On 10/3/2018 11:17 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 07:48:25 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 10/3/2018 6:52 AM, John H. wrote:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/chr...y-sounds-alarm


Eye-opening, eh Krause?

Note that the guy didn't request 'confidentiality' either.



If this guy's comments are truthful they really put a different slant on
Ford's testimony before the senate committee.

In addition to his claim that Ford, (holding a PhD in Psychiatry)
provided counseling services to others on what a polygraph is and how to
take them, he also debunked her claims of her "fear" of flying and the
trauma induced requirement for two front doors as she described.

In her testimony she was specifically asked if she ever talked to anyone
about taking a polygraph. She answered, "Never".

Hmmmmm....

There is also a story floating around that she used to live in a 500
sq/ft apartment with one door and her time line for the "2 door"
addition was wrong.
As an old teacher told us once "the difference between history and
fiction is fact".
It appears that when she was being coached on her testimony they
seemed to forget that.
Remind us again of that latin phrase Blumenthal used.
“Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus,�



That story came from the letter her former boyfriend wrote. I'll
paste it here again in case you haven't seen it:

=================

I, [redacted], am a current resident of [redacted], California.

I first met Christine Blasey (now Dr. Christine Blasey Ford) in
1989 or 1990 in California. From 1990-91, I was just friends with Ford.
From approximately 1992 to 1998, I was in a relationship with Dr. Ford.
I found her truthful and maintain no animus towards her.

During our time dating, Dr. Ford never brought up anything
regarding her experience as a victim of sexual assault, harassment, or
misconduct. Dr. Ford never mentioned Brett Kavanaugh.

During some of the time we were dating, Dr. Ford lived with Monica
L. McLean, who I understood to be her life-long best friend. During that
time, it was my understanding that McLean was interviewing for jobs with
the FBI and the US Attorney's Office. I witnessed Dr. Ford help McLean
prepare for a potential polygraph exam. Dr. Ford explained in detail
what to expect, how polygraphs worked and helped McLean become familiar
and less nervous about the exam. Dr. Ford was able to help because of
her background in psychology.

Dr. Ford and I lived together for while we were dating and stayed
together in a long-distance relationship when Dr. Ford moved to Hawaii
sometime around 1998, although I am not sure of the particular year and
it might have been a bit earlier or later.

White visiting Ford in Hawaii, we traveled around the Hawaiian
island including one time on a propeller plane. Dr. Ford never indicated
a fear of flying. TO the best of my recollection Dr. Ford never
expressed a fear of closed quarters, tight spaces, or places with only
one exist. I assisted Dr. Ford with finding a place to live in
[redacted], CA. She ended up living in a very small, 500 sq. ft. house
with one door.

Despite trying to maintain a long distance relationship, I ended
the relationship once I discovered that Dr. Ford was unfaithful while
living in Hawaii. After the break up, I took her off the credit card we
shared. But nearly 1 year later, I noticed Dr. Ford had been charging
the card, and charged about $600 worth of merchandise. When confronted,
Dr. Ford said she did not use the card, but later admitted to the use
after I threatened to involve fraud prevention.

I didn't speak again to Ford until about 2002 when Ford contacted
me briefly. After that I hadn't thought much about her until I saw her
story in the Washington Post on Sunday, Sept. 16, 2018.

I don not want to become involved in this process or current
investigation, but wanted to be truthful about what I know.

Signed,

[redacted]

On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 11:47:29 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

But nearly 1 year later, I noticed Dr. Ford had been charging
the card, and charged about $600 worth of merchandise. When confronted,
Dr. Ford said she did not use the card, but later admitted to the use
after I threatened to involve fraud prevention.

Yeah the crazy ex girlfriend from hell.

On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 09:22:19 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/3/18 7:48 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/3/2018 6:52 AM, John H. wrote:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/chr...y-sounds-alarm



Eye-opening, eh Krause?

Note that the guy didn't request 'confidentiality' either.



If this guy's comments are truthful they really put a different slant on
Ford's testimony before the senate committee.

In addition to his claim that Ford, (holding a PhD in Psychiatry)
provided counseling services to others on what a polygraph is and how to
take them, he also debunked her claims of her "fear" of flying and the
trauma induced requirement for two front doors as she described.

In her testimony she was specifically asked if she ever talked to anyone
about taking a polygraph.* She answered, "Never".

Hmmmmm....

It's wonderful that you are such a stalwart supporter of Donald PigVomit.

The comments were directed at Ford's testimony, or didn't you notice that.

You sound as though you're talking from deep in a corner again.

On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 11:45:42 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 10/3/2018 9:22 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/3/18 7:48 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/3/2018 6:52 AM, John H. wrote:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/chr...y-sounds-alarm



Eye-opening, eh Krause?

Note that the guy didn't request 'confidentiality' either.



