Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 6:13 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 2:19 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 1:30 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/22/2018 1:20 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 12:26 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/22/2018 11:58 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 11:23 AM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 4/22/18 9:40 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


He's respectful of his hosts, behaves himself but doesn't "cave" to
pressure of our adversaries.Â*Â* Nice to see for a change.

You are just so prejudiced that you only see, hear and believe
what you
want to see, hear and believe.

Tell me ... is your party going to put the nation first and confirm
Pompeo as SOS or are they going to continue their hypocritical, lock
step rejection of him?





I wouldn't vote to confirm a hawkish, anti-gay Kansan for
anything, but
what the Committee will do, well, I don't know. Pompeo is just
going to
feed Trump's foreign policy insanities.


Doi Pompeo go to the same Kansas liberal arts school you went to?


I'm not questioning Pompeo's intellect or education,
****-for-brains. He is a grad of West Point and Harvard Law and
worked for a big-time DC law firm. It's his hawkish, anti-gay
attitudes and the fact that he will simply bend over for Trump at
any opportunity.


In other words you don't support *anyone* who may be in the best
interests of the country if they are nominated by Trump.

Your argument is full of holes.Â* The Dems are holding up
or dragging their feet in the Senate on a large number of Trump
appointees including Richard Grenell to be U.S. ambassador to
Germany, nominated over six months ago.Â* Is it because Grenell is the
first openly gay spokesman for a Republican presidential candidate?

It's political bull**** at the expense of the nation, that's all.

If Trump appoints them, it is not, with a couple of exceptions, in the
best interests of the country.


So that answers that, as I suspected.Â* Good example is Pompeo.Â* He has
already opened the door a crack for a possible historic event with North
Korea and he hasn't even received his new business cards.Â* Dems had no
problem with him as CIA Director last year.Â* But, the mid-terms are
looming closer, eh?






Secretary of State is a job requiring skills and temperament a lot
different than those of CIA Director.


And a lot different than a Hillary. She got us screwed every which way
and got us in another war. Pompeo can not be that bad. Better education
than Hillary.


Your ignorance is on display...again.


You are beyond ignorant if you think Hillary had a decent SOS stewardship!
I do not think much of Kerry, but he was many levels above Hillary in his
stewardship.


Secretaries of State are directors and products of their times, but I
doubt you'd understand that. I was also commenting about your stupid
remark on education.


What is stupid about the remark? You seem to judge all on education.

On 4/23/18 11:18 AM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 6:13 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 2:19 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 1:30 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/22/2018 1:20 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 12:26 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/22/2018 11:58 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 11:23 AM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 4/22/18 9:40 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


He's respectful of his hosts, behaves himself but doesn't "cave" to
pressure of our adversaries.Â*Â* Nice to see for a change.

You are just so prejudiced that you only see, hear and believe
what you
want to see, hear and believe.

Tell me ... is your party going to put the nation first and confirm
Pompeo as SOS or are they going to continue their hypocritical, lock
step rejection of him?





I wouldn't vote to confirm a hawkish, anti-gay Kansan for
anything, but
what the Committee will do, well, I don't know. Pompeo is just
going to
feed Trump's foreign policy insanities.


Doi Pompeo go to the same Kansas liberal arts school you went to?


I'm not questioning Pompeo's intellect or education,
****-for-brains. He is a grad of West Point and Harvard Law and
worked for a big-time DC law firm. It's his hawkish, anti-gay
attitudes and the fact that he will simply bend over for Trump at
any opportunity.


In other words you don't support *anyone* who may be in the best
interests of the country if they are nominated by Trump.

Your argument is full of holes.Â* The Dems are holding up
or dragging their feet in the Senate on a large number of Trump
appointees including Richard Grenell to be U.S. ambassador to
Germany, nominated over six months ago.Â* Is it because Grenell is the
first openly gay spokesman for a Republican presidential candidate?

It's political bull**** at the expense of the nation, that's all.

If Trump appoints them, it is not, with a couple of exceptions, in the
best interests of the country.


So that answers that, as I suspected.Â* Good example is Pompeo.Â* He has
already opened the door a crack for a possible historic event with North
Korea and he hasn't even received his new business cards.Â* Dems had no
problem with him as CIA Director last year.Â* But, the mid-terms are
looming closer, eh?






