On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 13:50:28 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

Americans used to be regular participants in our annual Military Tattoo but haven't been here the last 20 years.

My gosh, you learned how to spell. Congratulations!

On Tue, 05 Jul 2016 11:11:33 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

How many of those visits are because a cruise ship, not registered
American, can not start a cruise and end a cruise in the USA without a
foreign stop? Maybe is the easiest place to do a foreign stopover.

That is certainly why there are so many cruises to the Bahamas.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 12:11 PM, Califbill wrote:
justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message:
Americans used to be regular participants in our annual Military Tattoo
but haven't been here the last 20 years.


Maybe because it costs too much to visit and the good old USA has
everything Canada has to offer and more.

How many of those visits are because a cruise ship, not registered
American, can not start a cruise and end a cruise in the USA without a
foreign stop? Maybe is the easiest place to do a foreign stopover.



Perhaps those ships were going to stop at FlaJim's house, but...the
stench was just too...too.


Brain fart. Florida is USA, the ship has to stop outside the USA at least
once.

On 7/5/16 2:21 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 12:11 PM, Califbill wrote:
justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message:
Americans used to be regular participants in our annual Military Tattoo
but haven't been here the last 20 years.


Maybe because it costs too much to visit and the good old USA has
everything Canada has to offer and more.

How many of those visits are because a cruise ship, not registered
American, can not start a cruise and end a cruise in the USA without a
foreign stop? Maybe is the easiest place to do a foreign stopover.



Perhaps those ships were going to stop at FlaJim's house, but...the
stench was just too...too.


Brain fart. Florida is USA, the ship has to stop outside the USA at least
once.


Oh, right, Bilious...d'oh.

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:11:30 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


Oh, right, Bilious...d'oh.

Do you just have these insults on a macro key and pop them out like
letters from your senator?
A lot of time they have nothing to do with what you were supposed to
be responding to.
Perhaps you should turn off the quoting in your news reader if you are
not going to be responding to the post and just blurting out off topic
attacks.

On 7/5/16 4:32 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:11:30 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


Oh, right, Bilious...d'oh.

Do you just have these insults on a macro key and pop them out like
letters from your senator?
A lot of time they have nothing to do with what you were supposed to
be responding to.
Perhaps you should turn off the quoting in your news reader if you are
not going to be responding to the post and just blurting out off topic
attacks.



I don't see any reason to respond to idiocy, and the post from Bilious
was idiotic.

3:36 PMKeyser Söze
- hide quoted text -
On 7/5/16 4:32 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:11:30 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


Oh, right, Bilious...d'oh.

Do you just have these insults on a macro key and pop them out like
letters from your senator?
A lot of time they have nothing to do with what you were supposed to
be responding to.
Perhaps you should turn off the quoting in your news reader if you are
not going to be responding to the post and just blurting out off topic
attacks.



I don't see any reason to respond to idiocy, and the post from Bilious
was idiotic.
....

Then why did you respond to him?

On 7/5/16 4:51 PM, Tim wrote:
3:36 PMKeyser Söze
- hide quoted text -
On 7/5/16 4:32 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:11:30 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


Oh, right, Bilious...d'oh.

Do you just have these insults on a macro key and pop them out like
letters from your senator?
A lot of time they have nothing to do with what you were supposed to
be responding to.
Perhaps you should turn off the quoting in your news reader if you are
not going to be responding to the post and just blurting out off topic
attacks.



I don't see any reason to respond to idiocy, and the post from Bilious
was idiotic.
...

Then why did you respond to him?



I didn't respond...I gave him a "d'oh" for his ongoing stupidity.

5:52 PMKeyser Söze
- hide quoted text -
On 7/5/16 4:51 PM, Tim wrote:
3:36 PMKeyser Söze
- hide quoted text -
On 7/5/16 4:32 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:11:30 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


Oh, right, Bilious...d'oh.

Do you just have these insults on a macro key and pop them out like
letters from your senator?
A lot of time they have nothing to do with what you were supposed to
be responding to.
Perhaps you should turn off the quoting in your news reader if you are
not going to be responding to the post and just blurting out off topic
attacks.



I don't see any reason to respond to idiocy, and the post from Bilious
was idiotic.
...

Then why did you respond to him?



I didn't respond...I gave him a "d'oh" for his ongoing stupidity.
.....

Yes, among with more commentary directed to him as well. And that was a response

Tim wrote:

5:52 PMKeyser Söze
- hide quoted text -
On 7/5/16 4:51 PM, Tim wrote:
3:36 PMKeyser Söze
- hide quoted text -
On 7/5/16 4:32 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:11:30 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


Oh, right, Bilious...d'oh.

Do you just have these insults on a macro key and pop them out like
letters from your senator?
A lot of time they have nothing to do with what you were supposed to
be responding to.
Perhaps you should turn off the quoting in your news reader if you are
not going to be responding to the post and just blurting out off topic
attacks.



I don't see any reason to respond to idiocy, and the post from Bilious
was idiotic.
...

Then why did you respond to him?



I didn't respond...I gave him a "d'oh" for his ongoing stupidity.
....

Yes, among with more commentary directed to him as well. And that was a response


Are you competing with John the racist in determining what is and what
isn't?

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+