| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#61
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Deadbeats have no right
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:52:23 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/4/18 11:03 AM, wrote: * I don't have any problems with atheism. It certainly is more logical than religious beliefs. Your atheism is as offensive to most people as religion is to you and your cohorts certainly make plenty of public displays on public property about it during your protests. It has become a religion as much as any other. I also reject the idea that you attending some tertiary institution for a few years five decades ago makes you any smarter than me., You have not seemed to learn much since. I've never said I was smarter than you. You're regressing into your projections *again*. You go out of your way to try to insult me just about every day. To what protests of mine are you referring? The people with signs and other props on public property protesting just about anything remotely considered religious. |
|
#63
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Deadbeats have no right
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 10/4/18 12:16 PM, wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:52:23 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/4/18 11:03 AM, wrote: * I don't have any problems with atheism. It certainly is more logical than religious beliefs. Your atheism is as offensive to most people as religion is to you and your cohorts certainly make plenty of public displays on public property about it during your protests. It has become a religion as much as any other. I also reject the idea that you attending some tertiary institution for a few years five decades ago makes you any smarter than me., You have not seemed to learn much since. I've never said I was smarter than you. You're regressing into your projections *again*. You go out of your way to try to insult me just about every day. To what protests of mine are you referring? The people with signs and other props on public property protesting just about anything remotely considered religious. 1. Likewise, but I've never claimed to be "smarter" than you. Stop projecting. 2. Those aren't protests of mine. The last "protest" I attended was one "favoring" the candidacy of Sarah Palin, and that was only to look at the misspelled signs. Not so. Remember the pink hat you wore and probably still wear. What was that occasion? -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
|
#64
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Deadbeats have no right
Wrote in message:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:28:17 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:07:58 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/4/18 9:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/4/2018 8:08 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/4/18 5:52 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/3/2018 10:29 PM, wrote: On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 21:26:13 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: The reports I've seen indicate otherwise, in the IRS all over the Trumps' ass. He gets audited every year if that is what you mean but I have not heard much about judgements against him. You aren't serious about saying the IRS is suddenly interested in things that happened in the 1950s, 60s and 70s (that this article describes) are you? Never said or implied that, Mr. Debater. Well then mr professional writer what is "the IRS all over the Trumps' ass." supposed to imply? The IRS isn't all over Trump's ass about his tax returns. The Dems are. It's their next hit attack. Based on reports on MSNBC if the Dems gain control of the House in November they plan to demand the release of Trump's tax returns, all based on the article published in the NYTimes. 1. The comment about Trump and the IRS was ironic...I suppose the irony was lost on you, as usual. 2. The Dems have been calling for the release of Trump's tax returns for a few years, and that call is not the result of the latest NYT article. If the Dems do force the release of Trump's tax returns, what's the downside? Just about every POTUS candidate and POTUS has released returns for decades, but not Trump. It isn't because he is being audited, it is because he doesn't want voters to have the skinny on his finances, including the percentage of income Trump has actually paid in taxes. You've been able to make that conclusion without seeing his returns, huh? Wow. Just about every other POTUS and POTUS wannabe has released their tax info. Trump has something big to hide. Just about every other candidate was a politician not a business man and the money they made was off the books. You notice Kerry released his returns but not his wife's. The Bushes and Ted Kennedy released their personal returns but not the returns of their family trusts. BTW it is interesting that prior to recent times it was only republicans who released tax returns with the exception of Truman. We never saw FDR, LBJ or JFK but we did see Nixon and Ford. Do you see a pattern there? Truman and Carter were poor, FDR, JFK and LBJ were rich business men or in business families. Yawn. More ?but what about...? That is your standard answer to anyone pointing out the double standard democrats have Just as boring as his "my daddy" stories. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
|
#65
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Deadbeats have no right