Secretary of State is a job requiring skills and temperament a lot
different than those of CIA Director.


And a lot different than a Hillary. She got us screwed every which way
and got us in another war. Pompeo can not be that bad. Better education
than Hillary.


Your ignorance is on display...again.


You are beyond ignorant if you think Hillary had a decent SOS stewardship!
I do not think much of Kerry, but he was many levels above Hillary in his
stewardship.


Secretaries of State are directors and products of their times, but I
doubt you'd understand that. I was also commenting about your stupid
remark on education.


What is stupid about the remark? You seem to judge all on education.


You claimed Pompeo had a "better education" than Hillary. There's
nothing to support that claim of yours.

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/23/18 11:18 AM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 6:13 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 2:19 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 1:30 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/22/2018 1:20 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 12:26 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/22/2018 11:58 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 11:23 AM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 4/22/18 9:40 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


He's respectful of his hosts, behaves himself but doesn't "cave" to
pressure of our adversaries.Â*Â* Nice to see for a change.

You are just so prejudiced that you only see, hear and believe
what you
want to see, hear and believe.

Tell me ... is your party going to put the nation first and confirm
Pompeo as SOS or are they going to continue their hypocritical, lock
step rejection of him?





I wouldn't vote to confirm a hawkish, anti-gay Kansan for
anything, but
what the Committee will do, well, I don't know. Pompeo is just
going to
feed Trump's foreign policy insanities.


Doi Pompeo go to the same Kansas liberal arts school you went to?


I'm not questioning Pompeo's intellect or education,
****-for-brains. He is a grad of West Point and Harvard Law and
worked for a big-time DC law firm. It's his hawkish, anti-gay
attitudes and the fact that he will simply bend over for Trump at
any opportunity.


In other words you don't support *anyone* who may be in the best
interests of the country if they are nominated by Trump.

Your argument is full of holes.Â* The Dems are holding up
or dragging their feet in the Senate on a large number of Trump
appointees including Richard Grenell to be U.S. ambassador to
Germany, nominated over six months ago.Â* Is it because Grenell is the
first openly gay spokesman for a Republican presidential candidate?

It's political bull**** at the expense of the nation, that's all.

If Trump appoints them, it is not, with a couple of exceptions, in the
best interests of the country.


So that answers that, as I suspected.Â* Good example is Pompeo.Â* He has
already opened the door a crack for a possible historic event with North
Korea and he hasn't even received his new business cards.Â* Dems had no
problem with him as CIA Director last year.Â* But, the mid-terms are
looming closer, eh?






Secretary of State is a job requiring skills and temperament a lot
different than those of CIA Director.


And a lot different than a Hillary. She got us screwed every which way
and got us in another war. Pompeo can not be that bad. Better education
than Hillary.


Your ignorance is on display...again.


You are beyond ignorant if you think Hillary had a decent SOS stewardship!
I do not think much of Kerry, but he was many levels above Hillary in his
stewardship.


Secretaries of State are directors and products of their times, but I
doubt you'd understand that. I was also commenting about your stupid
remark on education.


What is stupid about the remark? You seem to judge all on education.


You claimed Pompeo had a "better education" than Hillary. There's
nothing to support that claim of yours.


I understand he is a Harvard lawyer. Not a minor law school.

On 4/23/18 11:48 AM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/23/18 11:18 AM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 6:13 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 2:19 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 1:30 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/22/2018 1:20 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 12:26 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/22/2018 11:58 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 11:23 AM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 4/22/18 9:40 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


He's respectful of his hosts, behaves himself but doesn't "cave" to
pressure of our adversaries.Â*Â* Nice to see for a change.

You are just so prejudiced that you only see, hear and believe
what you
want to see, hear and believe.

Tell me ... is your party going to put the nation first and confirm
Pompeo as SOS or are they going to continue their hypocritical, lock
step rejection of him?





I wouldn't vote to confirm a hawkish, anti-gay Kansan for
anything, but
what the Committee will do, well, I don't know. Pompeo is just
going to
feed Trump's foreign policy insanities.


Doi Pompeo go to the same Kansas liberal arts school you went to?


