On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 17:13:34 -0000 (UTC), Bill
wrote:

Keyser Soze wrote:

The federal statute is five years.


Your a legal scholar now?

No he googled it up just like me.
18 USC 3282
Now if the IRS became interested they never forget tax fraud.

On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 13:50:37 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:


Trump's team can't seem to remember just how many times they've met with
the Russkis...

See that is the difference between the Trumps and the Clintons.
Hillary remembers every meeting with the Russians because they ****ed
her in all 3 holes every time.
Her SoS record was marked with disaster after disaster. Most we are
still dealing with.

On 4/12/18 9:51 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 12:13:01 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/11/18 11:01 AM, wrote:
On 11 Apr 2018 11:06:00 GMT, Keyser Soze wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those other crimes
should be ignored?

As I said a fishing expedition.

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election. Try to keep up, eh?

That is a pretty thin beef. All Cohen has to say is, IF there was any
political motivation at all, it was to help the GOP as a whole (house
seats, senate seats etc.) There is no limit to what you can contribute
to a party or a cause. Just look at the millions Steyer is spending
right now to help democrats.
If he wants to screw stormy in the legal sense, he just presses
blackmail charges. Most people are going to be less than forthcoming
in a blackmail case since they have to reveal the object of the
blackmail that they were paying to hide.


Oh...I forgot, you went to law school, too. There's just no end to
your expertise...

I don't have to be Clarence Darrow to understand the glaring loopholes
in the campaign finance laws, as long as you say it is just party
building. All you need to do is look at what Steyer is doing right
now.
He has admitted he will spend 10-20x what Stormy got, just to try to
swing the mid terms and get a Democrat house so they will impeach
Trump.


Let's see. Steyer is spending his own money and as far as I know isn't
accepting contributions, and he is up front about what he is doing. So,
what laws do you think Steyer is misusing?

On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 08:26:33 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/12/18 9:51 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 12:13:01 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/11/18 11:01 AM, wrote:
On 11 Apr 2018 11:06:00 GMT, Keyser Soze wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those other crimes
should be ignored?

As I said a fishing expedition.

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election. Try to keep up, eh?

That is a pretty thin beef. All Cohen has to say is, IF there was any
political motivation at all, it was to help the GOP as a whole (house
seats, senate seats etc.) There is no limit to what you can contribute
to a party or a cause. Just look at the millions Steyer is spending
right now to help democrats.
If he wants to screw stormy in the legal sense, he just presses
blackmail charges. Most people are going to be less than forthcoming
in a blackmail case since they have to reveal the object of the
blackmail that they were paying to hide.


Oh...I forgot, you went to law school, too. There's just no end to
your expertise...

I don't have to be Clarence Darrow to understand the glaring loopholes
in the campaign finance laws, as long as you say it is just party
building. All you need to do is look at what Steyer is doing right
now.
He has admitted he will spend 10-20x what Stormy got, just to try to
swing the mid terms and get a Democrat house so they will impeach
Trump.


Let's see. Steyer is spending his own money and as far as I know isn't
accepting contributions, and he is up front about what he is doing. So,
what laws do you think Steyer is misusing?

Cohen was using his own money too and I don't think either of them are
breaking the campaign finance laws. There is a huge loophole that
allows just about anything that does not show up as an ad, advocating
a single candidate. It will be very easy for Cohen to say he was
worried that bad Trump news would affect the turnout and the down
ballot races ... assuming they can make any election connection at
all. At the end of the day, we still have to remember it was Stormy
and her lawyer that picked the timing, along with the media that made
the offers to her.
The only question is whether Trump/Cohen would have paid before he
announced and his track record of paying hush money seems to say he
would have.