On 10/4/18 12:43 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 10/4/18 12:16 PM, wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:52:23 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/4/18 11:03 AM, wrote: * I don't have any problems with atheism. It certainly is more logical than religious beliefs. Your atheism is as offensive to most people as religion is to you and your cohorts certainly make plenty of public displays on public property about it during your protests. It has become a religion as much as any other. I also reject the idea that you attending some tertiary institution for a few years five decades ago makes you any smarter than me., You have not seemed to learn much since. I've never said I was smarter than you. You're regressing into your projections *again*. You go out of your way to try to insult me just about every day. To what protests of mine are you referring? The people with signs and other props on public property protesting just about anything remotely considered religious. 1. Likewise, but I've never claimed to be "smarter" than you. Stop projecting. 2. Those aren't protests of mine. The last "protest" I attended was one "favoring" the candidacy of Sarah Palin, and that was only to look at the misspelled signs. Not so. Remember the pink hat you wore and probably still wear. What was that occasion? I wasn't protesting. I was supporting women. |
|
#66
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Deadbeats have no right
On Thursday, October 4, 2018 at 12:48:43 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/4/18 12:43 PM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 10/4/18 12:16 PM, wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:52:23 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/4/18 11:03 AM, wrote: * I don't have any problems with atheism. It certainly is more logical than religious beliefs. Your atheism is as offensive to most people as religion is to you and your cohorts certainly make plenty of public displays on public property about it during your protests. It has become a religion as much as any other. I also reject the idea that you attending some tertiary institution for a few years five decades ago makes you any smarter than me., You have not seemed to learn much since. I've never said I was smarter than you. You're regressing into your projections *again*. You go out of your way to try to insult me just about every day. To what protests of mine are you referring? The people with signs and other props on public property protesting just about anything remotely considered religious. 1. Likewise, but I've never claimed to be "smarter" than you. Stop projecting. 2. Those aren't protests of mine. The last "protest" I attended was one "favoring" the candidacy of Sarah Palin, and that was only to look at the misspelled signs. Not so. Remember the pink hat you wore and probably still wear. What was that occasion? I wasn't protesting. I was supporting women. That's a change. You usually expect women to support you. |
|
#67
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Deadbeats have no right
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:15:57 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/4/18 12:11 PM, wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:28:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:07:58 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/4/18 9:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/4/2018 8:08 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/4/18 5:52 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/3/2018 10:29 PM, wrote: On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 21:26:13 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: The reports I've seen indicate otherwise, in the IRS all over the Trumps' ass. He gets audited every year if that is what you mean but I have not heard much about judgements against him. You aren't serious about saying the IRS is suddenly interested in things that happened in the 1950s, 60s and 70s* (that this article describes) are you? Never said or implied that, Mr. Debater. Well then mr professional writer what is "the IRS all over the Trumps' ass." supposed to imply? The IRS isn't all over Trump's ass about his tax returns.* The Dems are. It's their next hit attack.* Based on reports on MSNBC if the Dems gain control of the House in November they plan to demand the release of Trump's tax returns, all based on the article published in the NYTimes. 1. The comment about Trump and the IRS was ironic...I suppose the irony was lost on you, as usual. 2. The Dems have been calling for the release of Trump's tax returns for a few years, and that call is not the result of the latest NYT article. If the Dems do force the release of Trump's tax returns, what's the downside? Just about every POTUS candidate and POTUS has released returns for decades, but not Trump. It isn't because he is being audited, it is because he doesn't want voters to have the skinny on his finances, including the percentage of income Trump has actually paid in taxes. You've been able to make that conclusion without seeing his returns, huh?** Wow. Just about every other POTUS and POTUS wannabe has released their tax info. Trump has something big to hide. Just about every other candidate was a politician not a business man and the money they made was off the books. You notice Kerry released his returns but not his wife's. The Bushes and Ted Kennedy released their personal returns but not the returns of their family trusts. BTW it is interesting that prior to recent times it was only republicans who released tax returns with the exception of Truman. We never saw FDR, LBJ or JFK but we did see Nixon and Ford. Do you see a pattern there? Truman and Carter were poor, FDR, JFK and LBJ were rich business men or in business families. Yawn. More “but what about...” That is your standard answer to anyone pointing out the double standard democrats have "But what about..." Exactly, the double standard. Democrat sexual harassers, rapists, domestic abusers and murderers are still heroes to you. |