If this guy's comments are truthful they really put a different slant on
Ford's testimony before the senate committee.

In addition to his claim that Ford, (holding a PhD in Psychiatry)
provided counseling services to others on what a polygraph is and how
to take them, he also debunked her claims of her "fear" of flying and
the trauma induced requirement for two front doors as she described.

In her testimony she was specifically asked if she ever talked to anyone
about taking a polygraph.* She answered, "Never".

Hmmmmm....

It's wonderful that you* are such a stalwart supporter of Donald PigVomit.


Who mentioned Donald Trump? I thought this was regarding the testimony
of Dr. Ford.

For your reading pleasure I have pasted the slightly redacted letter
sent by Ford's sometimes live-in boyfriend of 6 years (below). If
truthful, it raises some questions as to Ford's credibility:

===============

I, [redacted], am a current resident of [redacted], California.

I first met Christine Blasey (now Dr. Christine Blasey Ford) in
1989 or 1990 in California. From 1990-91, I was just friends with Ford.
From approximately 1992 to 1998, I was in a relationship with Dr. Ford.
I found her truthful and maintain no animus towards her.

During our time dating, Dr. Ford never brought up anything
regarding her experience as a victim of sexual assault, harassment, or
misconduct. Dr. Ford never mentioned Brett Kavanaugh.

During some of the time we were dating, Dr. Ford lived with Monica
L. McLean, who I understood to be her life-long best friend. During that
time, it was my understanding that McLean was interviewing for jobs with
the FBI and the US Attorney's Office. I witnessed Dr. Ford help McLean
prepare for a potential polygraph exam. Dr. Ford explained in detail
what to expect, how polygraphs worked and helped McLean become familiar
and less nervous about the exam. Dr. Ford was able to help because of
her background in psychology.

Dr. Ford and I lived together for while we were dating and stayed
together in a long-distance relationship when Dr. Ford moved to Hawaii
sometime around 1998, although I am not sure of the particular year and
it might have been a bit earlier or later.

White visiting Ford in Hawaii, we traveled around the Hawaiian
island including one time on a propeller plane. Dr. Ford never indicated
a fear of flying. TO the best of my recollection Dr. Ford never
expressed a fear of closed quarters, tight spaces, or places with only
one exist. I assisted Dr. Ford with finding a place to live in
[redacted], CA. She ended up living in a very small, 500 sq. ft. house
with one door.

Despite trying to maintain a long distance relationship, I ended
the relationship once I discovered that Dr. Ford was unfaithful while
living in Hawaii. After the break up, I took her off the credit card we
shared. But nearly 1 year later, I noticed Dr. Ford had been charging
the card, and charged about $600 worth of merchandise. When confronted,
Dr. Ford said she did not use the card, but later admitted to the use
after I threatened to involve fraud prevention.

I didn't speak again to Ford until about 2002 when Ford contacted
me briefly. After that I hadn't thought much about her until I saw her
story in the Washington Post on Sunday, Sept. 16, 2018.

I don not want to become involved in this process or current
investigation, but wanted to be truthful about what I know.

