Filters
 

It always amazes me how different people can hear the same words,
delivered in the same tone and context and come to completely different
conclusions on what they just heard.

I purposely alternate between MSNBC and FoxNews whenever something of
importance is being discussed because I get a big kick out of their
respective filtered views.

So, President Trump (threw that in to **** off Harry) gives his short
inaugural speech. The crew on FoxNews is full of praises and how it
resonated with people who are sick and tired of politics as usual and
how it set an optimistic tone for the future.

Switch over to MSNBC and the commentary by Chris Matthews and Rachael
Maddow. Maddow was going on and on about Trump's theme of "America
first" and how that governing philosophy has led to nationalism,
fascism, and how it was the origins of the rise of the Nazi party and
power. She considered Trump's speech as "dark" and threatening.

Good freakin' grief.

Oh, then as the cameras started showing the parade route (in the rain)
she couldn't shut up about how sparsely it was populated. She's a piece
of work but if you need a quick snapshot of the progressive liberal
mentality all you need to do is listen to her for about 2 and a half
minutes. I don't do it often because it's so damn depressing.

Filters
 

Oh, then as the cameras started showing the parade route (in the rain)
she couldn't shut up about how sparsely it was populated. She's a piece
of work but if you need a quick snapshot of the progressive liberal
mentality all you need to do is listen to her for about 2 and a half
minutes. I don't do it often because it's so damn depressing.
......

I wasn't there and I didn't watch. But I was like millions of others in the same situation that couldn't attend or watch

.. I have a job and was at work!

Filters
 

On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 11:20:43 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:


Oh, then as the cameras started showing the parade route (in the rain)
she couldn't shut up about how sparsely it was populated. She's a piece
of work but if you need a quick snapshot of the progressive liberal
mentality all you need to do is listen to her for about 2 and a half
minutes. I don't do it often because it's so damn depressing.
.....

I wasn't there and I didn't watch. But I was like millions of others in the same situation that couldn't attend or watch

. I have a job and was at work!

The welfare assholes who don't work seem to have plenty of time to
break windows, throw bricks and set fires, calling it a protest (on TV
as we speak) but it is not exactly clear what cause they are
protesting for.
These just seem to be malcontents waiting for sundown so the looting
can start.

Filters
 

1:31
On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 11:20:43 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:
- show quoted text -
The welfare assholes who don't work seem to have plenty of time to
break windows, throw bricks and set fires, calling it a protest (on TV
as we speak) but it is not exactly clear what cause they are
protesting for.
These just seem to be malcontents waiting for sundown so the looting
can start.
.....

Greg I'd say your right. That's usually how it goes.

Filters
 

In article ,
says...

It always amazes me how different people can hear the same words,
delivered in the same tone and context and come to completely different
conclusions on what they just heard.

I purposely alternate between MSNBC and FoxNews whenever something of
importance is being discussed because I get a big kick out of their
respective filtered views.

So, President Trump (threw that in to **** off Harry) gives his short
inaugural speech. The crew on FoxNews is full of praises and how it
resonated with people who are sick and tired of politics as usual and
how it set an optimistic tone for the future.

Switch over to MSNBC and the commentary by Chris Matthews and Rachael
Maddow. Maddow was going on and on about Trump's theme of "America
first" and how that governing philosophy has led to nationalism,
fascism, and how it was the origins of the rise of the Nazi party and
power. She considered Trump's speech as "dark" and threatening.

Good freakin' grief.

Oh, then as the cameras started showing the parade route (in the rain)
she couldn't shut up about how sparsely it was populated. She's a piece
of work but if you need a quick snapshot of the progressive liberal
mentality all you need to do is listen to her for about 2 and a half
minutes. I don't do it often because it's so damn depressing.

Don't be a sourpuss. Switch channels.

Filters
 

On 1/20/2017 5:56 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

It always amazes me how different people can hear the same words,
delivered in the same tone and context and come to completely different
conclusions on what they just heard.

