On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 15:39:10 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

As for what Hillary might or might not do, my opinion of that is far
different from yours. I don't like the big money in politics, but it is
there, and until Citizens United is trashed or other efforts to really
control it are taken, it'll be a big factor in the game.

The wikileaks releases say what Hillary wants to do., They are going
to give the heavy hitter donors government appointments. I don't
remember citizens united talking about that.

On Monday, July 25, 2016 at 4:24:40 PM UTC-4, justan wrote:
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
On 7/25/16 11:19 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 06:25:45 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 7/25/16 12:53 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 20:21:27 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 7/24/16 2:36 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 14:08:47 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Billionaire media mogul Michael Bloomberg will endorse Hillary Clinton

Not shocking. Wall street banksters stick together. The only thing
that makes him a Republican beyond that is his neocon stance on the
middle east wars. They all think you should turn in your mini-14


My guess is that Bloomberg is well-aware of the international and
national horrors of a Donald Trump as a POTUS. Like most of his
supporters, Trump is an ignorant, intellectually lazy bigot.

So are you admitting Hillary is a neocon friend of the banksters and
you only like her because she isn't trump? That is the thinking that
got us the other 4 Bushes.

I don't know what drugs you are taking, but perhaps it is time to change
them. I made a guess about Bloomberg's thinking, nothing more. I believe
Bloomberg thinks Trump is a dangerous crackpot, and that outweighs
whatever his feelings are about Clinton. You really look foolish jumping
to your wild conclusions about my politics.

So you are just in denial ... OK
I just do not want to hear you ****ing and moaning about the banksters
raping the world and the US being dragged into more wars when Hillary
gets elected.


I'm not in denial...I posted that Bloomberg is supporting Clinton
because Trump is a horror story.

As I have stated previously many times, just because I support a
candidate doesn't mean I agree with that candidate on every significant
issue. I never have and I don't expect to in the future.

There are two candidates running with a chance of winning...Clinton and
Trump. Trump is a disaster on just about everything.

Why is your candidate being in a banksters pocket OK with you.
Isn't antibanksterism one of your core values?

With harry, being associated with bankers, corporations, or even crime is only bad if there's an R after your name. With Dims it's all forgiven.

On Monday, July 25, 2016 at 4:50:35 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 15:39:10 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

As for what Hillary might or might not do, my opinion of that is far
different from yours. I don't like the big money in politics, but it is
there, and until Citizens United is trashed or other efforts to really
control it are taken, it'll be a big factor in the game.

The wikileaks releases say what Hillary wants to do., They are going
to give the heavy hitter donors government appointments. I don't
remember citizens united talking about that.

Hilly selling out our government for her own benefit? Why, that's her modus operandi.

"Bloomberg to Endorse Clinton"

That's nice...