| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#32
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
One thing about Harry
On 11/22/16 6:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/22/2016 2:14 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 2:04 PM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 1:51:57 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 1:22 PM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 11:10 AM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 9:48 AM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 9:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/22/2016 7:35 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 21:49:28 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:10:18 -0500, Alex wrote: He is a man of his word when it comes to a gentleman's wager . I was out of town for a few days and returned to find his postal money order for our election bet. I wasn't convinced that it would happen so I sent John the money I "owed" him in advance. It will go to a great cause that might bring a tear to Harry's eye. I'll leave it to John if he wants to fill in the blanks. I know it is fun to play with him but I always thought he was a good guy. I am a little disappointed we could not get together when I was in his "hood". I'd love to add a 'great minds think alike' comment, but here's proof they don't. I used to have respect for Harry's liberal views even though I didn't necessarily agree with many of them. I often enjoyed friendly debate but he's gone off the deep end it seems. He makes false claims about people that he doesn't really know, repeating them over and over until he is convinced in his obsessed mind that they are true. I can't deal with that kind of warped and dishonest mentality. It's straight out of the progressive liberal playbook. But it is perfectly ok when your buddy Justan makes "false claims about people he doesn't know," right? Of course, right, because as you have told me, you think those claims are "funny." Perhaps a bit of satire based mostly on truth. Don't like it? Don't read it. Prove me wrong on any of the truths I've told about you. Prove a moron like you wrong? What's the point? Then stop whining. You are such a baby. Your behavior doesn't bother me, **** for brains...it just gives me the opportunity to point out your buddy's hypocrisy. If you knew him, even casually, you wouldn't say that. Your problem is that you look in the mirror too often and see whay you acuse others of. I call 'em as I see 'em, ****-for-brains. Most of your posts here are nothing more than junior high school level insults. The term "**** for brains" was a popular one back in junior high. You do realize you're the most prolific tosser of JHSLI's, don't you? You should quit whining. The popularity of phrases in junior high pretty much depends on when and where you attended junior high. Back in the day when I was at Susan Sheridan Junior High, jerks like Justan were referred to as "flamers," which was "short" for flaming assholes. Typically, one of the junior high tough guys, and we had a few, would beat the **** out of the Justans once a week and send them home with a bloody nose and a torn shirt. Those of us who were smarter tutored some of the tough guys who wanted to get through junior high and high school and therefore we were considered untouchable. We didn't have "anonymous" loudmouths back then. Justan would have had to have behaved or been one of the class punching bags. Ha ha ha. So, you were a "brain" (popular phrase back then) and therefore of immense value to the mere mortals trying to get through. Meanwhile, you claim to be a regular Don Juan of the school, chasing every skirt that walked by. What a freakin' joke. I was one of many bright kids at Sheridan, and I helped out some of the boys who had trouble with their classes in English and American History. I also had a couple of girl friends in 7th, 8th, and 9th grade in junior high, as did almost every other guy. That's a tad different than being a "regular Don Juan," right? |
|
#33
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
One thing about Harry
On 11/22/16 6:30 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:43:56 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 2:36 PM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 2:15:02 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 2:04 PM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 1:51:57 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 1:22 PM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 11:10 AM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 9:48 AM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 9:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/22/2016 7:35 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 21:49:28 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:10:18 -0500, Alex wrote: He is a man of his word when it comes to a gentleman's wager . I was out of town for a few days and returned to find his postal money order for our election bet. I wasn't convinced that it would happen so I sent John the money I "owed" him in advance. It will go to a great cause that might bring a tear to Harry's eye. I'll leave it to John if he wants to fill in the blanks. I know it is fun to play with him but I always thought he was a good guy. I am a little disappointed we could not get together when I was in his "hood". I'd love to