| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#12
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Ronald Reagan's Humor on Display
On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:51:34 -0400,
wrote: On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 16:31:36 -0000 (UTC), Justan wrote: On 9/8/20 10:59 AM, wrote: On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:07:31 -0000 (UTC), Justan wrote: On 9/8/20 8:40 AM, wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 07:37:01 -0400, John wrote: On Mon, 07 Sep 2020 17:59:42 -0400, wrote: I'd forgotten just how good he was until I watched this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pgs-LaWyUJI What a pleasant contrast. Imagine that, presidential leadership without threats, ridicule, childish insults and inarticulate muttering. Reagan got a lot accomplished that way, by uniting peopl and reaching consensus on what needed to be done. What a pleasan contras Are you taking over? -- === Taking over what? Am I the only conservative on this group that has a problem with presidential lying, threats, ridicule, childish insults and inarticulate muttering? Be careful what you ask for. Sad that a fella like Trump is our best hope for a future this election cycle. The democrats should scour the party for a formidable candidate for 2024. Joe will be a 3 time loser this year. 78, 08, and 20. Three strikes you're out. === It is sad, and I view him as not only a threat to constitutional democracy, but also a threat to the Republican party. Moderate republicans need to take back the party from the lunatic fringe. I'm willing to support Biden just to send that message. That's a bit extreme, don't you think? === Not in my opinion. I view Biden as a moderate who is not given to extreme ideology. Harris is an intelligent woman with a track record of being tough on crime. I'm hoping that between the two of them they could tone down the extremist and divisive rhetoric. That could go a long way towards healing and uniting the country. From the National review article. "Hillary Clinton is 70. She, 69-year-old Elizabeth Warren, 75-year-old Joe Biden, and 77-year-old Bernie Sanders are the party’s liveliest, most dynamic figures, right up there with its Capitol Hill leaders: 78-year-old Nancy Pelosi, 79-year-old Steny Hoyer, and 85-year-old Dianne Feinstein, who is running for reelection. If the party is going to reimplement the New Deal, why shouldn’t it be led by people who lived through it?" You have to ask how much will they do that they haven't been able to do in around 100 years of combined public service? |
|
#13
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ronald Reagan's Humor on Display
On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 14:14:19 -0400, John wrote:
On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 09:40:04 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 07:37:01 -0400, John wrote: On Mon, 07 Sep 2020 17:59:42 -0400, wrote: I'd forgotten just how good he was until I watched this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pgs-LaWyUJI What a pleasant contrast. Imagine that, presidential leadership without threats, ridicule, childish insults and inarticulate muttering. Reagan got a lot accomplished that way, by uniting people and reaching consensus on what needed to be done. What a pleasant contrast. Are you taking over? -- === Taking over what? Am I the only conservative on this group that has a problem with presidential lying, threats, ridicule, childish insults and inarticulate muttering? Be careful what you ask for. If you had had to put up with the total resistance of the Democrats in Congress, who give not a **** for this country, what frame of mind would you be in? For one who has seen everything he tries to do thwarted by Pelosi and Schumer only because the president is Donald Trump, I think he's done pretty damn well. Trump was never given a chance to 'unite and reach consensus'. He was facing a 'resist' movement before he took the oath. Pelosi is holding up another aid package. Why? Because Trump wants it. Amen. **** 'em, I say. And Trump agrees. I don't blame him. -- === Much of that resistance is because of the way he comports himself, constantly playing to his base instead oy trying to build grass roots consensus. It's called leadership, and the lack of it will be his downfall. -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com |
|
#14
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ronald Reagan's Humor on Display
wrote:
On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 14:14:19 -0400, John wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 09:40:04 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 07:37:01 -0400, John wrote: On Mon, 07 Sep 2020 17:59:42 -0400, wrote: I'd forgotten just how good he was until I watched this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pgs-LaWyUJI What a pleasant contrast. Imagine that, presidential leadership without threats, ridicule, childish insults and inarticulate muttering. Reagan got a lot accomplished that way, by uniting people and reaching consensus on what needed to be done. What a pleasant contrast. Are you taking over? -- === Taking over what? Am I the only conservative on this group that has a problem with presidential lying, threats, ridicule, childish insults and inarticulate muttering? Be careful what you ask for. If you had had to put up with the total resistance of the Democrats in Congress, who give not a **** for this country, what frame of mind would you be in? For one who has seen everything he tries to do thwarted by Pelosi and Schumer only because the president is Donald Trump, I think he's done pretty damn well. Trump was never given a chance to 'unite and reach consensus'. He was facing a 'resist' movement before he took the oath. Pelosi is holding up another aid package. Why? Because Trump wants it. Amen. **** 'em, I say. And Trump agrees. I don't blame him. -- === Much of that resistance is because of the way he comports himself, constantly playing to his base instead oy trying to build grass roots consensus. It's called leadership, and the lack of it will be his downfall. His leadership wants, but Nancy and Chuck, seem to be working for the DNC and a single party system. Not looking at what is good for the country. As to Biden, I think he lacks any major thinking power, and I disliked Kamala when she was the state AG. Seemed to be in the bottom 4 of all the AG’s. Her tough on crime seemed to **** off a lot of Blacks here. Going for major time, for minor crimes. Appease the tough on crime group, and no consideration of crime or results, also, when they had Proposition 8, the one man one women description of marriage, she refused to defend it in the Supreme Court. Her job was to represent the people of the state of California, not her personal viewpoint. Should have been disbarred for that since she did not recuse herself. I did not vote for Prop 8, but the majority did. Just like any attorney, defend your client, even if you hate the *******. |
|
#15
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ronald Reagan's Humor on Display
