the debt
limit. There is something seriously wrong with that thinking.

On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:26:35 -0500, Califbill
wrote:


Depends on the state. I know AZ bans carry in alcohol service places, I
think Texas also. But laws against, do not seem to help. There is a law
against committing murder, even 50 murders. Helped?

Fla statute 790.06 License to carry concealed weapon or firearm.—
(12) No license issued pursuant to this section shall authorize any
person to carry a concealed weapon or firearm into ...
... any portion of an establishment licensed to dispense alcoholic
beverages for consumption on the premises, which portion of the
establishment is primarily devoted to such purpose; ..

On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 23:05:02 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:26:35 -0500, Califbill
wrote:


Depends on the state. I know AZ bans carry in alcohol service places, I
think Texas also. But laws against, do not seem to help. There is a law
against committing murder, even 50 murders. Helped?

Fla statute 790.06 License to carry concealed weapon or firearm.—
(12) No license issued pursuant to this section shall authorize any
person to carry a concealed weapon or firearm into ...
... any portion of an establishment licensed to dispense alcoholic
beverages for consumption on the premises, which portion of the
establishment is primarily devoted to such purpose; ..

So only the outlaws will have guns.

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 23:05:02 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:26:35 -0500, Califbill
wrote:


Depends on the state. I know AZ bans carry in alcohol service places, I
think Texas also. But laws against, do not seem to help. There is a law
against committing murder, even 50 murders. Helped?

Fla statute 790.06 License to carry concealed weapon or firearm.—
(12) No license issued pursuant to this section shall authorize any
person to carry a concealed weapon or firearm into ...
... any portion of an establishment licensed to dispense alcoholic
beverages for consumption on the premises, which portion of the
establishment is primarily devoted to such purpose; ..

So only the outlaws will have guns.


The guy who came up its that saying as my NRA instructor. I was 12 years
old, so a long, long time ago.

Califbill wrote:
Alex wrote:
Justan Olphart wrote:
On 6/13/2016 1:53 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 19:49:46 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/12/16 6:58 PM, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 6/12/2016 6:11 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
In responding to the horror in Orlando, the Trump Pig
thanked his followers for the "congrats" for talking about his
fears of
terrorism.

His opponent, Mrs. Clinton, expressed solidarity with the victims.


Solidarity? Is she a homosexual?
It's no surprise that an uneducated, semi-literate, right-wing piece of
**** like you lacks emotional empathy.
Hillary is just gushing with joy because now her anti gun agenda has
something to bitch about.
They want to call this a gun problem, not a terror problem and she
will milk this cow on all 4 tits.
All I would ask is how much damage would a couple of Boston style
bombs do in that crowd?

Probably no more than this Isis wannabe was able to accomplish. Too
bad there weren't any guns in the building. The death toll could have
been much less if he was cut down sooner.
You can carry in a bar, among other places. At 2 AM I'm not sure it
would have been that effective anyway.

Depends on the state. I know AZ bans carry in alcohol service places, I
think Texas also. But laws against, do not seem to help. There is a law
against committing murder, even 50 murders. Helped?


I meant to type "can't". Sporting events and concerts are also off-limits.

On Sunday, June 12, 2016 at 6:11:25 PM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
In responding to the horror in Orlando, the Trump Pig
thanked his followers for the "congrats" for talking about his fears of
terrorism.

His opponent, Mrs. Clinton, expressed solidarity with the victims.

Wait till the Muzz-Rats start invading Delaware. Herr Krause wont know what to do. Maybe they'll rape his Wife........