I'm not questioning Pompeo's intellect or education,
****-for-brains. He is a grad of West Point and Harvard Law and
worked for a big-time DC law firm. It's his hawkish, anti-gay
attitudes and the fact that he will simply bend over for Trump at
any opportunity.


In other words you don't support *anyone* who may be in the best
interests of the country if they are nominated by Trump.

Your argument is full of holes.Â* The Dems are holding up
or dragging their feet in the Senate on a large number of Trump
appointees including Richard Grenell to be U.S. ambassador to
Germany, nominated over six months ago.Â* Is it because Grenell is the
first openly gay spokesman for a Republican presidential candidate?

It's political bull**** at the expense of the nation, that's all.

If Trump appoints them, it is not, with a couple of exceptions, in the
best interests of the country.


So that answers that, as I suspected.Â* Good example is Pompeo.Â* He has
already opened the door a crack for a possible historic event with North
Korea and he hasn't even received his new business cards.Â* Dems had no
problem with him as CIA Director last year.Â* But, the mid-terms are
looming closer, eh?






Secretary of State is a job requiring skills and temperament a lot
different than those of CIA Director.


And a lot different than a Hillary. She got us screwed every which way
and got us in another war. Pompeo can not be that bad. Better education
than Hillary.


Your ignorance is on display...again.


You are beyond ignorant if you think Hillary had a decent SOS stewardship!
I do not think much of Kerry, but he was many levels above Hillary in his
stewardship.


Secretaries of State are directors and products of their times, but I
doubt you'd understand that. I was also commenting about your stupid
remark on education.


What is stupid about the remark? You seem to judge all on education.


You claimed Pompeo had a "better education" than Hillary. There's
nothing to support that claim of yours.


I understand he is a Harvard lawyer. Not a minor law school.


Mrs. Clinton had an illustrious academic career at Yale Law School. Not
a minor law school.

On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:34:57 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

You claimed Pompeo had a "better education" than Hillary. There's
nothing to support that claim of yours.

Assuming you think Yale law school is as good as Harvard, and plenty
of people will argue about that, you still have to think Wellesley, a
ladies liberal arts school, is better than West Point, a military
engineering school and that is highly debatable, particularly if you
are talking about geopolitics an a very militarized world.
We are not worried about France launching an art attack on the MOMO.
We are worried about the nuclear aspirations of several countries who
don't like us very much.

On 4/23/2018 11:59 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/23/18 11:48 AM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/23/18 11:18 AM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 6:13 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 2:19 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 1:30 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/22/2018 1:20 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 12:26 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/22/2018 11:58 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 11:23 AM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 4/22/18 9:40 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


He's respectful of his hosts, behaves himself but
doesn't "cave" to
pressure of our adversaries.Â*Â* Nice to see for a change.

You are just so prejudiced that you only see, hear and
believe
what you
want to see, hear and believe.

Tell me ... is your party going to put the nation first
and confirm
Pompeo as SOS or are they going to continue their
hypocritical, lock
step rejection of him?





I wouldn't vote to confirm a hawkish, anti-gay Kansan for
anything, but
what the Committee will do, well, I don't know. Pompeo is
just
going to
feed Trump's foreign policy insanities.


Doi Pompeo go to the same Kansas liberal arts school you
went to?


I'm not questioning Pompeo's intellect or education,
****-for-brains. He is a grad of West Point and Harvard Law
and
worked for a big-time DC law firm. It's his hawkish, anti-gay
attitudes and the fact that he will simply bend over for
Trump at
any opportunity.


In other words you don't support *anyone* who may be in the
best
interests of the country if they are nominated by Trump.

Your argument is full of holes.Â* The Dems are holding up
or dragging their feet in the Senate on a large number of Trump
appointees including Richard Grenell to be U.S. ambassador to
Germany, nominated over six months ago.Â* Is it because
Grenell is the
first openly gay spokesman for a Republican presidential
candidate?

It's political bull**** at the expense of the nation, that's
all.

If Trump appoints them, it is not, with a couple of
exceptions, in the
best interests of the country.


