| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#62
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Michael Moore
On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 3:06:22 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:51:50 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/27/16 12:56 AM, wrote: On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:05:58 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/26/16 8:58 PM, wrote: On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:59:57 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: Getting everything set for the "Debate Party" tonight...food, drink, extra chairs, et cetera. We "signed on" for 25, but I'm guessing about 15, starting to arrive any minute now. Arranged in a circle? insert joke here We ended up with 23 peeps, and the last couple just left. The secret is to NOT serve booze at these gatherings. One of our guests suggested that Trump was on cocaine. We had seven Republicans here, and five of them said they were "very disappointed" with Trump's performance. I'm wondering if Trump will show up for the next two debates. We turned it off after about 15 minutes. Too bad you were not interested enough in the future of this country to watch the next POTUS. You would have seen Trump interrupt Clinton about 50 times, sniff as if he were on cocaine, exhibit his almost total ignorance about our laws or international, act like a spoiled child, and avoid responding to direct, simple questions. In comparison, Hillary did better than ok. Trump has hinted that in the next debate, he will bring up Bill Clinton's sexual indiscretions. That should be funny, coming from a man who has admitted a long history of cheating on wives and who has been accused of raping a 13 year old girl when he was an adult. I knew it would be repeated on TV ad nauseum. I still wonder, after watching this dumpster fire, why Johnson and Stein were excluded? Did anyone actually hear anything new from either of them? Was there anything informative said? The people who like Trump, still like Trump and the people who like Clinton, still like Clinton. If anything the undecided/neither number actually increased. Our local NBC station poll had 33% saying Clinton won, 33% saying Trump won, 3% saying it was a tie and 31% saying both lost. I am in the "both lost" camp. Clinton looked over prepared, coming in with a several dozen rehearsed lines and you could tell she was happy each time Trump teed himself up for one. Trump was totally unprepared and tried to get by just being Trump. Neither looked particularly like a leader or even particularly smart. Clinton was the better actor tho. Agreed. They both started looking tired before the end. First Trump, then Clinton. 90 minutes is a long time to stand up there and do that. Hilly has far more practice at it. |
|
#63
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Moore
On 9/27/16 3:05 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:51:50 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/27/16 12:56 AM, wrote: On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:05:58 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/26/16 8:58 PM, wrote: On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:59:57 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: Getting everything set for the "Debate Party" tonight...food, drink, extra chairs, et cetera. We "signed on" for 25, but I'm guessing about 15, starting to arrive any minute now. Arranged in a circle? insert joke here We ended up with 23 peeps, and the last couple just left. The secret is to NOT serve booze at these gatherings. One of our guests suggested that Trump was on cocaine. We had seven Republicans here, and five of them said they were "very disappointed" with Trump's performance. I'm wondering if Trump will show up for the next two debates. We turned it off after about 15 minutes. Too bad you were not interested enough in the future of this country to watch the next POTUS. You would have seen Trump interrupt Clinton about 50 times, sniff as if he were on cocaine, exhibit his almost total ignorance about our laws or international, act like a spoiled child, and avoid responding to direct, simple questions. In comparison, Hillary did better than ok. Trump has hinted that in the next debate, he will bring up Bill Clinton's sexual indiscretions. That should be funny, coming from a man who has admitted a long history of cheating on wives and who has been accused of raping a 13 year old girl when he was an adult. I knew it would be repeated on TV ad nauseum. I still wonder, after watching this dumpster fire, why Johnson and Stein were excluded? Did anyone actually hear anything new from either of them? Was there anything informative said? The people who like Trump, still like Trump and the people who like Clinton, still like Clinton. If anything the undecided/neither number actually increased. Our local NBC station poll had 33% saying Clinton won, 33% saying Trump won, 3% saying it was a tie and 31% saying both lost. I am in the "both lost" camp. Clinton looked over prepared, coming in with a several dozen rehearsed lines and you could tell she was happy each time Trump teed himself up for one. Trump was totally unprepared and tried to get by just being Trump. Neither looked particularly like a leader or even particularly smart. Clinton was the better actor tho. There already was one guy - Trump - up on the stage who demonstrated he knew nothing. Putting Johnson up there would have only doubled the number of men on the stage who knew nothing. |
|
#64
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Moore
