Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, March 18, 2000 at 3:00:00 AM UTC-5, Richard C. Belanger wrote:
Hi: I have been looking at a new Carver 396. Looks like a nice boat, good for the family, though not a hard-core offshore design. Everything has been looking good until I went to http://www.yachtsurvey.com David Pascoe has a post on Carver's that makes me feel I would be better off lashing together some logs than getting a Carver. Needless to say I am more than a little concerned. He points out major problems in the fabrication of Carver boats - and essentially says they are unworthy of any consideration. We have been comparing Carver's to Maxum and SeaRay and have liked the Carver's better - partly because they seem to be more solidly put together. Some friends who have newer Carver's and cruise them heavily have also had good things to say about the seaworthiness of the boat. I hadn't considered the more hard-core boats like Bertram and Hatteras since I believed they were completely out of my price range. Any opinions out there? Would I be making a huge mistake with a Carver? Should I just keep saving for a better quality boat? My primary goal is cruising the boat in Massachusetts waters - based out of Boston. Thanks, Rich The titanic hit a ice burg and sank, how big of a rock should anyone hit. Try not to hit anything but if you do be prepared. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Carver boats - a big mistake? | General | |||
Carver boats - a big mistake? | General | |||
mistake | General | |||
Another mistake? | ASA |