add a 'great minds think alike' comment, but here's proof they don't. I used to have respect for Harry's liberal views even though I didn't necessarily agree with many of them. I often enjoyed friendly debate but he's gone off the deep end it seems. He makes false claims about people that he doesn't really know, repeating them over and over until he is convinced in his obsessed mind that they are true. I can't deal with that kind of warped and dishonest mentality. It's straight out of the progressive liberal playbook. But it is perfectly ok when your buddy Justan makes "false claims about people he doesn't know," right? Of course, right, because as you have told me, you think those claims are "funny." Perhaps a bit of satire based mostly on truth. Don't like it? Don't read it. Prove me wrong on any of the truths I've told about you. Prove a moron like you wrong? What's the point? Then stop whining. You are such a baby. Your behavior doesn't bother me, **** for brains...it just gives me the opportunity to point out your buddy's hypocrisy. If you knew him, even casually, you wouldn't say that. Your problem is that you look in the mirror too often and see whay you acuse others of. I call 'em as I see 'em, ****-for-brains. Most of your posts here are nothing more than junior high school level insults. The term "**** for brains" was a popular one back in junior high. You do realize you're the most prolific tosser of JHSLI's, don't you? You should quit whining. The popularity of phrases in junior high pretty much depends on when and where you attended junior high. Back in the day when I was at Susan Sheridan Junior High, jerks like Justan were referred to as "flamers," which was "short" for flaming assholes. Typically, one of the junior high tough guys, and we had a few, would beat the **** out of the Justans once a week and send them home with a bloody nose and a torn shirt. Those of us who were smarter tutored some of the tough guys who wanted to get through junior high and high school and therefore we were considered untouchable. Ah, so you "paid" for protection. We called those guys "pusses", short for..., well, you know. So that allowed you to be a flamer with no repercussions. Explains a lot. Nah, I was pretty much a goody two shoes back then. I had a few buddies among the tough guys because I got them through English and American history. Justan wouldn't have had anything to offer them other than his nose and shirt pocket. In other words ... a "pussy". Maybe that was the case in "your crowd," but back in the day it wasn't unusual for students good in a particular subject in the schools I attended to help others. In fact, several days a week, a bunch of us would walk to the nearby branch of the public library to work on our homework, especially on those courses that required us to use reference books very few had in their households. Thanks to the help I got on occasion from a classmate there, I was able to "ace" out of the preliminary algebra class. She was a math whiz...I never was. What were you doing during your time in the Amity School System, playing hooky? |
|
#34
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
One thing about Harry
On 11/22/2016 6:39 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/22/16 6:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/22/2016 2:14 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 2:04 PM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 1:51:57 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 1:22 PM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 11:10 AM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 9:48 AM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 9:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/22/2016 7:35 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 21:49:28 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:10:18 -0500, Alex wrote: He is a man of his word when it comes to a gentleman's wager . I was out of town for a few days and returned to find his postal money order for our election bet. I wasn't convinced that it would happen so I sent John the money I "owed" him in advance. It will go to a great cause that might bring a tear to Harry's eye. I'll leave it to John if he wants to fill in the blanks. I know it is fun to play with him but I always thought he was a good guy. I am a little disappointed we could not get together when I was in his "hood". I'd love to add a 'great minds think alike' comment, but here's proof they don't. I used to have respect for Harry's liberal views even though I didn't necessarily agree with many of them. I often enjoyed friendly debate but he's gone off the deep end it seems. He makes false claims about people that he doesn't really know, repeating them over and over until he is convinced in his obsessed mind that they are true. I can't deal with that kind of warped and dishonest mentality. It's straight out of the progressive liberal playbook. But it is perfectly ok when your buddy Justan makes "false claims about people he doesn't know," right? Of course, right, because as you have told me, you think those claims are "funny." Perhaps a bit of satire based mostly on truth. Don't like it? Don't read it. Prove me wrong on any of the truths I've told about you. Prove a moron like you wrong? What's the point? Then stop whining. You are such a baby. Your behavior doesn't bother me, **** for brains...it just gives me the opportunity to