Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2017
Posts: 4,961
Default Ships at sea


I found this pic on the 'net. Large ship in the foreground (D-30) is a
Navy "oiler" from which other ships refuel at sea.

The little ship behind it with it's bow sticking up in the air
is the USS Van Voorhis (DE-1028), taking on fuel. The Van Voorhis the
first ship I was assigned to in the Navy and spent a little over a year
on board.

Yup. Just another day at the office Harry.

https://tinyurl.com/y982x86m
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,650
Default Ships at sea

On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 16:17:18 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


I found this pic on the 'net. Large ship in the foreground (D-30) is a
Navy "oiler" from which other ships refuel at sea.

The little ship behind it with it's bow sticking up in the air
is the USS Van Voorhis (DE-1028), taking on fuel. The Van Voorhis the
first ship I was assigned to in the Navy and spent a little over a year
on board.

Yup. Just another day at the office Harry.

https://tinyurl.com/y982x86m


===

Looks like the Van Voorhis was only in commission for about 15 years.
Is that typical for a destroyer escort?

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2017
Posts: 4,961
Default Ships at sea

On 2/4/2018 4:50 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 16:17:18 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


I found this pic on the 'net. Large ship in the foreground (D-30) is a
Navy "oiler" from which other ships refuel at sea.

The little ship behind it with it's bow sticking up in the air
is the USS Van Voorhis (DE-1028), taking on fuel. The Van Voorhis the
first ship I was assigned to in the Navy and spent a little over a year
on board.

Yup. Just another day at the office Harry.

https://tinyurl.com/y982x86m


===

Looks like the Van Voorhis was only in commission for about 15 years.
Is that typical for a destroyer escort?


That was the normal lifetime for that class DE (Dealey class). They
were designed to be cheap to build and "expendable" if called upon in an
attack on a convoy or battle group.

DE's were primarily convoy escort destroyers designed for anti-submarine
operations. The two I was on were modified late in their lives to test
a new passive sonar system. The "DE" classification was changed to "FF"
(for "Frigate") in later classes.

The Dealey class DE's earned a reputation for being tough, sea going
ships for their size but weren't the most crew friendly. They were
slightly larger than early classes from WWII.





  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2017
Posts: 4,961
Default Ships at sea

On 2/4/2018 5:23 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/4/2018 4:50 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 16:17:18 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


I found this pic on the 'net.Â* Large ship in the foreground (D-30) is a
Navy "oiler" from which other ships refuel at sea.

The little ship behind it with it's bow sticking up in the air
is the USS Van Voorhis (DE-1028), taking on fuel.Â* The Van Voorhis the
first ship I was assigned to in the Navy and spent a little over a year
on board.

Yup.Â* Just another day at the office Harry.

https://tinyurl.com/y982x86m


===

Looks like the Van Voorhis was only in commission for about 15 years.
Is that typical for a destroyer escort?


That was the normal lifetime for that class DE (Dealey class).Â* They
were designed to be cheap to build and "expendable" if called upon in an
attack on a convoy or battle group.

DE's were primarily convoy escort destroyers designed for anti-submarine
operations.Â* The two I was on were modified late in their lives to test
a new passive sonar system.Â* The "DE" classification was changed to "FF"
(for "Frigate") in later classes.

The Dealey class DE's earned a reputation for being tough, sea going
ships for their size but weren't the most crew friendly.Â* They were
slightly larger than early classes from WWII.


BTW ... hidden from view in that picture is me ... on the fantail
talking to the fish. :-)



  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,650
Default Ships at sea

On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 17:24:44 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 2/4/2018 5:23 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/4/2018 4:50 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 16:17:18 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


I found this pic on the 'net.* Large ship in the foreground (D-30) is a
Navy "oiler" from which other ships refuel at sea.

The little ship behind it with it's bow sticking up in the air
is the USS Van Voorhis (DE-1028), taking on fuel.* The Van Voorhis the
first ship I was assigned to in the Navy and spent a little over a year
on board.

Yup.* Just another day at the office Harry.

https://tinyurl.com/y982x86m


===

Looks like the Van Voorhis was only in commission for about 15 years.
Is that typical for a destroyer escort?


That was the normal lifetime for that class DE (Dealey class).* They
were designed to be cheap to build and "expendable" if called upon in an
attack on a convoy or battle group.

DE's were primarily convoy escort destroyers designed for anti-submarine
operations.* The two I was on were modified late in their lives to test
a new passive sonar system.* The "DE" classification was changed to "FF"
(for "Frigate") in later classes.

The Dealey class DE's earned a reputation for being tough, sea going
ships for their size but weren't the most crew friendly.* They were
slightly larger than early classes from WWII.


BTW ... hidden from view in that picture is me ... on the fantail
talking to the fish. :-)


===

No shame in that, looks like a very rough day. I was thinking to
myself how difficult it must be to get any serious work done in
conditions like that.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2017
Posts: 4,961
Default Ships at sea

On 2/4/2018 5:57 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 17:24:44 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 2/4/2018 5:23 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/4/2018 4:50 PM,
wrote:
On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 16:17:18 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


I found this pic on the 'net.Â* Large ship in the foreground (D-30) is a
Navy "oiler" from which other ships refuel at sea.

The little ship behind it with it's bow sticking up in the air
is the USS Van Voorhis (DE-1028), taking on fuel.Â* The Van Voorhis the
first ship I was assigned to in the Navy and spent a little over a year
on board.

Yup.Â* Just another day at the office Harry.

https://tinyurl.com/y982x86m


===

Looks like the Van Voorhis was only in commission for about 15 years.
Is that typical for a destroyer escort?


That was the normal lifetime for that class DE (Dealey class).Â* They
were designed to be cheap to build and "expendable" if called upon in an
attack on a convoy or battle group.

DE's were primarily convoy escort destroyers designed for anti-submarine
operations.Â* The two I was on were modified late in their lives to test
a new passive sonar system.Â* The "DE" classification was changed to "FF"
(for "Frigate") in later classes.

The Dealey class DE's earned a reputation for being tough, sea going
ships for their size but weren't the most crew friendly.Â* They were
slightly larger than early classes from WWII.


BTW ... hidden from view in that picture is me ... on the fantail
talking to the fish. :-)


===

No shame in that, looks like a very rough day. I was thinking to
myself how difficult it must be to get any serious work done in
conditions like that.


You learn how to walk on walls.


  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 36,387
Default Ships at sea

On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 18:07:11 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

No shame in that, looks like a very rough day. I was thinking to
myself how difficult it must be to get any serious work done in
conditions like that.


You learn how to walk on walls.


And not spill your coffee ;-)

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are space ships ships? GuzzisRule General 6 September 11th 12 09:12 AM
Cruise Ships in Castries Harbour St. Lucia - Ships in Castries harbour Saint Lucia.JPG (1/1) Chris[_5_] Tall Ship Photos 4 December 2nd 09 02:01 PM
Tall Ships - Tall-Ships-1185463058828_0_7320479986610806.jpg Mike[_2_] Tall Ship Photos 2 September 16th 08 12:53 AM
"Short-Ships: 1939 1944 WWII Submarines Tall-Ships Index Sheet - 1.jpg 392366 bytes HEMI-Powered@[email protected] Tall Ship Photos 0 March 31st 08 06:53 PM
Usenet downloads: USS Ships Tall-Ships Index Sheet - 1.jpg 275158 bytes HEMI-Powered@[email protected] Tall Ship Photos 0 March 30th 08 08:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017