|
#68
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Deadbeats have no right
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:32:00 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/4/18 12:16 PM, wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:52:23 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/4/18 11:03 AM, wrote: * I don't have any problems with atheism. It certainly is more logical than religious beliefs. Your atheism is as offensive to most people as religion is to you and your cohorts certainly make plenty of public displays on public property about it during your protests. It has become a religion as much as any other. I also reject the idea that you attending some tertiary institution for a few years five decades ago makes you any smarter than me., You have not seemed to learn much since. I've never said I was smarter than you. You're regressing into your projections *again*. You go out of your way to try to insult me just about every day. To what protests of mine are you referring? The people with signs and other props on public property protesting just about anything remotely considered religious. 1. Likewise, but I've never claimed to be "smarter" than you. Stop projecting. 2. Those aren't protests of mine. The last "protest" I attended was one "favoring" the candidacy of Sarah Palin, and that was only to look at the misspelled signs. You still advocate for them. BTW what about your pussy hat demonstration. Were you lying then or are you lying now? |
|
#69
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Deadbeats have no right
|
|
#70
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Deadbeats have no right
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 20:37:15 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/3/18 7:59 PM, wrote: On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 16:40:51 -0400, John H. wrote: On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 11:08:55 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 07:12:21 -0400, John H. wrote: On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 20:11:38 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/2/18 6:34 PM, justan wrote: To determine what happens or doesn't happen on public property. President Trump participated in dubious tax schemes during the 1990s, including instances of outright fraud, that greatly increased the fortune he received from his parents, an investigation by The New York Times has found. Mr. Trump won the presidency proclaiming himself a self-made billionaire, and he has long insisted that his father, the legendary New York City builder Fred C. Trump, provided almost no financial help. But The Timess investigation, based on a vast trove of confidential tax returns and financial records, reveals that Mr. Trump received the equivalent today of at least $413 million from his fathers real estate empire, starting when he was a toddler and continuing to this day. Much of this money came to Mr. Trump because he helped his parents dodge taxes. He and his siblings set up a sham corporation to disguise millions of dollars in gifts from their parents, records and interviews show. Records indicate that Mr. Trump helped his father take improper tax deductions worth millions more. He also helped formulate a strategy to undervalue his parents real estate holdings by hundreds of millions of dollars on tax returns, sharply reducing the tax bill when those properties were transferred to him and his siblings. These maneuvers met with little resistance from the Internal Revenue Service, The Times found. The presidents parents, Fred and Mary Trump, transferred well over $1 billion in wealth to their children, which could have produced a tax bill of at least $550 million under the 55 percent tax rate then imposed on gifts and inheritances. The Trumps paid a total of $52.2 million, or about 5 percent, tax records show. Shame on them for following the law. Gosh, I circumvent paying taxes by contributing to charity. Shame on me for taking the deduction! Harry would say you are establishing religion. I'll admit some goes to religion, but most goes elsewhere. The reality is religious organizations as a rule return more of their contributions to the charity they support than the normal 501(C)(3) that we hear about (Red Cross, United Way etc) Their "directors" are not making 6 figure salaries. Folks like Harry would rather promote egregious greed than admit someone was promoting God And there you go, offering up another example of one the reasons why I don't think it worthwhile to engage in "debate" with you. You have no idea what I would "rather promote." Harry, you don't think your continuous promotion of the **** you promote would provide an indication of what you would 'rather promote'? |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Responsible credit-card users to subsidize deadbeats | General | |||
Linear Mode
