Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/23/17 2:59 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
Harry's also buying into the liberal belief that a carrier is "a moving target" in our modern Navy. It's moving all right but damn hard to hit with all the defensive systems and accompanying ships in a task force. Even if a couple got through, it's unlikely to be put out of commission. Uh-huh. Right. Because we have multiple tests demonstrating what happens to a carrier hit by a handful of missiles or torpedos loaded with a couple of tons of HE. Oh, we don't? |
#23
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 8:52:48 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
wrote: On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 17:10:41 -0700 (PDT), Its Me wrote: On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 7:22:23 PM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote: NORFOLK, Va. (AP) — With praise and a blessing for the military, President Donald Trump helped hand over the USS Gerald R. Ford to the Navy on Saturday and said the state-of-the-art aircraft carrier will send a "100,000-ton message to the world" about America's military might when it is ultimately deployed. U.S. allies will rest easy, Trump said, but America's enemies will "shake with fear" when they see the Ford cutting across the horizon. ...until it is slammed by a few missilea... -- Posted with my iPhone 7+. What is a "missilea"? Plural for missilus? Voice dictation with no autocorrect... ![]() -- Posted with my iPhone 7+. From Mr. Precision? |
#24
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 16:09:15 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 7/23/17 2:59 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: Harry's also buying into the liberal belief that a carrier is "a moving target" in our modern Navy. It's moving all right but damn hard to hit with all the defensive systems and accompanying ships in a task force. Even if a couple got through, it's unlikely to be put out of commission. Uh-huh. Right. Because we have multiple tests demonstrating what happens to a carrier hit by a handful of missiles or torpedos loaded with a couple of tons of HE. Oh, we don't? We have pretty good simulations because it is not the first time we have seen a ton of HE hitting a ship and they have these computers. The real issue is these carriers are going to set up 100-150 miles away with a destroyer screen and a sub or two. It is going to be hard to get close enough to take a shot at one. They also move around a bit themselves. I know the chinese have a truck fired cruise missile that can hit a ship but they still need to know where the ship is and hope an air to air missile doesn't shoot down their cruise missile 30 or 40 miles away from the carrier. We have some pretty good stuff on those destroyers. They can still have planes over your ass in 15 minutes, even when they are not loitering just outside your perimeter. They can keep that up 24/7 until they run out of bombs and jet fuel. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What a waste... | General | |||
What a waste. | General | |||
i am mercilessly hot, so I waste you | ASA | |||
do not waste a hat | ASA |