|
A betting game
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:06:38 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 4/20/20 12:53 PM, wrote: On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:28:10 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Listening to the leader of the left pack, Nancy Pelosi, it's obvious what Dems are counting on. They have nothing to lose. They are making a big deal out of the push to restart the economy by Trump, hoping upon hope that it backfires and causes a resurgence of covid-19 cases. If that happens to a significant degree, Trump is toast in November. They will go on the attack reminding everyone that they said the economy should not be restarted until the entire nation was tested and covid-19 was gone. I am sure that even many Dems privately recognize that relaxing some of the "stay at home" recommendations in order to get the economy going again is as important (if not more so long term) than the containment of the virus. It's a balancing act. However, Trump's focus on the economy presents them with the perfect political strategy for his defeat in November. I was also thinking about Biden and his running mate selection. He has already committed to picking a woman. If he and the Dems were smart they should pick Tulsi Gabbard. Of all the potential Democrats, she would receive the most support of Independents and even some Republicans. If he chooses any of the others (Warren, Harris, Klobuchar, etc.) the political division of the nation and voters doesn't change at all. Republicans are going to support Trump and Dems are going to support Biden. Tulsi Gabbard as his running mate could swing the election in his favor. People will really need to look hard at who runs with Biden. Even if you ignore the "Curse of Tippecanoe", Biden's mental and physical health is an issue. There is a very good chance the VP will ascend. It should be noted, most of the worst presidents ever came after the death of the sitting president. Your boy Trump, who tips the scale at 325+ and has obvious cognitive problems, will go first. Biden has a lifelong stuttering problem. You didn't mind that fat **** Clinton so weight shouldn't be an issue. I doubt Johnson wanted to be seen on a scale either. The problem is that his brain stutters too. He is an old **** with dementia, perhaps the early stages of alzheimer. We already had that with Reagan in his last term. I am not sure we need it again. This could very well end up being a rerun of the Wilson administration where his wife was running the government for a number of years. |
A betting game
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:25:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 4/20/2020 12:53 PM, wrote: On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:28:10 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Listening to the leader of the left pack, Nancy Pelosi, it's obvious what Dems are counting on. They have nothing to lose. They are making a big deal out of the push to restart the economy by Trump, hoping upon hope that it backfires and causes a resurgence of covid-19 cases. If that happens to a significant degree, Trump is toast in November. They will go on the attack reminding everyone that they said the economy should not be restarted until the entire nation was tested and covid-19 was gone. I am sure that even many Dems privately recognize that relaxing some of the "stay at home" recommendations in order to get the economy going again is as important (if not more so long term) than the containment of the virus. It's a balancing act. However, Trump's focus on the economy presents them with the perfect political strategy for his defeat in November. I was also thinking about Biden and his running mate selection. He has already committed to picking a woman. If he and the Dems were smart they should pick Tulsi Gabbard. Of all the potential Democrats, she would receive the most support of Independents and even some Republicans. If he chooses any of the others (Warren, Harris, Klobuchar, etc.) the political division of the nation and voters doesn't change at all. Republicans are going to support Trump and Dems are going to support Biden. Tulsi Gabbard as his running mate could swing the election in his favor. People will really need to look hard at who runs with Biden. Even if you ignore the "Curse of Tippecanoe", Biden's mental and physical health is an issue. There is a very good chance the VP will ascend. It should be noted, most of the worst presidents ever came after the death of the sitting president. Biden has said it will be a woman. Of the semi-obvious choices .... which one would you rather see as being a heart beat away? I'd pick Gabbard. Others might pick Klobuchar. The rest of the obvious are just way too left. Harry is probably hoping for Hillary in his heart but I assume Harris would make him happy. I doubt Fauxohontas would really help Biden that much. They will be rerunning video of her calling him a tool of the corporations throughout the campaign. |
A betting game
On 4/20/20 2:03 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:25:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 4/20/2020 12:53 PM, wrote: On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:28:10 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Listening to the leader of the left pack, Nancy Pelosi, it's obvious what Dems are counting on. They have nothing to lose. They are making a big deal out of the push to restart the economy by Trump, hoping upon hope that it backfires and causes a resurgence of covid-19 cases. If that happens to a significant degree, Trump is toast in November. They will go on the attack reminding everyone that they said the economy should not be restarted until the entire nation was tested and covid-19 was gone. I am sure that even many Dems privately recognize that relaxing some of the "stay at home" recommendations in order to get the economy going again is as important (if not more so long term) than the containment of the virus. It's a balancing act. However, Trump's focus on the economy presents them with the perfect political strategy for his defeat in November. I was also thinking about Biden and his running mate selection. He has already committed to picking a woman. If he and the Dems were smart they should pick Tulsi Gabbard. Of all the potential Democrats, she would receive the most support of Independents and even some Republicans. If he chooses any of the others (Warren, Harris, Klobuchar, etc.) the political division of the nation and voters doesn't change at all. Republicans are going to support Trump and Dems are going to support Biden. Tulsi Gabbard as his running mate could swing the election in his favor. People will really need to look hard at who runs with Biden. Even if you ignore the "Curse of Tippecanoe", Biden's mental and physical health is an issue. There is a very good chance the VP will ascend. It should be noted, most of the worst presidents ever came after the death of the sitting president. Biden has said it will be a woman. Of the semi-obvious choices .... which one would you rather see as being a heart beat away? I'd pick Gabbard. Others might pick Klobuchar. The rest of the obvious are just way too left. Harry is probably hoping for Hillary in his heart but I assume Harris would make him happy. I doubt Fauxohontas would really help Biden that much. They will be rerunning video of her calling him a tool of the corporations throughout the campaign. As usual, you are wrong regarding Ms. Clinton. I think Harris or Klobuchar would be an asset to the ticket, and either would make a first-class POTUS if it became necessary. -- MAGA - Manipulating America's Gullible Assholes |
