A federal judge ordered Hillary Clinton today to testify in person
and under oath on issues regarding her emails and use of a
private server.

U.S. District Court judge Royce Lamberth issued the order today,
citing that her previous, written testimony and answers
were "incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory,"

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

Mr. Luddite wrote:


A federal judge ordered Hillary Clinton today to testify in person
and under oath on issues regarding her emails and use of a
private server.

U.S. District Court judge Royce Lamberth issued the order today,
citing that her previous, written testimony and answers
were "incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory,"


Yawn.

Keyser Soze wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote:


A federal judge ordered Hillary Clinton today to testify in person
and under oath on issues regarding her emails and use of a
private server.

U.S. District Court judge Royce Lamberth issued the order today,
citing that her previous, written testimony and answers
were "incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory,"


Yawn.



So, is Okay for a Democrat to flaunt the law.

Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote:


A federal judge ordered Hillary Clinton today to testify in person
and under oath on issues regarding her emails and use of a
private server.

U.S. District Court judge Royce Lamberth issued the order today,
citing that her previous, written testimony and answers
were "incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory,"


Yawn.



So, is Okay for a Democrat to flaunt the law.



The notes are under trump’s tax returns

On 3/2/2020 7:04 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote:


A federal judge ordered Hillary Clinton today to testify in person
and under oath on issues regarding her emails and use of a
private server.

U.S. District Court judge Royce Lamberth issued the order today,
citing that her previous, written testimony and answers
were "incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory,"


Yawn.



So, is Okay for a Democrat to flaunt the law.





The notes are under trump’s tax returns


Like it or not, there is no legal requirement for a POTUS or
party nominee for POTUS to release tax returns. Most do,
but it's voluntary.

Lying under oath and/or destroying subpoenaed evidence *is* a crime.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

Keyser Soze wrote:
Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote:


A federal judge ordered Hillary Clinton today to testify in person
and under oath on issues regarding her emails and use of a
private server.

U.S. District Court judge Royce Lamberth issued the order today,
citing that her previous, written testimony and answers
were "incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory,"


Yawn.



So, is Okay for a Democrat to flaunt the law.



The notes are under trump’s tax returns



Where is it a crime to not release your tax returns? Destroying evidence
is.

In article , says...

A federal judge ordered Hillary Clinton today to testify in person
and under oath on issues regarding her emails and use of a
private server.

U.S. District Court judge Royce Lamberth issued the order today,
citing that her previous, written testimony and answers
were "incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory,"

Benghazi! Benghazi! Benghazi!

Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says...

A federal judge ordered Hillary Clinton today to testify in person
and under oath on issues regarding her emails and use of a
private server.

U.S. District Court judge Royce Lamberth issued the order today,
citing that her previous, written testimony and answers
were "incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory,"

Benghazi! Benghazi! Benghazi!


Lies, bribes, destroyed evidence.