| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Why?
What are they trying to hide??
Publicly, White House officials and the President Donald Trump's personal lawyers have touted the administration's willingness to cooperate with the ongoing probes. But when it comes to the congressional investigations, the White House counsel's office is explicitly instructing witnesses to limit their testimony and test the extent of executive privilege by refusing to discuss any activity that occurred after the 2016 election. |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why?
On 1/17/18 8:12 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote:
What are they trying to hide?? Publicly, White House officials and the President Donald Trump's personal lawyers have touted the administration's willingness to cooperate with the ongoing probes. But when it comes to the congressional investigations, the White House counsel's office is explicitly instructing witnesses to limit their testimony and test the extent of executive privilege by refusing to discuss any activity that occurred after the 2016 election. Obstruction of justice and "bigly" money laundering with Russkis, Turks, and oligarchs from several former Soviet bloc states. And more. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why?
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/17/18 8:12 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote: What are they trying to hide?? Publicly, White House officials and the President Donald Trump's personal lawyers have touted the administration's willingness to cooperate with the ongoing probes. But when it comes to the congressional investigations, the White House counsel's office is explicitly instructing witnesses to limit their testimony and test the extent of executive privilege by refusing to discuss any activity that occurred after the 2016 election. Obstruction of justice and "bigly" money laundering with Russkis, Turks, and oligarchs from several former Soviet bloc states. And more. Sounds like they learned from Bill Clinton. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why?
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:09:10 -0000 (UTC), Bill
wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/17/18 8:12 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote: What are they trying to hide?? Publicly, White House officials and the President Donald Trump's personal lawyers have touted the administration's willingness to cooperate with the ongoing probes. But when it comes to the congressional investigations, the White House counsel's office is explicitly instructing witnesses to limit their testimony and test the extent of executive privilege by refusing to discuss any activity that occurred after the 2016 election. Obstruction of justice and "bigly" money laundering with Russkis, Turks, and oligarchs from several former Soviet bloc states. And more. Sounds like they learned from Bill Clinton. That is the problem with these investigations. When you look for election meddling, you find political apparatchiks but when you start following the money, you never know where you will end up. I think the Clintons are being quiet about this because they may end up in the cross hairs of a special prosecutor ... again. Realistically if Mueller thinks his mandate includes deals Manafort made a decade ago, why not look at other shady deals over the last decade. They are already looking at Uranium One and who knows what else may pop up? |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why?
|
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why?
|
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why?
|
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why?
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 16:07:56 -0500, wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 11:47:52 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/18/18 11:45 AM, wrote: On 18 Jan 2018 12:43:44 GMT, Keyser Soze wrote: wrote: On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:09:10 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/17/18 8:12 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote: What are they trying to hide?? Publicly, White House officials and the President Donald Trump's personal lawyers have touted the administration's willingness to cooperate with the ongoing probes. But when it comes to the congressional investigations, the White House counsel's office is explicitly instructing witnesses to limit their testimony and test the extent of executive privilege by refusing to discuss any activity that occurred after the 2016 election. Obstruction of justice and "bigly" money laundering with Russkis, Turks, and oligarchs from several former Soviet bloc states. And more. Sounds like they learned from Bill Clinton. That is the problem with these investigations. When you look for election meddling, you find political apparatchiks but when you start following the money, you never know where you will end up. I think the Clintons are being quiet about this because they may end up in the cross hairs of a special prosecutor ... again. Realistically if Mueller thinks his mandate includes deals Manafort made a decade ago, why not look at other shady deals over the last decade. They are already looking at Uranium One and who knows what else may pop up? More of your but what about nonsense... The things they are accusing Manafort of are way up in the "but what about" territory. It is clear Mueller is grabbing at any straw he can find to justify his job. If he can shovel some dirt on a democrat, it will blunt the allegations that he os on a partisan witch hunt. I do find it interesting that you imply your education gives you some special ability for creativity but your thoughts reflect the most "lock step", "by rote" thinking I have ever heard. I'm simply waiting for the results. Manafort is a sleaze, but so far he hasn't been convicted. So far nobody has and the ones who accepted pleas where not really implicating Trump in anything in what they admitted to. In fact Flynn copped to lying to Pence and that looks good for Pence. It gives him more plausible deniability in this whole mess. I really hope you are not too disappointed when nothing substantive comes out of all of this. Unlike you and your charitable heart, I hope he's greatly disappointed |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why?
Nomen Nescio wrote:
What are they trying to hide?? Publicly, White House officials and the President Donald Trump's personal lawyers have touted the administration's willingness to cooperate with the ongoing probes. But when it comes to the congressional investigations, the White House counsel's office is explicitly instructing witnesses to limit their testimony and test the extent of executive privilege by refusing to discuss any activity that occurred after the 2016 election. Yup. It's Harry Krause. |
Linear Mode