So that answers that, as I suspected.Â* Good example is
Pompeo.Â* He has
already opened the door a crack for a possible historic event
with North
Korea and he hasn't even received his new business cards.
Dems had no
problem with him as CIA Director last year.Â* But, the
mid-terms are
looming closer, eh?






Secretary of State is a job requiring skills and temperament a lot
different than those of CIA Director.


And a lot different than a Hillary.Â*Â* She got us screwed every
which way
and got us in another war.Â* Pompeo can not be that bad.Â* Better
education
than Hillary.


Your ignorance is on display...again.


You are beyond ignorant if you think Hillary had a decent SOS
stewardship!
I do not think much of Kerry, but he was many levels above Hillary
in his
stewardship.


Secretaries of State are directors and products of their times, but I
doubt you'd understand that. I was also commenting about your stupid
remark on education.


What is stupid about the remark?Â* You seem to judge all on education.


You claimed Pompeo had a "better education" than Hillary. There's
nothing to support that claim of yours.


I understand he is a Harvard lawyer.Â*Â* Not a minor law school.


Mrs. Clinton had an illustrious academic career at Yale Law School. Not
a minor law school.

She received her real "education" elsewhere.

On 4/23/18 12:11 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:34:57 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

You claimed Pompeo had a "better education" than Hillary. There's
nothing to support that claim of yours.

Assuming you think Yale law school is as good as Harvard, and plenty
of people will argue about that, you still have to think Wellesley, a
ladies liberal arts school, is better than West Point, a military
engineering school and that is highly debatable, particularly if you
are talking about geopolitics an a very militarized world.
We are not worried about France launching an art attack on the MOMO.
We are worried about the nuclear aspirations of several countries who
don't like us very much.


If you want to be an Army officer, West Point is the pinnacle.

On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 12:19:12 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/23/2018 11:59 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/23/18 11:48 AM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/23/18 11:18 AM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 6:13 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 2:19 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 1:30 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/22/2018 1:20 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 12:26 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/22/2018 11:58 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 11:23 AM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 4/22/18 9:40 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


He's respectful of his hosts, behaves himself but
doesn't "cave" to
pressure of our adversaries.Â*Â* Nice to see for a change.

You are just so prejudiced that you only see, hear and
believe
what you
want to see, hear and believe.

Tell me ... is your party going to put the nation first
and confirm
Pompeo as SOS or are they going to continue their
hypocritical, lock
step rejection of him?





I wouldn't vote to confirm a hawkish, anti-gay Kansan for
anything, but
what the Committee will do, well, I don't know. Pompeo is
just
going to
feed Trump's foreign policy insanities.


Doi Pompeo go to the same Kansas liberal arts school you
went to?


I'm not questioning Pompeo's intellect or education,
****-for-brains. He is a grad of West Point and Harvard Law
and
worked for a big-time DC law firm. It's his hawkish, anti-gay
attitudes and the fact that he will simply bend over for
Trump at
any opportunity.


In other words you don't support *anyone* who may be in the
best
interests of the country if they are nominated by Trump.

Your argument is full of holes.Â* The Dems are holding up
or dragging their feet in the Senate on a large number of Trump
appointees including Richard Grenell to be U.S. ambassador to
Germany, nominated over six months ago.Â* Is it because
Grenell is the
first openly gay spokesman for a Republican presidential
candidate?

It's political bull**** at the expense of the nation, that's
all.

If Trump appoints them, it is not, with a couple of
exceptions, in the
best interests of the country.


So that answers that, as I suspected.Â* Good example is
Pompeo.Â* He has
already opened the door a crack for a possible historic event
with North
Korea and he hasn't even received his new business cards.
Dems had no
problem with him as CIA Director last year.Â* But, the
mid-terms are
looming closer, eh?






Secretary of State is a job requiring skills and temperament a lot
different than those of CIA Director.


And a lot different than a Hillary.Â*Â* She got us screwed every
which way
and got us in another war.Â* Pompeo can not be that bad.Â* Better
education
than Hillary.


Your ignorance is on display...again.


You are beyond ignorant if you think Hillary had a decent SOS
stewardship!
I do not think much of Kerry, but he was many levels above Hillary
in his
stewardship.


Secretaries of State are directors and products of their times, but I
doubt you'd understand that. I was also commenting about your stupid
remark on education.