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 9/27/16 1:59 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/27/16 12:56 AM, wrote: On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:05:58 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/26/16 8:58 PM, wrote: On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:59:57 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: Getting everything set for the "Debate Party" tonight...food, drink, extra chairs, et cetera. We "signed on" for 25, but I'm guessing about 15, starting to arrive any minute now. Arranged in a circle? insert joke here We ended up with 23 peeps, and the last couple just left. The secret is to NOT serve booze at these gatherings. One of our guests suggested that Trump was on cocaine. We had seven Republicans here, and five of them said they were "very disappointed" with Trump's performance. I'm wondering if Trump will show up for the next two debates. We turned it off after about 15 minutes. Too bad you were not interested enough in the future of this country to watch the next POTUS. You would have seen Trump interrupt Clinton about 50 times, sniff as if he were on cocaine, exhibit his almost total ignorance about our laws or international, act like a spoiled child, and avoid responding to direct, simple questions. In comparison, Hillary did better than ok. Trump has hinted that in the next debate, he will bring up Bill Clinton's sexual indiscretions. That should be funny, coming from a man who has admitted a long history of cheating on wives and who has been accused of raping a 13 year old girl when he was an adult. He was accused. So, people accuse Hillary of having Vince Foster and others offed. Accusations are easy. You know that. You accuse anybody not in lockstep with you of being a racist, or dumb. As I state, accusations are cheap. It's great that Trump has such stalwart defenders as...you. I dislike both Trump and Hillary. But a screwed up "debate". I turned it off, listened on the radio while returning from a funeral in Carmel, when they brought up the birther question! What did that have the do with policy or running the country? Only to slant the gathering. |
|
#65
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Moore
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 9/27/16 3:05 PM, wrote: On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:51:50 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/27/16 12:56 AM, wrote: On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:05:58 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/26/16 8:58 PM, wrote: On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:59:57 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: Getting everything set for the "Debate Party" tonight...food, drink, extra chairs, et cetera. We "signed on" for 25, but I'm guessing about 15, starting to arrive any minute now. Arranged in a circle? insert joke here We ended up with 23 peeps, and the last couple just left. The secret is to NOT serve booze at these gatherings. One of our guests suggested that Trump was on cocaine. We had seven Republicans here, and five of them said they were "very disappointed" with Trump's performance. I'm wondering if Trump will show up for the next two debates. We turned it off after about 15 minutes. Too bad you were not interested enough in the future of this country to watch the next POTUS. You would have seen Trump interrupt Clinton about 50 times, sniff as if he were on cocaine, exhibit his almost total ignorance about our laws or international, act like a spoiled child, and avoid responding to direct, simple questions. In comparison, Hillary did better than ok. Trump has hinted that in the next debate, he will bring up Bill Clinton's sexual indiscretions. That should be funny, coming from a man who has admitted a long history of cheating on wives and who has been accused of raping a 13 year old girl when he was an adult. I knew it would be repeated on TV ad nauseum. I still wonder, after watching this dumpster fire, why Johnson and Stein were excluded? Did anyone actually hear anything new from either of them? Was there anything informative said? The people who like Trump, still like Trump and the people who like Clinton, still like Clinton. If anything the undecided/neither number actually increased. Our local NBC station poll had 33% saying Clinton won, 33% saying Trump won, 3% saying it was a tie and 31% saying both lost. I am in the "both lost" camp. Clinton looked over prepared, coming in with a several dozen rehearsed lines and you could tell she was happy each time Trump teed himself up for one. Trump was totally unprepared and tried to get by just being Trump. Neither looked particularly like a leader or even particularly smart. Clinton was the better actor tho. There already was one guy - Trump - up on the stage who demonstrated he knew nothing. Putting Johnson up there would have only doubled the number of men on the stage who knew nothing. Then why are the DNC and RNC worried? |
|
#66
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Moore
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:34:24 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 9/27/16 3:05 PM, wrote: On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:51:50 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/27/16 12:56 AM, wrote: On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:05:58 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/26/16 8:58 PM, wrote: On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:59:57 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: Getting everything set for the "Debate Party" tonight...food, drink, extra chairs, et cetera. We "signed on" for 25, but I'm guessing about 15, starting to arrive any minute now. Arranged in a circle? insert joke here We ended up with 23 peeps, and the last couple just left. The secret is to NOT serve booze at these gatherings. One of our guests suggested that Trump was on cocaine. We had seven Republicans here, and five of them said they were "very disappointed" with Trump's performance. I'm wondering if Trump will show up for the next two debates. We turned it off after about 15 minutes. Too bad you were not interested enough in the future of this country to watch the next POTUS. You would have seen Trump interrupt Clinton about 50 times, sniff as if he were on cocaine, exhibit his almost total ignorance about our laws or international, act like a spoiled child, and avoid responding to direct, simple questions. In comparison, Hillary did better than ok. Trump has hinted that in the next debate, he will bring up Bill Clinton's sexual indiscretions. That should be funny, coming from a man who has admitted a long history of cheating on wives and who has been accused of raping a 13 year old girl when he was an adult. I knew it would be repeated on TV ad nauseum. I still wonder, after watching this dumpster fire, why Johnson and Stein were excluded? Did anyone actually hear anything new from either of them? Was there anything informative said? The people who like Trump, still like Trump and the people who like Clinton, still like Clinton. If anything the undecided/neither number actually