On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:37:21 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 7/22/16 4:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:24:43 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Gays are normal people.

It depends on the gay person. I know some who are very normal, I have
also met plenty who were flaming fags and they would be the first ones
to say it.
The guy who worked for my wife, until he went to jail (DUI and
"driving after") looked and acted like a guy you would meet in a duck
blind or a construction job. Even my wife, who has very good "gaydar",
did not believe he was gay until she met his partner.



Wait...*you* are defining "normal"? Are you posing as John Herring, the
self-appointed guy in charge of...nothing?

If you think a guy walking down the street wearing ass chaps is
"normal" you live in a strange place.


I'M sure I see less of that than you do. On the other hand, I saw
someone wearing a Trump button today. Strange, obviously stupid guy.

I have to go to Key West to see that but I think it is far from
normal. That was the point that you dodged.
I am not the one who defined that, society did.

BTW have you seen Michael Moore lately?
He says he thinks Trump is going to win.
I suppose he hopes that is a self fulfilling prophecy because, with a
democrat in the White House, he has a hard time making a living
without ****ing off his base.
He does make a compelling case, scary as that is. The short answer is
****ed off white guys vote. Women, gays, blacks and latinos tend to
have better things to do, particularly when their choice is a neocon
person with a bad history on the issues they care about.

Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
On 7/22/16 4:14 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 15:01:20 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:


Have you ever come to a conclusion on your own? The unions and D N
C own you.

Harry has his opinion as soon as Rachel Maddow or Chris Matthews gives
it to him.


Yet more stupidity and incorrect conclusion-reaching.


Sounds like satire to me.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:19:50 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/22/16 4:14 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 15:01:20 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:


Have you ever come to a conclusion on your own? The unions and D N
C own you.

Harry has his opinion as soon as Rachel Maddow or Chris Matthews gives
it to him.


Yet more stupidity and incorrect conclusion-reaching.

....but true.

On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:40:47 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/22/16 1:07 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:40:35 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:


I've lost track of the alphabet soup of letters that describe the
different kinds of gay people. It's really not important but it
would be nice if someone would explain it all.

It took me a while to get my head around all of the variations of men
in women's clothes. Fortunately (for the process) there were lots of
gay people in the flower business and the home decor business (things
my wife did before she got into HVAC and construction).
It was an interesting intellectual exercise but I was happy to be
around normal people again. Some of the gay guys were regular folks
but some were crazy as a ****house rat.
I spent more time that I wanted to with the various iterations of
"gay". It turns out, most men in dresses are not even gay ... if you
can believe what they say. That makes them in the ladies room even
more troubling.



Gays are normal people.

Whether Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transsexual (or Transvestite), Queer,
Zoophile, or Pedophile, they are normal people. Why do you not include all the others?

On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:24:43 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/22/16 4:12 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:40:47 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 7/22/16 1:07 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:40:35 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:


I've lost track of the alphabet soup of letters that describe the
different kinds of gay people. It's really not important but it
would be nice if someone would explain it all.

It took me a while to get my head around all of the variations of men
in women's clothes. Fortunately (for the process) there were lots of
gay people in the flower business and the home decor business (things
my wife did before she got into HVAC and construction).
It was an interesting intellectual exercise but I was happy to be
around normal people again. Some of the gay guys were regular folks
but some were crazy as a ****house rat.
I spent more time that I wanted to with the various iterations of
"gay". It turns out, most men in dresses are not even gay ... if you
can believe what they say. That makes them in the ladies room even
more troubling.



Gays are normal people.

It depends on the gay person. I know some who are very normal, I have
also met plenty who were flaming fags and they would be the first ones
to say it.
The guy who worked for my wife, until he went to jail (DUI and
"driving after") looked and acted like a guy you would meet in a duck
blind or a construction job. Even my wife, who has very good "gaydar",
did not believe he was gay until she met his partner.



Wait...*you* are defining "normal"? Are you posing as John Herring, the
self-appointed guy in charge of...nothing?

*You* are the one who defined 'normal' with your 'gays are normal' comment.

On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 15:49:02 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/22/16 3:13 PM, justan wrote:
Poquito Loco Wrote in message:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:40:35 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:

Poquito Loco Wrote in message:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 05:45:51 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:


StinkyJim farts...

"Progressives need to push for demolishing all multi stall
bathrooms and replaceing them with individual lockable bathrooms
so the gays and libs can shoot up in privacy. Might even borrow
the handicap parking only idea and designate gay only and not
sure only privileged pottys."


Boy, you demand a lot for yourself and your buddies.