point out your buddy's hypocrisy. If you knew him, even casually, you wouldn't say that. Your problem is that you look in the mirror too often and see whay you acuse others of. I call 'em as I see 'em, ****-for-brains. Most of your posts here are nothing more than junior high school level insults. The term "**** for brains" was a popular one back in junior high. You do realize you're the most prolific tosser of JHSLI's, don't you? You should quit whining. The popularity of phrases in junior high pretty much depends on when and where you attended junior high. Back in the day when I was at Susan Sheridan Junior High, jerks like Justan were referred to as "flamers," which was "short" for flaming assholes. Typically, one of the junior high tough guys, and we had a few, would beat the **** out of the Justans once a week and send them home with a bloody nose and a torn shirt. Those of us who were smarter tutored some of the tough guys who wanted to get through junior high and high school and therefore we were considered untouchable. We didn't have "anonymous" loudmouths back then. Justan would have had to have behaved or been one of the class punching bags. Ha ha ha. So, you were a "brain" (popular phrase back then) and therefore of immense value to the mere mortals trying to get through. Meanwhile, you claim to be a regular Don Juan of the school, chasing every skirt that walked by. What a freakin' joke. I was one of many bright kids at Sheridan, and I helped out some of the boys who had trouble with their classes in English and American History. I also had a couple of girl friends in 7th, 8th, and 9th grade in junior high, as did almost every other guy. That's a tad different than being a "regular Don Juan," right? Not according to your claims. |
|
#35
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
One thing about Harry
On 11/22/16 6:48 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/22/2016 6:39 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 6:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/22/2016 2:14 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 2:04 PM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 1:51:57 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 1:22 PM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 11:10 AM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 9:48 AM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 9:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/22/2016 7:35 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 21:49:28 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:10:18 -0500, Alex wrote: He is a man of his word when it comes to a gentleman's wager . I was out of town for a few days and returned to find his postal money order for our election bet. I wasn't convinced that it would happen so I sent John the money I "owed" him in advance. It will go to a great cause that might bring a tear to Harry's eye. I'll leave it to John if he wants to fill in the blanks. I know it is fun to play with him but I always thought he was a good guy. I am a little disappointed we could not get together when I was in his "hood". I'd love to add a 'great minds think alike' comment, but here's proof they don't. I used to have respect for Harry's liberal views even though I didn't necessarily agree with many of them. I often enjoyed friendly debate but he's gone off the deep end it seems. He makes false claims about people that he doesn't really know, repeating them over and over until he is convinced in his obsessed mind that they are true. I can't deal with that kind of warped and dishonest mentality. It's straight out of the progressive liberal playbook. But it is perfectly ok when your buddy Justan makes "false claims about people he doesn't know," right? Of course, right, because as you have told me, you think those claims are "funny." Perhaps a bit of satire based mostly on truth. Don't like it? Don't read it. Prove me wrong on any of the truths I've told about you. Prove a moron like you wrong? What's the point? Then stop whining. You are such a baby. Your behavior doesn't bother me, **** for brains...it just gives me the opportunity to point out your buddy's hypocrisy. If you knew him, even casually, you wouldn't say that. Your problem is that you look in the mirror too often and see whay you acuse others of. I call 'em as I see 'em, ****-for-brains. Most of your posts here are nothing more than junior high school level insults. The term "**** for brains" was a popular one back in junior high. You do realize you're the most prolific tosser of JHSLI's, don't you? You should quit whining. The popularity of phrases in junior high pretty much depends on when and where you attended junior high. Back in the day when I was at Susan Sheridan Junior High, jerks like Justan were referred to as "flamers," which was "short" for flaming assholes. Typically, one of the junior high tough guys, and we had a few, would beat the **** out of the Justans once a week and send them home with a bloody nose and a torn shirt. Those of us who were smarter tutored some of the tough guys who wanted to get through junior high and high school and therefore we were considered untouchable. We didn't have "anonymous" loudmouths back then. Justan would have had to have behaved or been one of the class punching bags. Ha ha ha. So, you were a "brain" (popular phrase back then) and therefore of immense value to the mere mortals trying to get through. Meanwhile, you claim to be a regular Don Juan of the school, chasing every skirt that walked by. What a freakin' joke. I was one of many bright kids at Sheridan, and I helped out some of the boys who had trouble with their classes in English and American History. I also had a couple of girl friends in 7th, 8th, and 9th grade in junior high, as did almost every other guy. That's a tad different than being a "regular Don Juan," right? Not according to your claims. You're either imaging or listening to your intellectually challenged buddy, "JustHopeless." I had a *couple* of girlfriends, two or three, in junior high. |