increased. Our local NBC station poll had 33% saying Clinton won, 33% saying Trump won, 3% saying it was a tie and 31% saying both lost. I am in the "both lost" camp. Clinton looked over prepared, coming in with a several dozen rehearsed lines and you could tell she was happy each time Trump teed himself up for one. Trump was totally unprepared and tried to get by just being Trump. Neither looked particularly like a leader or even particularly smart. Clinton was the better actor tho. There already was one guy - Trump - up on the stage who demonstrated he knew nothing. Putting Johnson up there would have only doubled the number of men on the stage who knew nothing. Johnson might have asked more about how they plan to deal with debt, DoD spending, wars we don't need to be in and why we have more people in jail than any other country on the planet, either measured by total population (2.1 million) or percentage (737 per 100,000). Let the other 2 justify the drug war. That may have more impact on the futures of black and brown people than any other factor. |
|
#67
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Moore
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:51:21 -0500, Califbill
wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: There already was one guy - Trump - up on the stage who demonstrated he knew nothing. Putting Johnson up there would have only doubled the number of men on the stage who knew nothing. Then why are the DNC and RNC worried? Answered one note up |
|
#68
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Moore
On 9/27/16 4:17 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:34:24 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/27/16 3:05 PM, wrote: On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:51:50 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/27/16 12:56 AM, wrote: On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:05:58 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/26/16 8:58 PM, wrote: On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:59:57 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: Getting everything set for the "Debate Party" tonight...food, drink, extra chairs, et cetera. We "signed on" for 25, but I'm guessing about 15, starting to arrive any minute now. Arranged in a circle? insert joke here We ended up with 23 peeps, and the last couple just left. The secret is to NOT serve booze at these gatherings. One of our guests suggested that Trump was on cocaine. We had seven Republicans here, and five of them said they were "very disappointed" with Trump's performance. I'm wondering if Trump will show up for the next two debates. We turned it off after about 15 minutes. Too bad you were not interested enough in the future of this country to watch the next POTUS. You would have seen Trump interrupt Clinton about 50 times, sniff as if he were on cocaine, exhibit his almost total ignorance about our laws or international, act like a spoiled child, and avoid responding to direct, simple questions. In comparison, Hillary did better than ok. Trump has hinted that in the next debate, he will bring up Bill Clinton's sexual indiscretions. That should be funny, coming from a man who has admitted a long history of cheating on wives and who has been accused of raping a 13 year old girl when he was an adult. I knew it would be repeated on TV ad nauseum. I still wonder, after watching this dumpster fire, why Johnson and Stein were excluded? Did anyone actually hear anything new from either of them? Was there anything informative said? The people who like Trump, still like Trump and the people who like Clinton, still like Clinton. If anything the undecided/neither number actually increased. Our local NBC station poll had 33% saying Clinton won, 33% saying Trump won, 3% saying it was a tie and 31% saying both lost. I am in the "both lost" camp. Clinton looked over prepared, coming in with a several dozen rehearsed lines and you could tell she was happy each time Trump teed himself up for one. Trump was totally unprepared and tried to get by just being Trump. Neither looked particularly like a leader or even particularly smart. Clinton was the better actor tho. There already was one guy - Trump - up on the stage who demonstrated he knew nothing. Putting Johnson up there would have only doubled the number of men on the stage who knew nothing. Johnson might have asked more about how they plan to deal with debt, DoD spending, wars we don't need to be in and why we have more people in jail than any other country on the planet, either measured by total population (2.1 million) or percentage (737 per 100,000). Let the other 2 justify the drug war. That may have more impact on the futures of black and brown people than any other factor. It's easy to ask questions. It's more difficult to provide answers. I've checked the Libertarian page a few times, and there is nothing there in any details, and in the seven times I've now seen him interviewed, he never offers any details. I've seen Hillary many times explain some of her proposals in great detail. I think there is a lot less to Johnson than meets the eye. Nice guy, though, but he should cut back on the marijuana so that he can keep pace with current events. |
|
#69
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Moore
|
|
#70
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Moore
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 16:23:04 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 9/27/16 4:18 PM, wrote: On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:51:21 -0500, Califbill wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: There already was one guy - Trump - up on the stage who demonstrated he knew nothing. Putting Johnson up there would have only doubled the number of men on the stage who knew nothing. Then why are the DNC and RNC worried? Answered one note up My only concern is that Johnson might suck down enough votes in a hotly contested state to toss the election into the U.S. House, where the Repugnants pick the next POTUS. No thanks. === In my opinion that's the best possible outcome. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Michael Moore would be proud... | General | |||
| OT Michael Moore proves he is the sicko | ASA | |||
| Michael Moore speaks the truth! | ASA | |||
| US Military Wants Michael Moore Film | ASA | |||
| Don't go and see Michael Moore!!! | ASA | |||
Linear Mode