Signed,

[redacted]


~~~crickets~~~

(And name-calling doesn't count as a response, Harry.)

On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 11:17:29 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 07:48:25 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 10/3/2018 6:52 AM, John H. wrote:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/chr...y-sounds-alarm


Eye-opening, eh Krause?

Note that the guy didn't request 'confidentiality' either.



If this guy's comments are truthful they really put a different slant on
Ford's testimony before the senate committee.

In addition to his claim that Ford, (holding a PhD in Psychiatry)
provided counseling services to others on what a polygraph is and how to
take them, he also debunked her claims of her "fear" of flying and the
trauma induced requirement for two front doors as she described.

In her testimony she was specifically asked if she ever talked to anyone
about taking a polygraph. She answered, "Never".

Hmmmmm....

There is also a story floating around that she used to live in a 500
sq/ft apartment with one door and her time line for the "2 door"
addition was wrong.
As an old teacher told us once "the difference between history and
fiction is fact".
It appears that when she was being coached on her testimony they
seemed to forget that.
Remind us again of that latin phrase Blumenthal used.
“Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus,”

That's in the letter Luddite posted.

On 10/3/2018 4:31 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 11:17:29 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 07:48:25 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 10/3/2018 6:52 AM, John H. wrote:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/chr...y-sounds-alarm


Eye-opening, eh Krause?

Note that the guy didn't request 'confidentiality' either.



If this guy's comments are truthful they really put a different slant on
Ford's testimony before the senate committee.

In addition to his claim that Ford, (holding a PhD in Psychiatry)
provided counseling services to others on what a polygraph is and how to
take them, he also debunked her claims of her "fear" of flying and the
trauma induced requirement for two front doors as she described.

In her testimony she was specifically asked if she ever talked to anyone
about taking a polygraph. She answered, "Never".

Hmmmmm....

There is also a story floating around that she used to live in a 500
sq/ft apartment with one door and her time line for the "2 door"
addition was wrong.
As an old teacher told us once "the difference between history and
fiction is fact".
It appears that when she was being coached on her testimony they
seemed to forget that.
Remind us again of that latin phrase Blumenthal used.
“Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus,�

That's in the letter Luddite posted.



The two door thing is because the person Ford bought the house from
had a marriage consoling business that Ford allowed the former owner
to continue to use. The second door was the entrance to the business.

My, my how stories change.

On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 17:03:09 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 10/3/2018 4:31 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 11:17:29 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 07:48:25 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 10/3/2018 6:52 AM, John H. wrote:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/chr...y-sounds-alarm


Eye-opening, eh Krause?

Note that the guy didn't request 'confidentiality' either.



If this guy's comments are truthful they really put a different slant on
Ford's testimony before the senate committee.

In addition to his claim that Ford, (holding a PhD in Psychiatry)
provided counseling services to others on what a polygraph is and how to
take them, he also debunked her claims of her "fear" of flying and the
trauma induced requirement for two front doors as she described.

In her testimony she was specifically asked if she ever talked to anyone
about taking a polygraph. She answered, "Never".

Hmmmmm....

There is also a story floating around that she used to live in a 500
sq/ft apartment with one door and her time line for the "2 door"
addition was wrong.
As an old teacher told us once "the difference between history and
fiction is fact".
It appears that when she was being coached on her testimony they
seemed to forget that.
Remind us again of that latin phrase Blumenthal used.
“Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus,�

That's in the letter Luddite posted.



The two door thing is because the person Ford bought the house from
had a marriage consoling business that Ford allowed the former owner
to continue to use. The second door was the entrance to the business.

My, my how stories change.


I feel bad for Ford but I have already said that. She is going to be
road kill before this is over and it was all unnecessary. She really
wanted Feinstein to keep her out of this.
She ends being as flawed as Kananaugh and the rest, like Swetnick are
basket cases.
This is a sorry affair from start to finish.
The reality is, we might actually want a justice who has done a few
things he is not proud of and understands his mistakes. Most of the
ones we have really respected had a checkered past and grew from it..

On 10/3/2018 8:41 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 17:03:09 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 10/3/2018 4:31 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 11:17:29 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 07:48:25 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 10/3/2018 6:52 AM, John H. wrote:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/chr...y-sounds-alarm


Eye-opening, eh Krause?

Note that the guy didn't request 'confidentiality' either.



If this guy's comments are truthful they really put a different slant on
Ford's testimony before the senate committee.

In addition to his claim that Ford, (holding a PhD in Psychiatry)
provided counseling services to others on what a polygraph is and how to
take them, he also debunked her claims of her "fear" of flying and the
trauma induced requirement for two front doors as she described.

In her testimony she was specifically asked if she ever talked to anyone
about taking a polygraph. She answered, "Never".

Hmmmmm....

There is also a story floating around that she used to live in a 500
sq/ft apartment with one door and her time line for the "2 door"
addition was wrong.
As an old teacher told us once "the difference between history and
fiction is fact".
It appears that when she was being coached on her testimony they
seemed to forget that.
Remind us again of that latin phrase Blumenthal used.
“Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus,�

That's in the letter Luddite posted.



The two door thing is because the person Ford bought the house from
had a marriage consoling business that Ford allowed the former owner
to continue to use. The second door was the entrance to the business.

My, my how stories change.


I feel bad for Ford but I have already said that. She is going to be
road kill before this is over and it was all unnecessary. She really
wanted Feinstein to keep her out of this.
She ends being as flawed as Kananaugh and the rest, like Swetnick are
basket cases.
This is a sorry affair from start to finish.
The reality is, we might actually want a justice who has done a few
things he is not proud of and understands his mistakes. Most of the