Actually, the solution is good for the GLBTZP crowd also.


I've lost track of the alphabet soup of letters that describe the
different kinds of gay people. It's really not important but it
would be nice if someone would explain it all.

Well, I accidentally left off the 'Q', which stands for 'queer' and is a PC term.

The rest, in order, a Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transsexual (or Transvestite, not sure which),
Zoophile, and Pedophile. None of those are 'sexual disorders' but are normal behaviors of those born
with such an inclination, i.e., they are 'natural' states of being.

I hope that didn't offend anybody.


Other than the alphabet
soup folks and Harry Louse, probably not.



He forgot the "J" for JustanAssholePhile.

Is that also 'normal behavior'?

On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:07:11 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:18:09 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:40:35 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:

Poquito Loco Wrote in message:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 05:45:51 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:


StinkyJim farts...

"Progressives need to push for demolishing all multi stall
bathrooms and replaceing them with individual lockable bathrooms
so the gays and libs can shoot up in privacy. Might even borrow
the handicap parking only idea and designate gay only and not
sure only privileged pottys."


Boy, you demand a lot for yourself and your buddies.

Actually, the solution is good for the GLBTZP crowd also.


I've lost track of the alphabet soup of letters that describe the
different kinds of gay people. It's really not important but it
would be nice if someone would explain it all.

Well, I accidentally left off the 'Q', which stands for 'queer' and is a PC term.

The rest, in order, a Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transsexual (or Transvestite, not sure which),
Zoophile, and Pedophile. None of those are 'sexual disorders' but are normal behaviors of those born
with such an inclination, i.e., they are 'natural' states of being.

I hope that didn't offend anybody.

"T" is currently "trans gender" but these things tend to change over
time. It used to be "trans sexual". (a person who actually believes
they were misassigned at birth)
Transvestite is a whole different shade of pink, typically a
homosexual who dresses to attract men for fun or profit. Cross
dressers are generally straight men who just like to dress like women.

At least that was what it was a while ago when we knew gay folks who
could explain these things.

Actually, it should be 'T*3', 'cause I can't put an exponent on the 'T' in Agent. I'm thinking the
abbreviation (acronym?) should be 'GLBTTTQZP' and pronounced 'glibitcuezip'. That should cover it
and be politically correct.

On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:20:46 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:18:09 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

The rest, in order, a Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transsexual

Since we are still talking about marriage equality, it is the
bisexuals who are being discriminated against now.
They should be allowed to have a husband and a wife if we are being
fair. Otherwise we are forcing them to deny their natural state or
they will have to seek relationships outside of their marriage and
that is unfair.
I know that sounds strange right now but not any stranger than 2 men
being married 8 years ago (when Hillary was against it) or men being
allowed in the ladies room 4 years ago when nobody would have
supported it.

Can't argue with that!

On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:51:16 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:26:11 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:21:09 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

I usually don't try to reach a conclusion in a presentation on the basis
of one data point, especially one that was offered as an example of
irony and satire.

No you simply become offended when you are presented with satire.


No, I don't. Wait...you post satire?

Not often, I prefer facts but other people do and you call them
racist. You even call facts racist if you do not like the conclusion
they present.

===

Damn those racist facts!

Yup. I was funny watching the panel from NPR fact checking the Trump
speech when they got to the claim about the spike of violent crime in
the big cities. They started by saying that overall crime is down,
then almost as a second thought they acknowledged that yes crime is
bad in the black neighborhoods in the large cities, ignoring that
Trump was talking about that exact thing.
They also had to quibble about their contention that the line about
more cops being killed this year saying it was only 21% and then when
they narrowed it down to "being shot" it wasn't 43% more, it was 78%
more.
People do not realize, most cops killed in the line, die in traffic
accidents and they are changing their road side procedures (notice
these days the cop stops on the grass side of your car now, not
partially on the road side) along with lighting their cars up like a
Vegas casino. THAT is the number that is coming down.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/22/16 1:07 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:40:35 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:


I've lost track of the alphabet soup of letters that describe the
different kinds of gay people. It's really not important but it
would be nice if someone would explain it all.

It took me a while to get my head around all of the variations of men
in women's clothes. Fortunately (for the process) there were lots of
gay people in the flower business and the home decor business (things
my wife did before she got into HVAC and construction).
It was an interesting intellectual exercise but I was happy to be
around normal people again. Some of the gay guys were regular folks
but some were crazy as a ****house rat.
I spent more time that I wanted to with the various iterations of
"gay". It turns out, most men in dresses are not even gay ... if you
can believe what they say. That makes them in the ladies room even
more troubling.



Gays are