| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#21
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Russian hacking?
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 06:28:31 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: 8:23 AMKeyser Söze - show quoted text - Trump says a lot of things...and it is mostly bull****. -- Posted with my iPhone 7+. .... Maybe he learned the ropes over the last 8 years... === Harry's been around a lot longer than 20 years and SOS. |
|
#23
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Russian hacking?
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 19:28:03 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. I don't see a response from Harry here? BAO came across with more of his slammer impersonation, but wouldn't address the question. Maybe Donnie knows the answer. |
|
#24
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Russian hacking?
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 10:16:24 -0800 (PST), True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 December 2016 12:36:19 UTC-4, Justine giggles... Keyser Söze Wrote in message: justan wrote: "Mr. Luddite" Wrote in message: On 12/13/2016 7:54 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber. You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it. Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it. My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate question. It looks like "snowflake" is the latest right-wing term of derision. That's real impressive Trumpster. Carry on with your derisive gloating. It suits you well. I hope Trump does well for you. Sorta like the basket of deplorables, huh? I can only hope Trump does well for everybody ... including you. He'll be the POTUS on Jan 20. Trump says he wants to act as president for ALL the people. I don't know why BAO doesn't embrace that new concept. Trump says a lot of things...and it is mostly bull****. -- Posted with my iPhone 7+. Your entire act is bull****. I can't remember the last time you told the truth about anything that matters. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ The truth.... you couldn't handle the truth! It's nice to see you agree with his comment. Maybe your buddy should try telling the truth just once to see who couldn't handle it. |
|
#25
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Russian hacking?
wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 21:10:18 -0600, Califbill wrote: Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber. You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it. Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it. Pussy grabber? I thought you were referring to Bill Clinton. No he just pulls out his dick and tells ladies on his staff to kiss it. Occasionally one was young and dumb enough to do it. And he paid one I think $850k for telling her. |
|
#26
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Russian hacking?
Keyser Söze wrote:
justan wrote: "Mr. Luddite" Wrote in message: On 12/13/2016 7:54 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber. You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it. Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it. My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate question. It looks like "snowflake" is the latest right-wing term of derision. That's real impressive Trumpster. Carry on with your derisive gloating. It suits you well. I hope Trump does well for you. Sorta like the basket of deplorables, huh? I can only hope Trump does well for everybody ... including you. He'll be the POTUS on Jan 20. Trump says he wants to act as president for ALL the people. I don't know why BAO doesn't embrace that new concept. Trump says a lot of things...and it is mostly bull****. BS or not, he can not rape the country anymore Han. Last 4 presidential perps did. |
|
#27
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Russian hacking?
In article ,
says... On 12/13/2016 7:54 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber. You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it. Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it. My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate question. It looks like "snowflake" is the latest right-wing term of derision. That's real impressive Trumpster. Carry on with your derisive gloating. It suits you well. I hope Trump does well for you. Sorta like the basket of deplorables, huh? I can only hope Trump does well for everybody ... including you. He'll be the POTUS on Jan 20. I think you'll be sorely disappointed. I won't be. |
|
#28
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Russian hacking?
On 12/13/2016 6:27 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... On 12/13/2016 7:54 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber. You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it. Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it. My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate question. It looks like "snowflake" is the latest right-wing term of derision. That's real impressive Trumpster. Carry on with your derisive gloating. It suits you well. I hope Trump does well for you. Sorta like the basket of deplorables, huh? I can only hope Trump does well for everybody ... including you. He'll be the POTUS on Jan 20. I think you'll be sorely disappointed. I won't be. Well, as much as I am pleased that Hillary won't be running the US government for the next four years, I think the Donald has some very serious legal problems ahead. The Constitution specifically forbids him from personally benefiting in any way through payments or dealings with any foreign country. Trump has real estate holdings throughout the world. Unless he sells them all off before Jan 20, it means that if anybody from another country stays at one of his hotels or even buys a drink at the hotel bar, Trump is technically in violation of the Constitution. He's talking about transferring the management to his sons but that's apparently not enough legally. He postponed a news conference at which he was going to explain what he was going to do. I have a hunch that the postponement is because his legal beagles have advised him that his "solution" isn't going to cut it. Going to be interesting. |
|
#29
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Russian hacking?
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/13/2016 6:27 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/13/2016 7:54 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber. You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it. Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it. My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate question. It looks like "snowflake" is the latest right-wing term of derision. That's real impressive Trumpster. Carry on with your derisive gloating. It suits you well. I hope Trump does well for you. Sorta like the basket of deplorables, huh? I can only hope Trump does well for everybody ... including you. He'll be the POTUS on Jan 20. I think you'll be sorely disappointed. I won't be. Well, as much as I am pleased that Hillary won't be running the US government for the next four years, I think the Donald has some very serious legal problems ahead. The Constitution specifically forbids him from personally benefiting in any way through payments or dealings with any foreign country. Trump has real estate holdings throughout the world. Unless he sells them all off before Jan 20, it means that if anybody from another country stays at one of his hotels or even buys a drink at the hotel bar, Trump is technically in violation of the Constitution. He's talking about transferring the management to his sons but that's apparently not enough legally. He postponed a news conference at which he was going to explain what he was going to do. I have a hunch that the postponement is because his legal beagles have advised him that his "solution" isn't going to cut it. Going to be interesting. Blind trust, son in charge. Will be very similar to most other POTUS. So if you have stock in Exxon, you fail the test? |
|
#30
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Russian hacking?
On 12/13/2016 7:16 PM, Califbill wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/13/2016 6:27 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/13/2016 7:54 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber. You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it. Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it. My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate question. It looks like "snowflake" is the latest right-wing term of derision. That's real impressive Trumpster. Carry on with your derisive gloating. It suits you well. I hope Trump does well for you. Sorta like the basket of deplorables, huh? I can only hope Trump does well for everybody ... including you. He'll be the POTUS on Jan 20. I think you'll be sorely disappointed. I won't be. Well, as much as I am pleased that Hillary won't be running the US government for the next four years, I think the Donald has some very serious legal problems ahead. The Constitution specifically forbids him from personally benefiting in any way through payments or dealings with any foreign country. Trump has real estate holdings throughout the world. Unless he sells them all off before Jan 20, it means that if anybody from another country stays at one of his hotels or even buys a drink at the hotel bar, Trump is technically in violation of the Constitution. He's talking about transferring the management to his sons but that's apparently not enough legally. He postponed a news conference at which he was going to explain what he was going to do. I have a hunch that the postponement is because his legal beagles have advised him that his "solution" isn't going to cut it. Going to be interesting. Blind trust, son in charge. Will be very similar to most other POTUS. So if you have stock in Exxon, you fail the test? According to many legal beagles a blind trust isn't possible in Trump's case. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Russian crash | General | |||
| why are they talking about some russian? | General | |||
| Son of Democrat lawmaker indicted for hacking Palin's e-mail | ASA | |||
| Russian Bikini babes great Russian Navy... | General | |||
Linear Mode