ones we have really respected had a checkered past and grew from it..



Ford's high school yearbook has been found, inspected and discussed at
length in the past couple of days. You won't hear much about it
on MSNBC or CNN but it describes a party time atmosphere with lots
of drinking in which Ford appears to have been a major player.

The thing that really causes me to question the validity of her
testimony is her testimony about her polygraph test. She talks
about "a machine with wires that were attached to my body" in a
little girl's voice as if she knew nothing about it and was somewhat
scared of it. Yet, there is sworn testimony that she, as a
psychiatrist, helped at least one person prepare for a polygraph
test, explaining the equipment, how it worked and how to respond
to questions.

On 10/4/18 5:44 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/3/2018 8:41 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 17:03:09 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 10/3/2018 4:31 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 11:17:29 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 07:48:25 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 10/3/2018 6:52 AM, John H. wrote:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/chr...y-sounds-alarm



Eye-opening, eh Krause?

Note that the guy didn't request 'confidentiality' either.



If this guy's comments are truthful they really put a different
slant on
Ford's testimony before the senate committee.

In addition to his claim that Ford, (holding a PhD in Psychiatry)
provided counseling services to others on what a polygraph is and
how to
take them, he also debunked her claims of her "fear" of flying and
the
trauma induced requirement for two front doors as she described.

In her testimony she was specifically asked if she ever talked to
anyone
about taking a polygraph.Â* She answered, "Never".

Hmmmmm....

There is also a story floating around that she used to live in a 500
sq/ft apartment with one door and her time line for the "2 door"
addition was wrong.
As an old teacher told us once "the difference between history and
fiction is fact".
It appears that when she was being coached on her testimony they
seemed to forget that.
Remind us again of that latin phrase Blumenthal used.
“Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus,�

That's in the letter Luddite posted.



The two door thing is because the person Ford bought the house from
had a marriage consoling business that Ford allowed the former owner
to continue to use.Â* The second door was the entrance to the business.

My, my how stories change.


I feel bad for Ford but I have already said that. She is going to be
road kill before this is over and it was all unnecessary. She really
wanted Feinstein to keep her out of this.
She ends being as flawed as Kananaugh and the rest, like Swetnick are
basket cases.
This is a sorry affair from start to finish.
The reality is, we might actually want a justice who has done a few
things he is not proud of and understands his mistakes. Most of the
ones we have really respected had a checkered past and grew from it..



Ford's high school yearbook has been found, inspected and discussed at
length in the past couple of days.Â* You won't hear much about it
on MSNBC or CNN but it describes a party time atmosphere with lots
of drinking in which Ford appears to have been a major player.

The thing that really causes me to question the validity of her
testimony is her testimony about her polygraph test.Â* She talks
about "a machine with wires that were attached to my body" in a
little girl's voice as if she knew nothing about it and was somewhat
scared of it.Â* Yet, there is sworn testimony that she, as a
psychiatrist, helped at least one person prepare for a polygraph
test, explaining the equipment, how it worked and how to respond
to questions.



1. None of that means she was previously hooked up to a polygraph and
examined. I could describe how to perform an appendectomy, but that
doesn't mean I could perform one.

2. She is not a psychiatrist.

Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 10/4/18 5:44 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/3/2018 8:41 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 17:03:09 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 10/3/2018 4:31 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 11:17:29 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 07:48:25 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 10/3/2018 6:52 AM, John H. wrote:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/chr...y-sounds-alarm



Eye-opening, eh Krause?

Note that the guy didn't request 'confidentiality' either.



If this guy's comments are truthful they really put a different
slant on
Ford's testimony before the senate committee.

In addition to his claim that Ford, (holding a PhD in Psychiatry)
provided counseling services to others on what a polygraph is and
how to
take them, he also debunked her claims of her "fear" of flying and
the
trauma induced requirement for two front doors as she described.

In her testimony she was specifically asked if she ever talked to
anyone
about taking a polygraph. She answered, "Never".

Hmmmmm....

There is also a story floating around that she used to live in a 500
sq/ft apartment with one door and her time line for the "2 door"
addition was wrong.
As an old teacher told us once "the difference between history and
fiction is fact".
It appears that when she was being coached on her testimony they
seemed to forget that.
Remind us again of that latin phrase Blumenthal used.
?Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus,?

That's in the letter Luddite posted.



The two door thing is because the person Ford bought the house from
had a marriage consoling business that Ford allowed the former owner
to continue to use. The second door was the entrance to the business.

My, my how stories change.


I feel bad for Ford but I have already said that. She is going to be
road kill before this is over and it was all unnecessary. She really
wanted Feinstein to keep her out of this.
She ends being as flawed as Kananaugh and the rest, like Swetnick are
basket cases.
This is a sorry affair from start to finish.
The reality is, we might actually want a justice who has done a few
things he is not proud of and understands his mistakes. Most of the
ones we have really respected had a checkered past and grew from it..



Ford's high school yearbook has been found, inspected and discussed at
length in the past couple of days. You won't hear much about it
on MSNBC or CNN but it describes a party time atmosphere with lots
of drinking in which Ford appears to have been a major player.

The thing that really causes me to question the validity of her
testimony is her testimony about her polygraph test. She talks
about "a machine with wires that were attached to my body" in a
little girl's voice as if she knew nothing about it and was somewhat
scared of it. Yet, there is sworn testimony that she, as a
psychiatrist, helped at least one person prepare for a polygraph
test, explaining the equipment, how it worked and how to respond
to questions.



1. None of that means she was previously hooked up to a polygraph and
examined. I could describe how to perform an appendectomy, but that
doesn't mean I could perform one.

2. She is not a psychiatrist.


#1. It's good to know your limitations.
#2. She is a DINO just like yur missus.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/