A betting game
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/20/20 2:03 PM, wrote: On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:25:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 4/20/2020 12:53 PM, wrote: On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:28:10 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Listening to the leader of the left pack, Nancy Pelosi, it's obvious what Dems are counting on. They have nothing to lose. They are making a big deal out of the push to restart the economy by Trump, hoping upon hope that it backfires and causes a resurgence of covid-19 cases. If that happens to a significant degree, Trump is toast in November. They will go on the attack reminding everyone that they said the economy should not be restarted until the entire nation was tested and covid-19 was gone. I am sure that even many Dems privately recognize that relaxing some of the "stay at home" recommendations in order to get the economy going again is as important (if not more so long term) than the containment of the virus. It's a balancing act. However, Trump's focus on the economy presents them with the perfect political strategy for his defeat in November. I was also thinking about Biden and his running mate selection. He has already committed to picking a woman. If he and the Dems were smart they should pick Tulsi Gabbard. Of all the potential Democrats, she would receive the most support of Independents and even some Republicans. If he chooses any of the others (Warren, Harris, Klobuchar, etc.) the political division of the nation and voters doesn't change at all. Republicans are going to support Trump and Dems are going to support Biden. Tulsi Gabbard as his running mate could swing the election in his favor. People will really need to look hard at who runs with Biden. Even if you ignore the "Curse of Tippecanoe", Biden's mental and physical health is an issue. There is a very good chance the VP will ascend. It should be noted, most of the worst presidents ever came after the death of the sitting president. Biden has said it will be a woman. Of the semi-obvious choices .... which one would you rather see as being a heart beat away? I'd pick Gabbard. Others might pick Klobuchar. The rest of the obvious are just way too left. Harry is probably hoping for Hillary in his heart but I assume Harris would make him happy. I doubt Fauxohontas would really help Biden that much. They will be rerunning video of her calling him a tool of the corporations throughout the campaign. As usual, you are wrong regarding Ms. Clinton. I think Harris or Klobuchar would be an asset to the ticket, and either would make a first-class POTUS if it became necessary. Harris is even ridiculed in California as incompetent as the AG, why would you think she would be a good President? She has three things going for her, Democrat, Female, color. |
A betting game
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:08:43 -0000 (UTC), Bill
wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/20/20 2:03 PM, wrote: On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:25:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 4/20/2020 12:53 PM, wrote: On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:28:10 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Listening to the leader of the left pack, Nancy Pelosi, it's obvious what Dems are counting on. They have nothing to lose. They are making a big deal out of the push to restart the economy by Trump, hoping upon hope that it backfires and causes a resurgence of covid-19 cases. If that happens to a significant degree, Trump is toast in November. They will go on the attack reminding everyone that they said the economy should not be restarted until the entire nation was tested and covid-19 was gone. I am sure that even many Dems privately recognize that relaxing some of the "stay at home" recommendations in order to get the economy going again is as important (if not more so long term) than the containment of the virus. It's a balancing act. However, Trump's focus on the economy presents them with the perfect political strategy for his defeat in November. I was also thinking about Biden and his running mate selection. He has already committed to picking a woman. If he and the Dems were smart they should pick Tulsi Gabbard. Of all the potential Democrats, she would receive the most support of Independents and even some Republicans. If he chooses any of the others (Warren, Harris, Klobuchar, etc.) the political division of the nation and voters doesn't change at all. Republicans are going to support Trump and Dems are going to support Biden. Tulsi Gabbard as his running mate could swing the election in his favor. People will really need to look hard at who runs with Biden. Even if you ignore the "Curse of Tippecanoe", Biden's mental and physical health is an issue. There is a very good chance the VP will ascend. It should be noted, most of the worst presidents ever came after the death of the sitting president. Biden has said it will be a woman. Of the semi-obvious choices .... which one would you rather see as being a heart beat away? I'd pick Gabbard. Others might pick Klobuchar. The rest of the obvious are just way too left. Harry is probably hoping for Hillary in his heart but I assume Harris would make him happy. I doubt Fauxohontas would really help Biden that much. They will be rerunning video of her calling him a tool of the corporations throughout the campaign. As usual, you are wrong regarding Ms. Clinton. I think Harris or Klobuchar would be an asset to the ticket, and either would make a first-class POTUS if it became necessary. Harris is even ridiculed in California as incompetent as the AG, why would you think she would be a good President? She has three things going for her, Democrat, Female, color. That is all Harry cares about. He thinks Maxine Waters is a genius. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com