Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 17:52:07 -0400,
wrote: On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 16:38:04 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 13:16:46 -0400, John H. wrote: On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 11:36:26 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 06:14:55 -0400, John H. wrote: Mine's not Bluetooth, which may be why it works very well: https://smile.amazon.com/Wireless-He...A3BT0DBLJQEM25 I notice that says "low latency", not "no latency". I guess the analog to digital conversion takes some time. I am going to track down the buffer size setting on my PC and see how low I can get away with. I know my 900mz set seems to broadcast in real time but it is analog. Going through the PC, I do have some latency if it goes through the mixer but if it is set to "solo" it is straight through. Whatever latency may exist is lower than my latency perception threshold. I guess that is the advantage of generic 2.4 gz over Bluetooth, even though they share the same basic bandwidth. I know I prefer my 2.4gz Logitech desktop devices over the blue tooth ones I have. The only advantage Bluetooth has is a resident hub in my laptops instead of plugging in a dongle. === Have you noticed any latency difference with noise reduction turned on or off? I haven't tried it with NR on. Our Samsung "Smart TV" has an audio latency adjustment. I'm guessing that they do it by delaying the video by some number of milliseconds. I really haven't looked but I do have a Samsung. That is really my wife's TV and she does all of the futzing on it. I bet everything is set to default ;-) |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ping: Dr. Happy Tooth | General | |||
Ping: Dr. Happy Tooth | General | |||
Ping: Dr. Happy Tooth | General | |||
Dr. Happy Tooth | General |