I purposely alternate between MSNBC and FoxNews whenever something of
importance is being discussed because I get a big kick out of their
respective filtered views.

So, President Trump (threw that in to **** off Harry) gives his short
inaugural speech. The crew on FoxNews is full of praises and how it
resonated with people who are sick and tired of politics as usual and
how it set an optimistic tone for the future.

Switch over to MSNBC and the commentary by Chris Matthews and Rachael
Maddow. Maddow was going on and on about Trump's theme of "America
first" and how that governing philosophy has led to nationalism,
fascism, and how it was the origins of the rise of the Nazi party and
power. She considered Trump's speech as "dark" and threatening.

Good freakin' grief.

Oh, then as the cameras started showing the parade route (in the rain)
she couldn't shut up about how sparsely it was populated. She's a piece
of work but if you need a quick snapshot of the progressive liberal
mentality all you need to do is listen to her for about 2 and a half
minutes. I don't do it often because it's so damn depressing.


Don't be a sourpuss. Switch channels.


Touché

Filters
 

On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:12:22 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

It always amazes me how different people can hear the same words,
delivered in the same tone and context and come to completely different
conclusions on what they just heard.

I purposely alternate between MSNBC and FoxNews whenever something of
importance is being discussed because I get a big kick out of their
respective filtered views.

So, President Trump (threw that in to **** off Harry) gives his short
inaugural speech. The crew on FoxNews is full of praises and how it
resonated with people who are sick and tired of politics as usual and
how it set an optimistic tone for the future.

Switch over to MSNBC and the commentary by Chris Matthews and Rachael
Maddow. Maddow was going on and on about Trump's theme of "America
first" and how that governing philosophy has led to nationalism,
fascism, and how it was the origins of the rise of the Nazi party and
power. She considered Trump's speech as "dark" and threatening.

Good freakin' grief.

Oh, then as the cameras started showing the parade route (in the rain)
she couldn't shut up about how sparsely it was populated. She's a piece
of work but if you need a quick snapshot of the progressive liberal
mentality all you need to do is listen to her for about 2 and a half
minutes. I don't do it often because it's so damn depressing.

You forgot Mathew's 'Hitlerian' characterization.

Filters
 

Mr. Luddite wrote:
It always amazes me how different people can hear the same words,
delivered in the same tone and context and come to completely
different conclusions on what they just heard.

I purposely alternate between MSNBC and FoxNews whenever something of
importance is being discussed because I get a big kick out of their
respective filtered views.

So, President Trump (threw that in to **** off Harry) gives his short
inaugural speech. The crew on FoxNews is full of praises and how it
resonated with people who are sick and tired of politics as usual and
how it set an optimistic tone for the future.

Switch over to MSNBC and the commentary by Chris Matthews and Rachael
Maddow. Maddow was going on and on about Trump's theme of "America
first" and how that governing philosophy has led to nationalism,
fascism, and how it was the origins of the rise of the Nazi party and
power. She considered Trump's speech as "dark" and threatening.

Good freakin' grief.

Oh, then as the cameras started showing the parade route (in the rain)
she couldn't shut up about how sparsely it was populated. She's a
piece of work but if you need a quick snapshot of the progressive
liberal mentality all you need to do is listen to her for about 2 and
a half minutes. I don't do it often because it's so damn depressing.

She has to stir the pot until her contract is up.

Filters
 

Filters
 

Tim wrote:

Oh, then as the cameras started showing the parade route (in the rain)
she couldn't shut up about how sparsely it was populated. She's a piece
of work but if you need a quick snapshot of the progressive liberal
mentality all you need to do is listen to her for about 2 and a half
minutes. I don't do it often because it's so damn depressing.
.....

I wasn't there and I didn't watch. But I was like millions of others in
the same situation that couldn't attend or watch

. I have a job and was at work!


Me. I was in Cabo San Lucas enjoying life. Did not really matter if I
watched or not. But seems as if the left just cannot accept they ran and
even committed fraud to run a extremely flawed candidate.