|
#36
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
One thing about Harry
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 11/22/16 6:30 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:43:56 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 2:36 PM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 2:15:02 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 2:04 PM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 1:51:57 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 1:22 PM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 11:10 AM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 9:48 AM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 9:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/22/2016 7:35 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 21:49:28 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:10:18 -0500, Alex wrote: He is a man of his word when it comes to a gentleman's wager . I was out of town for a few days and returned to find his postal money order for our election bet. I wasn't convinced that it would happen so I sent John the money I "owed" him in advance. It will go to a great cause that might bring a tear to Harry's eye. I'll leave it to John if he wants to fill in the blanks. I know it is fun to play with him but I always thought he was a good guy. I am a little disappointed we could not get together when I was in his "hood". I'd love to add a 'great minds think alike' comment, but here's proof they don't. I used to have respect for Harry's liberal views even though I didn't necessarily agree with many of them. I often enjoyed friendly debate but he's gone off the deep end it seems. He makes false claims about people that he doesn't really know, repeating them over and over until he is convinced in his obsessed mind that they are true. I can't deal with that kind of warped and dishonest mentality. It's straight out of the progressive liberal playbook. But it is perfectly ok when your buddy Justan makes "false claims about people he doesn't know," right? Of course, right, because as you have told me, you think those claims are "funny." Perhaps a bit of satire based mostly on truth. Don't like it? Don't read it. Prove me wrong on any of the truths I've told about you. Prove a moron like you wrong? What's the point? Then stop whining. You are such a baby. Your behavior doesn't bother me, **** for brains...it just gives me the opportunity to point out your buddy's hypocrisy. If you knew him, even casually, you wouldn't say that. Your problem is that you look in the mirror too often and see whay you acuse others of. I call 'em as I see 'em, ****-for-brains. Most of your posts here are nothing more than junior high school level insults. The term "**** for brains" was a popular one back in junior high. You do realize you're the most prolific tosser of JHSLI's, don't you? You should quit whining. The popularity of phrases in junior high pretty much depends on when and where you attended junior high. Back in the day when I was at Susan Sheridan Junior High, jerks like Justan were referred to as "flamers," which was "short" for flaming assholes. Typically, one of the junior high tough guys, and we had a few, would beat the **** out of the Justans once a week and send them home with a bloody nose and a torn shirt. Those of us who were smarter tutored some of the tough guys who wanted to get through junior high and high school and therefore we were considered untouchable. Ah, so you "paid" for protection. We called those guys "pusses", short for..., well, you know. So that allowed you to be a flamer with no repercussions. Explains a lot. Nah, I was pretty much a goody two shoes back then. I had a few buddies among the tough guys because I got them through English and American history. Justan wouldn't have had anything to offer them other than his nose and shirt pocket. In other words ... a "pussy". Maybe that was the case in "your crowd," but back in the day it wasn't unusual for students good in a particular subject in the schools I attended to help others. In fact, several days a week, a bunch of us would walk to the nearby branch of the public library to work on our homework, especially on those courses that required us to use reference books very few had in their households. Thanks to the help I got on occasion from a classmate there, I was able to "ace" out of the preliminary algebra class. She was a math whiz...I never was. What were you doing during your time in the Amity School System, playing hooky? How to make friends and influence people,,,,,,not. You're lashing out at everyone nowadays. How come? Does Hilerys loss hurt you so much that you can't control yourself? Where's your bride in your time of need? Is there anyone willing to step up and support you? -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
