On 12/19/16 8:43 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 16:49:57 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/16 4:04 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:03:44 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/16 12:58 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 12:28:06 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

I find it hilarious you Trump enablers are ****ed off at everyone except
Trump himself, easily the scummiest incoming POTUS in the history of the
last 116 years.

1900? are you suggesting someone should shoot Trump now?
Mike Pence is no Teddy Roosevelt.
Be careful what you wish for. Trump is far more like you in things you
seem to care about than Pence (gays, abortion and the subjugation of
the Palestinians).

BTW I still have it at about 50:50 that Trump resigns when the full
impact of the divestiture of "Trump inc" he needs to do becomes
apparent to him.


Where do you get the idea that because I think Trump is scummiest
incoming POTUS in 116 years, I think he should be shot? What is the
matter with you?

You referenced McKinley and that was just about the only thing most
people know about him. He was shot 115 years and 3 months ago.
I suppose you might be talking about his desire for the government to
be on "real money" (the gold standard) but that still has little to do
with Trump. In 1900 you are talking about his second term.



No, I did not reference McKinley. I simply used 1900 as a starting
point. You really work extra hard trying to find hidden meanings. Makes
you look...foolish.

Really? "116 years" seemed pretty specific to me but I did know who
the president was then, simply because of the Spanish American war and
TR. That is middle school history. I also knew it was his second term.
That is why I was curious why you picked that date.
McKinley might have easily been repugnant to you tho. He was in favor
of fiscal responsibility, he got us into a war over a lie from the
media and he was a republican.


Perhaps you should ask instead of speculating. I didn't want to say
Trump would be the worst president since Harding, as I believe Trump
will be worse. That pretty much takes us to the 19th Century, and there
are a handful of choices for "worst president back then...Tyler,
Fillmore, Pierce, Johnson. I have no strong feelings about McKinley.

On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 21:19:20 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/16 8:43 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 16:49:57 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/16 4:04 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:03:44 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/16 12:58 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 12:28:06 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

I find it hilarious you Trump enablers are ****ed off at everyone except
Trump himself, easily the scummiest incoming POTUS in the history of the
last 116 years.

1900? are you suggesting someone should shoot Trump now?
Mike Pence is no Teddy Roosevelt.
Be careful what you wish for. Trump is far more like you in things you
seem to care about than Pence (gays, abortion and the subjugation of
the Palestinians).

BTW I still have it at about 50:50 that Trump resigns when the full
impact of the divestiture of "Trump inc" he needs to do becomes
apparent to him.


Where do you get the idea that because I think Trump is scummiest
incoming POTUS in 116 years, I think he should be shot? What is the
matter with you?

You referenced McKinley and that was just about the only thing most
people know about him. He was shot 115 years and 3 months ago.
I suppose you might be talking about his desire for the government to
be on "real money" (the gold standard) but that still has little to do
with Trump. In 1900 you are talking about his second term.



No, I did not reference McKinley. I simply used 1900 as a starting
point. You really work extra hard trying to find hidden meanings. Makes
you look...foolish.

Really? "116 years" seemed pretty specific to me but I did know who
the president was then, simply because of the Spanish American war and
TR. That is middle school history. I also knew it was his second term.
That is why I was curious why you picked that date.
McKinley might have easily been repugnant to you tho. He was in favor
of fiscal responsibility, he got us into a war over a lie from the
media and he was a republican.


Perhaps you should ask instead of speculating. I didn't want to say
Trump would be the worst president since Harding, as I believe Trump
will be worse. That pretty much takes us to the 19th Century, and there
are a handful of choices for "worst president back then...Tyler,
Fillmore, Pierce, Johnson. I have no strong feelings about McKinley.

OK sorry with confusing with me pedantry but I am a presidential
history buff and I thought 1900 was supposed to be significant.
I agree we have had some miserable presidents but the thing to
remember is we got through it. I still have to hope Trump is OK. We
are here now and looking back to what might have been is silly. I
would not have been any happier with Hillary.
I do think pushing him out might be worse that letting him do a term.
We are still feeling the effects of pushing out Nixon.

On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 02:13:47 -0800 (PST), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

Except for Krause, Moore has money and is looking for a Judas when actually by offering blood money he's only selling his own soul.

I never thought much of him before hand. I think less of him now.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/micha...ry?id=44276931


It turned out more electors said no to Hillary than Donald.
3 Democrats went with Colin Powell and 1 went with some indian nobody
ever heard of. One republican went for Kasich, one for Ron Paul. (so
there Harry, a Libertarian finally got an EC vote)