http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

I confess o haven't read the article but Haven't the Clintons always had corporate ties?

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 06:49:18 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

I confess o haven't read the article but Haven't the Clintons always had corporate ties?

She was on the Board of Walmart ... when they stopped being "America's
store" and became the China outlet mall.
She also worked for the law firm that represented Tyson Foods and
Walmart, among other companies in the south.
If she was a republican, there may have been conflict of interest
problem since she was representing companies doing business in
Arkansas, while Bill was the governor. The rules seem to be different
for democrats.

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?

On 7/5/16 11:32 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?


D'uh. Obviously, the answer is to disqualify from seeking office anyone
who has ever had any corporate ties or even contributions from
corporations.

Wrote in message:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?


Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing
sinister there, right?
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

On 7/5/16 11:37 AM, justan wrote:
Wrote in message:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?


Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing
sinister there, right?



Do you have specifics to offer aside from the drool running down your
chin onto your bib?

On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 11:37:59 AM UTC-4, justan wrote:
Wrote in message:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?


Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing
sinister there, right?
--
x

"As the New York Times reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, “a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities — is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,� according to the newspaper.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), now a declared presidential candidate, said the book contains “big news� that will “shock people� and make voters “question� Mrs. Clinton’s candidacy. The volume “asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department in return,� the Times reports.

“We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,� Schweizer writes."

Hilly is a corporate and political whore.

Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
On 7/5/16 11:37 AM, justan wrote:
Wrote in message:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?


Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing
sinister there, right?



Do you have specifics to offer aside from the drool running down your
chin onto your bib?


Seemed specific enough to me. You know how talented at making evidence
disappear those Clintoons are.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

On 7/5/16 12:05 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 11:37:59 AM UTC-4, justan wrote:
Wrote in message:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?


Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing
sinister there, right?
--
x

"As the New York Times reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, “a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities — is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,� according to the newspaper.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), now a declared presidential candidate, said the book contains “big news� that will “shock people� and make voters “question� Mrs. Clinton’s candidacy. The volume “asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department in return,� the Times reports.

“We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,� Schweizer writes."

Hilly is a corporate and political whore.



Rand Paul? The loonytarian is offering up an opinion? Hehehe. And you
boys have Donald Trump.