|
#37
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
One thing about Harry
Poquito Loco wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:10:18 -0500, Alex wrote: He is a man of his word when it comes to a gentleman's wager . I was out of town for a few days and returned to find his postal money order for our election bet. I wasn't convinced that it would happen so I sent John the money I "owed" him in advance. It will go to a great cause that might bring a tear to Harry's eye. I'll leave it to John if he wants to fill in the blanks. You didn't 'owe' me anything. It was a gracious gift to go towards a gift I plan to give an old Army veteran (a few years older than me, anyway). He served two tours in Vietnam, lost his job when his company folded, and is now living with his son and getting only Social Security. He loves shooting, especially my Kimber .45. We go at least every two weeks. He had left his guns, including a Colt M1911, with a son in Washington whose house was broken into. The guns were stolen along with all the other valuable stuff. He needs a gun. I'd been looking at some .45's with him in mind and have settled on the Ruger SR1911, which will run about $675. When I mentioned this to Alex, he immediately offered to help buy the gift, using the proceeds from his bet with Harry. Harry probably would have donated the money anyway...maybe...out of the goodness of his heart. Harry, thanks for coming through on your bet. Alex, thank you too! I've not ordered the gun yet. Waiting to see if the Trump election will cause prices to drop a bit. Lots of dealers really stocked up expecting Hillary to win. Harry's money will be well spent! |
|
#38
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
One thing about Harry
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/22/16 9:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/22/2016 7:35 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 21:49:28 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:10:18 -0500, Alex wrote: He is a man of his word when it comes to a gentleman's wager . I was out of town for a few days and returned to find his postal money order for our election bet. I wasn't convinced that it would happen so I sent John the money I "owed" him in advance. It will go to a great cause that might bring a tear to Harry's eye. I'll leave it to John if he wants to fill in the blanks. I know it is fun to play with him but I always thought he was a good guy. I am a little disappointed we could not get together when I was in his "hood". I'd love to add a 'great minds think alike' comment, but here's proof they don't. I used to have respect for Harry's liberal views even though I didn't necessarily agree with many of them. I often enjoyed friendly debate but he's gone off the deep end it seems. He makes false claims about people that he doesn't really know, repeating them over and over until he is convinced in his obsessed mind that they are true. I can't deal with that kind of warped and dishonest mentality. It's straight out of the progressive liberal playbook. But it is perfectly ok when your buddy Justan makes "false claims about people he doesn't know," right? Of course, right, because as you have told me, you think those claims are "funny." You're like a child - with narcissism. |
|
#39
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
One thing about Harry
True North wrote:
Make that 'dire straits' ?$#*!? Playbook! Try proofreading before you hit "send". |
|
#40
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
One thing about Harry
Califbill wrote:
True North wrote: Poquito Loco On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:10:18 -0500, Alex wrote: - show quoted text - "You didn't 'owe' me anything. It was a gracious gift to go towards a gift I plan to give an old Army veteran (a few years older than me, anyway). He served two tours in Vietnam, lost his job when his company folded, and is now living with his son and getting only Social Security. He loves shooting, especially my Kimber .45. We go at least every two weeks. He had left his guns, including a Colt M1911, with a son in Washington whose house was broken into. The guns were stolen along with all the other valuable stuff. He needs a gun. I'd been looking at some .45's with him in mind and have settled on the Ruger SR1911, which will run about $675. When I mentioned this to Alex, he immediately offered to help buy the gift, using the proceeds from his bet with Harry. Harry probably would have donated the money anyway...maybe...out of the goodness of his heart. Harry, thanks for coming through on your bet. Alex, thank you too! I've not ordered the gun yet. Waiting to see if the Trump election will cause prices to drop a bit. Lots of dealers really stocked up expecting Hillary to win." If that vet is in the direction straits you claim, I'd think a "gun" would be low on his list of priorities. How about suitable winter clothing, maybe some medical apparatus to make life easier etc. He is living with his son. So housing is taken care of. Medicare should take care of almost all his medical needs. He needs toys. Quality of life toys. True. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| 1 THING IS CERTAIN...... | General | |||
| 1 THING IS CERTAIN...... | General | |||
| Hey... is this thing ON? | General | |||
| Doing the Right Thing | ASA | |||
| Next big thing | ASA | |||
Linear Mode
