On 7/5/16 12:08 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
On 7/5/16 11:37 AM, justan wrote:
Wrote in message:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?


Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing
sinister there, right?



Do you have specifics to offer aside from the drool running down your
chin onto your bib?


Seemed specific enough to me. You know how talented at making evidence
disappear those Clintoons are.


Seems specific to you because you are a moron and you support, puke, Trump.

Its Me Wrote in message:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 11:37:59 AM UTC-4, justan wrote:
Wrote in message:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?


Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing
sinister there, right?
--
x

"As the New York Times reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, ?a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities ? is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,? according to the newspaper.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), now a declared presidential candidate, said the book contains ?big news? that will ?shock people? and make voters ?question? Mrs. Clinton?s candidacy. The volume ?asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton?s State Department in return,? the Times reports.

?We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,? Schweizer writes."

Hilly is a corporate and political whore.


My guess is that Trump will end up running unopposed. Has there
been a president for that possibility?
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

On 7/5/16 12:13 PM, justan wrote:
Its Me Wrote in message:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 11:37:59 AM UTC-4, justan wrote:
Wrote in message:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?


Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing
sinister there, right?
--
x

"As the New York Times reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, ?a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities ? is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,? according to the newspaper.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), now a declared presidential candidate, said the book contains ?big news? that will ?shock people? and make voters ?question? Mrs. Clinton?s candidacy. The volume ?asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton?s State Department in return,? the Times reports.

?We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,? Schweizer writes."

Hilly is a corporate and political whore.


My guess is that Trump will end up running unopposed. Has there
been a president for that possibility?



Your guess and $10 will get you a cup of coffee at Starbucks. You have
to pay extra because of your utter stupidity.

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 11:35:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/5/16 11:32 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?


D'uh. Obviously, the answer is to disqualify from seeking office anyone
who has ever had any corporate ties or even contributions from
corporations.

You certainly should be questioning $750,000 honorariums for a man
who's wife is the SoS and the corporation is doing international
business that State is signing off on. The Saudis have funneled
millions into super pacs that endorse here. It is "hold your nose"
legal but certainly should raise red flags.
If anyone but Trump was running against her, she would be deader than
disco.
Comey just came out today and said "Scty Clinton was "extremely
careless in handling highly classified information", "Information was
properly classified as 'top secret, special access only' at the time
it discussed on E-mail". He pointed out that her server was not even
as secure as G-mail.
"It is possible that hostile actors gained evidence to her E-mail
account"
He went on to say they found a ****load of undisclosed "work related"
E-mails that were not turned over and that they made an intentional
effort to wipe as many devices clean as they could. Unlike commercial
"private" E-mail servers, nothing was archived. If they deleted an
Email and it was not still spinning in the slack space of the drive,
it was gone forever.
Conclusion "there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes"
He went on to say criminal prosecutions for these things is not likely
BUT that there are generally "administrative sanctions".
She may not be prosecuted at this time but the FBI calls her
"extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly
classified information"

That doesn't sound very presidential to me.

I think they should put all the dice back in the cup at BOTH
conventions and find 2 new candidates,

Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
On 7/5/16 12:13 PM, justan wrote:
Its Me Wrote in message:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 11:37:59 AM UTC-4, justan wrote:
Wrote in message:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?


Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing
sinister there, right?
--
x

"As the New York Times reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, ?a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities ? is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,? according to the newspaper.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), now a declared presidential candidate, said the book contains ?big news? that will ?shock people? and make voters ?question? Mrs. Clinton?s candidacy. The volume ?asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton?s State Department in return,? the Times reports.

?We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,? Schweizer writes."

Hilly is a corporate and political whore.


My guess is that Trump will end up running unopposed. Has there
been a president for that possibility?



Your guess and $10 will get you a cup of coffee at Starbucks. You have
to pay extra because of your utter stupidity.
Did I say that? How utterly moronic of me.

Yup
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 11:42:42 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing
sinister there, right?



Do you have specifics to offer

I imagine they will be saving that for the end of the summer. There is
plenty of smoke, but we have not seen the fire yet.

On 7/5/16 12:20 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 11:35:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/5/16 11:32 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?


D'uh. Obviously, the answer is to disqualify from seeking office anyone
who has ever had any corporate ties or even contributions from
corporations.

You certainly should be questioning $750,000 honorariums for a man
who's wife is the SoS and the corporation is doing international
business that State is signing off on. The Saudis have funneled
millions into super pacs that endorse here. It is "hold your nose"
legal but certainly should raise red flags.
If anyone but Trump was running against her, she would be deader than
disco.
Comey just came out today and said "Scty Clinton was "extremely
careless in handling highly classified information", "Information was
properly classified as 'top secret, special access only' at the time
it discussed on E-mail". He pointed out that her server was not even
as secure as G-mail.
"It is possible that hostile actors gained evidence to her E-mail
account"
He went on to say they found a ****load of undisclosed "work related"
E-mails that were not turned over and that they made an intentional
effort to wipe as many devices clean as they could. Unlike commercial
"private" E-mail servers, nothing was archived. If they deleted an
Email and it was not still spinning in the slack space of the drive,
it was gone forever.
Conclusion "there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes"
He went on to say criminal prosecutions for these things is not likely
BUT that there are generally "administrative sanctions".
She may not be prosecuted at this time but the FBI calls her
"extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly
classified information"

That doesn't sound very presidential to me.

I think they should put all the dice back in the cup at BOTH
conventions and find 2 new candidates,


There will be no indictment, but you can still hope for one charging
Hillary with planning and directing the multiple shooters on the grassy
knoll back in Dallas in 1963.

On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 12:08:33 PM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 12:05 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 11:37:59 AM UTC-4, justan wrote:
Wrote in message:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?


Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing
sinister there, right?
--
x

"As the New York Times reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, “a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities — is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,� according to the newspaper.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), now a declared presidential candidate, said the book contains “big news� that will “shock people� and make voters “question� Mrs. Clinton’s candidacy. The volume “asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department in return,� the Times reports.

“We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,� Schweizer writes."

Hilly is a corporate and political whore.



Rand Paul? The loonytarian is offering up an opinion? Hehehe. And you
boys have Donald Trump.

"As the *New York Times* reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, “a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities — is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,� according to the newspaper."

Hehe is right.

On 7/5/16 12:22 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 11:42:42 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing
sinister there, right?



Do you have specifics to offer

I imagine they will be saving that for the end of the summer. There is
plenty of smoke, but we have not seen the fire yet.


Who? The Trumpsters? Will they be issuing it on letterhead from the
White Knights of the Jew Haters of America?

On 7/5/16 12:26 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 12:08:33 PM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 12:05 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 11:37:59 AM UTC-4, justan wrote:
Wrote in message:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?


Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing
sinister there, right?
--
x

"As the New York Times reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, “a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities — is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,� according to the newspaper.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), now a declared presidential candidate, said the book contains “big news� that will “shock people� and make voters “question� Mrs. Clinton’s candidacy. The volume “asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department in return,� the Times reports.

“We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,� Schweizer writes."

Hilly is a corporate and political whore.



Rand Paul? The loonytarian is offering up an opinion? Hehehe. And you
boys have Donald Trump.

"As the *New York Times* reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, “a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities — is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,� according to the newspaper."

Hehe is right.



The book is scheduled to be published May 5. That was May 5, more than a
year ago. The book was criticized for being a screed full of bull****,
and, in fact, after it was published, a half dozen or more passages in
it were pulled because they were bull****.

Have nice day, Trumpster.