Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,344
Default Interesting perspective on electoral college value

There are 3,141 counties in the United States.
Trump won 3,084 of them.
Clinton won 57.

There are 62 counties in New York State.
Trump won 46 of them.
Clinton won 16.

Clinton won the popular vote by approx. 1.5 million votes.
In the 5 counties that encompass NYC, (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Richmond & Queens) Clinton
received well over 2 million more votes than Trump. (Clinton won 4 of these counties, Trump won
Richmond)

Therefore these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton winning the popular vote of the
entire country.

These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles.
The United States is comprised of 3, 797,000 square miles.

When you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of territory, it would be
ludicrous to even suggest that the vote of those that encompass a mere 319 square miles should
dictate the outcome of a national election.


***No, I did not check each and every number.***
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2016
Posts: 4,981
Default Interesting perspective on electoral college value

Poco Loco Wrote in message:
There are 3,141 counties in the United States.
Trump won 3,084 of them.
Clinton won 57.

There are 62 counties in New York State.
Trump won 46 of them.
Clinton won 16.

Clinton won the popular vote by approx. 1.5 million votes.
In the 5 counties that encompass NYC, (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Richmond & Queens) Clinton
received well over 2 million more votes than Trump. (Clinton won 4 of these counties, Trump won
Richmond)

Therefore these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton winning the popular vote of the
entire country.

These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles.
The United States is comprised of 3, 797,000 square miles.

When you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of territory, it would be
ludicrous to even suggest that the vote of those that encompass a mere 319 square miles should
dictate the outcome of a national election.


***No, I did not check each and every number.***


4 BOROUGHS AND 1 GENTLEMAN FARMER IN MARYLAND COULDN'T PULL THE
RABBIT OUT OF THE HAT FOR CLINTON. THEY SURE DID GIVE IT THE OLD
COLLEGE TRY THOUGH. MY THANKS TO THE MILLIONS OF DEPLORABLES WHO
COULDN'T BE BOUGHT.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interesting perspective on Unions and Social Security John H General 3 April 2nd 05 01:40 AM
Electoral Vote Guess Mr Wizzard General 11 November 2nd 04 06:04 PM
Bush by 43 electoral college votes . . . Capt,Neal? ASA 2 November 2nd 04 02:29 AM
Electoral state polling fun NOYB General 0 October 27th 04 09:38 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017