Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,424
Default Abrogate the 14th?

POTUS Pig Vomit wants to kill the 14th Amendment, the one that says:

"Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and
subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States
and of the State wherein they reside."

You just know that Orange Asshole has never read the Constitution and if
he does ever read it, he won't understand it.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2018
Posts: 82
Default Abrogate the 14th?

Keyser Soze wrote:
POTUS Pig Vomit wants to kill the 14th Amendment, the one that says:

"Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States,
and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United
States and of the State wherein they reside."

You just know that Orange Asshole has never read the Constitution and
if he does ever read it, he won't understand it.


They are, but their parents aren't, Fat Harry.
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2017
Posts: 4,961
Default Abrogate the 14th?

On 10/30/2018 7:49 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
POTUS Pig Vomit wants to kill the 14th Amendment, theÂ* one that says:

"Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States,
and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United
States and of the State wherein they reside."

You just know that Orange Asshole has never read the Constitution and
if heÂ* does ever read it, heÂ* won't understand it.


They are, but their parents aren't, Fat Harry.



Harry doesn't understand it either. There's more to this birthright
issue than what he'd like to believe in his simple minded, narrow
point of view.
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,111
Default Abrogate the 14th?

Mr. Luddite
- show quoted text -
Harry doesn't understand it either. There's more to this birthright
issue than what he'd like to believe in his simple minded, narrow
point of view.
........


It’d probably be safe to say that his cats know more about politics than he does.
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,553
Default Abrogate the 14th?

Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/30/2018 7:49 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
POTUS Pig Vomit wants to kill the 14th Amendment, theÂ* one that says:

"Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States,
and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United
States and of the State wherein they reside."

You just know that Orange Asshole has never read the Constitution and
if heÂ* does ever read it, heÂ* won't understand it.


They are, but their parents aren't, Fat Harry.



Harry doesn't understand it either. There's more to this birthright
issue than what he'd like to believe in his simple minded, narrow
point of view.


Were they subject to the jurisdiction when they were born? The parents
were here illegally, so what about the subject part?



  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2016
Posts: 2,215
Default Abrogate the 14th?

On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 8:58:25 PM UTC-4, Tim wrote:
Mr. Luddite
- show quoted text -
Harry doesn't understand it either. There's more to this birthright
issue than what he'd like to believe in his simple minded, narrow
point of view.
.......


It’d probably be safe to say that his cats know more about politics than he does.


Funny how the left says the Constitution is a living, breathing document until someone on the right wants to change it.
  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 36,387
Default Abrogate the 14th?

On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 15:10:33 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

POTUS Pig Vomit wants to kill the 14th Amendment, the one that says:

"???Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and
subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States
and of the State wherein they reside."

You just know that Orange Asshole has never read the Constitution and if
he does ever read it, he won't understand it.


Trump is not the first one to question what "Under the jurisdiction of
the US" really means. I heard it discussed in the 90s when Clinton was
on the anti immigration bandwagon and it has popped up a number of
times since then. The question is whether an "illegal" who is here
under a false identity or living in the underground economy and
unknown to the government is really under their jurisdiction. I agree
it is really fine slicing the words but there have been constitutional
cases land at the SCOTUS with less.
It is like the world series, I really do not have a dog in the fight,
I am not really watching but I will look to see it came out.
Maybe they should have been asking Kavanaugh more about immigration
than whether he groped a girl when he was a teenager.
  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,553
Default Abrogate the 14th?

wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 15:10:33 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

POTUS Pig Vomit wants to kill the 14th Amendment, the one that says:

"???Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and
subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States
and of the State wherein they reside."

You just know that Orange Asshole has never read the Constitution and if
he does ever read it, he won't understand it.


Trump is not the first one to question what "Under the jurisdiction of
the US" really means. I heard it discussed in the 90s when Clinton was
on the anti immigration bandwagon and it has popped up a number of
times since then. The question is whether an "illegal" who is here
under a false identity or living in the underground economy and
unknown to the government is really under their jurisdiction. I agree
it is really fine slicing the words but there have been constitutional
cases land at the SCOTUS with less.
It is like the world series, I really do not have a dog in the fight,
I am not really watching but I will look to see it came out.
Maybe they should have been asking Kavanaugh more about immigration
than whether he groped a girl when he was a teenager.


As Harry states, words have meaning.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pacific Singlehanded Sailing Association meeting Monday 14th [email protected] Cruising 2 August 14th 06 04:46 AM
Pacific Singlehanded Sailing Association meeting Monday 14th [email protected] ASA 0 August 12th 06 09:02 PM
Pacific Singlehanded Sailing Association meeting Monday 14th [email protected] General 0 August 12th 06 09:00 PM
Fishing near Shallotte NC on Apr 14th? DSK General 9 April 19th 04 05:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017