Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
How many here ....
On 9/27/2018 8:44 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 9/27/18 7:42 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 9/27/2018 7:31 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Mr. Luddite wrote: Which, of course, is the whole purpose of the current bull**** campaign going on orchestrated by your party. You think the revelations about Kavsnaugh are B.S.? How very Republican of you. Kavanaugh is a deeply flawed man, that much is clear.Â* His part in the Starr investigation is ironic now that the shoe is on the other foot.Â* He is simply reaping what he's sown. Of course to Luddite, it's all "unfair."Â* Snowflakes all. It's a given that they blame the Dems for all their sins. It's all Pelosi's fault!Â* It's Schumer's fault! Crybabies. "Snowflakes" and "Crybabies" are terms that referred to the progressive liberals, mostly in California, and was coined by those on the conservative side of the fence. In true dishonest behavior the left has now stolen those terms to describe their adversaries on the right.Â* Figures. Show me proof that Kavanaugh is "deeply flawed".Â* You can't. You've just joined the liberal bandwagon, repeating the same unified claims. I just mentioned to Harry ... if it were not Kavanaugh and Trump's choice of a nominee was another person of conservative leanings, I suspect we'd be witnessing a similar smear campaign. What *really* would be interesting is if Kavanaugh is rejected and Trump replaces him with a very conservative *woman* as his nominee. What will be the Dem's strategy then? As I have previously posted, there is no shortage of right-wing trash who appeal to Trump waiting in the wings. You didn't answer my question. What if he replaced Kavanaugh with an equally conservative woman as his nominee? How would your party smear her? |
#33
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
How many here ....
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 08:53:30 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 9/27/2018 8:44 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/27/18 7:42 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 9/27/2018 7:31 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Mr. Luddite wrote: Which, of course, is the whole purpose of the current bull**** campaign going on orchestrated by your party. You think the revelations about Kavsnaugh are B.S.? How very Republican of you. Kavanaugh is a deeply flawed man, that much is clear.* His part in the Starr investigation is ironic now that the shoe is on the other foot.* He is simply reaping what he's sown. Of course to Luddite, it's all "unfair."* Snowflakes all. It's a given that they blame the Dems for all their sins. It's all Pelosi's fault!* It's Schumer's fault! Crybabies. "Snowflakes" and "Crybabies" are terms that referred to the progressive liberals, mostly in California, and was coined by those on the conservative side of the fence. In true dishonest behavior the left has now stolen those terms to describe their adversaries on the right.* Figures. Show me proof that Kavanaugh is "deeply flawed".* You can't. You've just joined the liberal bandwagon, repeating the same unified claims. I just mentioned to Harry ... if it were not Kavanaugh and Trump's choice of a nominee was another person of conservative leanings, I suspect we'd be witnessing a similar smear campaign. What *really* would be interesting is if Kavanaugh is rejected and Trump replaces him with a very conservative *woman* as his nominee. What will be the Dem's strategy then? As I have previously posted, there is no shortage of right-wing trash who appeal to Trump waiting in the wings. You didn't answer my question. What if he replaced Kavanaugh with an equally conservative woman as his nominee? How would your party smear her? Get a bunch of guys to claim rape! Easy! They just claim she used a gun in one hand and Viagra in the other. |
#34
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
How many here ....
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 08:53:30 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 9/27/2018 8:44 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/27/18 7:42 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 9/27/2018 7:31 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Mr. Luddite wrote: Which, of course, is the whole purpose of the current bull**** campaign going on orchestrated by your party. You think the revelations about Kavsnaugh are B.S.? How very Republican of you. Kavanaugh is a deeply flawed man, that much is clear.Â* His part in the Starr investigation is ironic now that the shoe is on the other foot.Â* He is simply reaping what he's sown. Of course to Luddite, it's all "unfair."Â* Snowflakes all. It's a given that they blame the Dems for all their sins. It's all Pelosi's fault!Â* It's Schumer's fault! Crybabies. "Snowflakes" and "Crybabies" are terms that referred to the progressive liberals, mostly in California, and was coined by those on the conservative side of the fence. In true dishonest behavior the left has now stolen those terms to describe their adversaries on the right.Â* Figures. Show me proof that Kavanaugh is "deeply flawed".Â* You can't. You've just joined the liberal bandwagon, repeating the same unified claims. I just mentioned to Harry ... if it were not Kavanaugh and Trump's choice of a nominee was another person of conservative leanings, I suspect we'd be witnessing a similar smear campaign. What *really* would be interesting is if Kavanaugh is rejected and Trump replaces him with a very conservative *woman* as his nominee. What will be the Dem's strategy then? As I have previously posted, there is no shortage of right-wing trash who appeal to Trump waiting in the wings. You didn't answer my question. What if he replaced Kavanaugh with an equally conservative woman as his nominee? How would your party smear her? I think we are about to find out, after this inquisition is over. I do agree Kavanaugh is probably toast, not because they have proved anything but simply because he was "Borked". It may be a misstep by the left tho because he might have been the least objectionable candidate to them. I doubt they can do this twice in a row. |
#35
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
How many here ....
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|