WaIIy wrote:
WASHINGTON (AP) - Linda Tripp will get more than $595,000 from the
Defense Department to settle a lawsuit over the release of confidential
personal information about her to a magazine, her lawyers said Monday.


There's no end to the GOP raid on the treasury. Ms. Tripp is slime. Just
like you.

--
Email sent to will never reach me.
New photos of Yo Ho now posted:

http://f1.pg.photos.yahoo.com/hakrause

On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 00:46:33 GMT, WaIIy
wrote:

WASHINGTON (AP) - Linda Tripp will get more than $595,000 from the
Defense Department to settle a lawsuit over the release of confidential
personal information about her to a magazine, her lawyers said Monday.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20031103/D7UJE33G0.html

Unfortunately, the slimeballs (clintonites) who released the info are
not brought to justice.

Ahhh, but Linda Tripp will still be Linda Tripp. I don't think there
are many about who would take the money if they also had to be Linda
Tripp in real life. Justice indeed.

bb

"K Smith" wrote in message
...
WaIIy wrote:
WASHINGTON (AP) - Linda Tripp will get more than $595,000 from the
Defense Department to settle a lawsuit over the release of confidential
personal information about her to a magazine, her lawyers said Monday.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20031103/D7UJE33G0.html

Unfortunately, the slimeballs (clintonites) who released the info are
not brought to justice.

Wally thanks for the links instead of the full pastes, they're at least
a bit considerate.


Ta Muchly,

K

Yup, in 2 weeks the story will drop off the web and this will be a dead
link.
Anybody pulling a Skippy to see who said what will not be able to see what
the fuss was all about.

Mark Browne.
PS - not that it matters very much.

Mark Browne wrote:

"K Smith" wrote in message
...
WaIIy wrote:
WASHINGTON (AP) - Linda Tripp will get more than $595,000 from the
Defense Department to settle a lawsuit over the release of confidential
personal information about her to a magazine, her lawyers said Monday.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20031103/D7UJE33G0.html

Unfortunately, the slimeballs (clintonites) who released the info are
not brought to justice.

Wally thanks for the links instead of the full pastes, they're at least
a bit considerate.


Ta Muchly,

K

Yup, in 2 weeks the story will drop off the web and this will be a dead
link.
Anybody pulling a Skippy to see who said what will not be able to see what
the fuss was all about.

Mark Browne.
PS - not that it matters very much.




hmmm...




Let's see what happens...will she drop off the web and become a dead link?


--
Email sent to will never reach me.

WaIIy wrote:
WASHINGTON (AP) - Linda Tripp will get more than $595,000 from the
Defense Department to settle a lawsuit over the release of confidential
personal information about her to a magazine, her lawyers said Monday.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20031103/D7UJE33G0.html

Unfortunately, the slimeballs (clintonites) who released the info are
not brought to justice.

Wally thanks for the links instead of the full pastes, they're at least
a bit considerate.


Ta Muchly,

K

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
WaIIy wrote:
WASHINGTON (AP) - Linda Tripp will get more than $595,000 from the
Defense Department to settle a lawsuit over the release of confidential
personal information about her to a magazine, her lawyers said Monday.


There's no end to the GOP raid on the treasury. Ms. Tripp is slime. Just
like you.

--
Email sent to will never reach me.
New photos of Yo Ho now posted:

http://f1.pg.photos.yahoo.com/hakrause


How much went to Randy Weaver? and no one went to jail on that one either.

On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 19:48:30 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

WaIIy wrote:
WASHINGTON (AP) - Linda Tripp will get more than $595,000 from the
Defense Department to settle a lawsuit over the release of confidential
personal information about her to a magazine, her lawyers said Monday.


There's no end to the GOP raid on the treasury. Ms. Tripp is slime. Just
like you.

Now Harry, Linda Tripp just didn't like *any* hanky panky in the White
House. It just didn't get the same coverage when it was Mr. Family Values
himself.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/arti...12/55616.shtml

I see you condone private employee records passed around like popcorn.
Oh, wait, only if done by leftists.



Just like running to the authorities with conversations you secretly taped all
the while a friend was confiding about a personal matter? That's a fine thing
to do, as long as it damages the left?

What Tripp did was as "immoral" as what Clinton did. Now, I don't expect the
radical right to agree with that. She didn't get any of the "nasty" parts of
her body involved in the process, except her nasty mind.

Now Harry, Linda Tripp just didn't like *any* hanky panky in the White
House. It just didn't get the same coverage when it was Mr. Family Values
himself.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/arti...12/55616.shtml

How dare you post such a link? Pure speculation! No Proof! Where are the color
photos of bush? Rumors like this are simply left-wing propaganda designed to
undermine our war in Iraq and hasten the day that the terrorist army conquers
America! Republicans never have sex unless specifically trying to make a baby,
and implying that the Commander in Chief,
a Republican Commander in Chief no less,
would ever be less than totally resolute in his marriage vows is a low down,
dirty, socialist trick!

On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 14:15:22 +0000, Gould 0738 wrote:

Now Harry, Linda Tripp just didn't like *any* hanky panky in the White
House. It just didn't get the same coverage when it was Mr. Family
Values himself.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/arti...12/55616.shtml

How dare you post such a link? Pure speculation! No Proof! Where are the
color photos of bush? Rumors like this are simply left-wing propaganda
designed to undermine our war in Iraq and hasten the day that the
terrorist army conquers America! Republicans never have sex unless
specifically trying to make a baby, and implying that the Commander in
Chief, a Republican Commander in Chief no less, would ever be less than
totally resolute in his marriage vows is a low down, dirty, socialist
trick!

I sorry. I wouldn't of believed it myself, if it had been some left wing
rag like the New York Times, but Newsmax . . . if just has to be true.