What is stupid about the remark?Â* You seem to judge all on education.


You claimed Pompeo had a "better education" than Hillary. There's
nothing to support that claim of yours.


I understand he is a Harvard lawyer.Â*Â* Not a minor law school.


Mrs. Clinton had an illustrious academic career at Yale Law School. Not
a minor law school.

She received her real "education" elsewhere.

Most of Hillary's education came from being a minor player in the
wings of the Watergate witch hunt. She learned that you MUST destroy
all of the evidence if you want to get away with anything. (without
the tapes, Nixon probably finishes his term)
They will put the words "there is no evidence to support that" on her
tombstone.

On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 12:38:38 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/23/18 12:11 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:34:57 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

You claimed Pompeo had a "better education" than Hillary. There's
nothing to support that claim of yours.

Assuming you think Yale law school is as good as Harvard, and plenty
of people will argue about that, you still have to think Wellesley, a
ladies liberal arts school, is better than West Point, a military
engineering school and that is highly debatable, particularly if you
are talking about geopolitics an a very militarized world.
We are not worried about France launching an art attack on the MOMO.
We are worried about the nuclear aspirations of several countries who
don't like us very much.


If you want to be an Army officer, West Point is the pinnacle.

It is also a top rated engineering program.

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/23/18 11:48 AM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/23/18 11:18 AM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 6:13 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 2:19 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 1:30 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/22/2018 1:20 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 12:26 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/22/2018 11:58 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/22/18 11:23 AM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 4/22/18 9:40 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


He's respectful of his hosts, behaves himself but doesn't "cave" to
pressure of our adversaries.Â*Â* Nice to see for a change.

You are just so prejudiced that you only see, hear and believe
what you
want to see, hear and believe.

Tell me ... is your party going to put the nation first and confirm
Pompeo as SOS or are they going to continue their hypocritical, lock
step rejection of him?





I wouldn't vote to confirm a hawkish, anti-gay Kansan for
anything, but
what the Committee will do, well, I don't know. Pompeo is just
going to
feed Trump's foreign policy insanities.


Doi Pompeo go to the same Kansas liberal arts school you went to?


I'm not questioning Pompeo's intellect or education,
****-for-brains. He is a grad of West Point and Harvard Law and
worked for a big-time DC law firm. It's his hawkish, anti-gay
attitudes and the fact that he will simply bend over for Trump at
any opportunity.


In other words you don't support *anyone* who may be in the best
interests of the country if they are nominated by Trump.

Your argument is full of holes.Â* The Dems are holding up
or dragging their feet in the Senate on a large number of Trump
appointees including Richard Grenell to be U.S. ambassador to
Germany, nominated over six months ago.Â* Is it because Grenell is the
first openly gay spokesman for a Republican presidential candidate?

It's political bull**** at the expense of the nation, that's all.

If Trump appoints them, it is not, with a couple of exceptions, in the
best interests of the country.


So that answers that, as I suspected.Â* Good example is Pompeo.Â* He has
already opened the door a crack for a possible historic event with North
Korea and he hasn't even received his new business cards.Â* Dems had no
problem with him as CIA Director last year.Â* But, the mid-terms are
looming closer, eh?






Secretary of State is a job requiring skills and temperament a lot
different than those of CIA Director.


And a lot different than a Hillary. She got us screwed every which way
and got us in another war. Pompeo can not be that bad. Better education
than Hillary.


Your ignorance is on display...again.


You are beyond ignorant if you think Hillary had a decent SOS stewardship!
I do not think much of Kerry, but he was many levels above Hillary in his
stewardship.


Secretaries of State are directors and products of their times, but I
doubt you'd understand that. I was also commenting about your stupid
remark on education.


What is stupid about the remark? You seem to judge all on education.


You claimed Pompeo had a "better education" than Hillary. There's
nothing to support that claim of yours.


I understand he is a Harvard lawyer. Not a minor law school.


Mrs. Clinton had an illustrious academic career at Yale Law School. Not
a minor law school.


Maybe at school, but not outside school. She was an attorney on the
Watergate commission. Which the head of said they should have fired her.
Did not, but gave her a really negative appraisal. She never made partner
in the Rose Law firm. In other words, not a competent lawyer.