On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 18:04:31 -0400,
wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 14:14:19 -0400, John wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 09:40:04 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 07:37:01 -0400, John wrote: On Mon, 07 Sep 2020 17:59:42 -0400, wrote: I'd forgotten just how good he was until I watched this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pgs-LaWyUJI What a pleasant contrast. Imagine that, presidential leadership without threats, ridicule, childish insults and inarticulate muttering. Reagan got a lot accomplished that way, by uniting people and reaching consensus on what needed to be done. What a pleasant contrast. Are you taking over? -- === Taking over what? Am I the only conservative on this group that has a problem with presidential lying, threats, ridicule, childish insults and inarticulate muttering? Be careful what you ask for. If you had had to put up with the total resistance of the Democrats in Congress, who give not a **** for this country, what frame of mind would you be in? For one who has seen everything he tries to do thwarted by Pelosi and Schumer only because the president is Donald Trump, I think he's done pretty damn well. Trump was never given a chance to 'unite and reach consensus'. He was facing a 'resist' movement before he took the oath. Pelosi is holding up another aid package. Why? Because Trump wants it. Amen. **** 'em, I say. And Trump agrees. I don't blame him. -- === Much of that resistance is because of the way he comports himself, constantly playing to his base instead oy trying to build grass roots consensus. It's called leadership, and the lack of it will be his downfall. It seems to be working for him so far. The test is in November but his fans are going to show up. BTW did you see we had the largest boat parade in history, rivaling Dunkirk and D Day the other day right here. It was a Trump event ... 11,000 boats according to the Snooze Press. https://www.news-press.com/story/news/2020/09/07/trump-boat-parade-southwest-florida-record-guinness-world-records-support-america-flotilla/5738351002/?fbclid=IwAR1xz_Opy6WjQ-S8q-tpK-fHKed-PgWZrLSuNSTamzRd3S4TRDzf7zTKFPU |
|
#16
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ronald Reagan's Humor on Display
On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 18:04:31 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 14:14:19 -0400, John wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 09:40:04 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 07:37:01 -0400, John wrote: On Mon, 07 Sep 2020 17:59:42 -0400, wrote: I'd forgotten just how good he was until I watched this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pgs-LaWyUJI What a pleasant contrast. Imagine that, presidential leadership without threats, ridicule, childish insults and inarticulate muttering. Reagan got a lot accomplished that way, by uniting people and reaching consensus on what needed to be done. What a pleasant contrast. Are you taking over? -- === Taking over what? Am I the only conservative on this group that has a problem with presidential lying, threats, ridicule, childish insults and inarticulate muttering? Be careful what you ask for. If you had had to put up with the total resistance of the Democrats in Congress, who give not a **** for this country, what frame of mind would you be in? For one who has seen everything he tries to do thwarted by Pelosi and Schumer only because the president is Donald Trump, I think he's done pretty damn well. Trump was never given a chance to 'unite and reach consensus'. He was facing a 'resist' movement before he took the oath. Pelosi is holding up another aid package. Why? Because Trump wants it. Amen. **** 'em, I say. And Trump agrees. I don't blame him. -- === Much of that resistance is because of the way he comports himself, constantly playing to his base instead oy trying to build grass roots consensus. It's called leadership, and the lack of it will be his downfall. Most of that resistance was there the day he won the election, if not before. -- Freedom Isn't Free! |
|
#17
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ronald Reagan's Humor on Display
On 9/8/20 8:22 PM, Bill wrote:
wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 14:14:19 -0400, John wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 09:40:04 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 07:37:01 -0400, John wrote: On Mon, 07 Sep 2020 17:59:42 -0400, wrote: I'd forgotten just how good he was until I watched this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pgs-LaWyUJI What a pleasant contrast. Imagine that, presidential leadership without threats, ridicule, childish insults and inarticulate muttering. Reagan got a lot accomplished that way, by uniting people and reaching consensus on what needed to be done. What a pleasant contrast. Are you taking over? -- === Taking over what? Am I the only conservative on this group that has a problem with presidential lying, threats, ridicule, childish insults and inarticulate muttering? Be careful what you ask for. If you had had to put up with the total resistance of the Democrats in Congress, who give not a **** for this country, what frame of mind would you be in? For one who has seen everything he tries to do thwarted by Pelosi and Schumer only because the president is Donald Trump, I think he's done pretty damn well. Trump was never given a chance to 'unite and reach consensus'. He was facing a 'resist' movement before he took the oath. Pelosi is holding up another aid package. Why? Because Trump wants it. Amen. **** 'em, I say. And Trump agrees. I don't blame him. -- === Much of that resistance is because of the way he comports himself, constantly playing to his base instead oy trying to build grass roots consensus. It's called leadership, and the lack of it will be his downfall. His leadership wants, but Nancy and Chuck, seem to be working for the DNC and a single party system. Not looking at what is good for the country. As to Biden, I think he lacks any major thinking power, and I disliked Kamala when she was the state AG. Seemed to be in the bottom 4 of all the AG?s. Her tough on crime seemed to **** off a lot of Blacks here. Going for major time, for minor crimes. Appease the tough on crime group, and no consideration of crime or results, also, when they had Proposition 8, the one man one women description of marriage, she refused to defend it in the Supreme Court. Her job was to represent the people of the state of California, not her personal viewpoint. Should have been disbarred for that since she did not recuse herself. I did not vote for Prop 8, but the majority did. Just like any attorney, defend your client, even if you hate the *******. Didn't she sleep around to bolster her career? |
|
#18
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ronald Reagan's Humor on Display
On Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 8:19:28 AM UTC-4, Justan wrote:
On 9/8/20 8:22 PM, Bill wrote: wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 14:14:19 -0400, John wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 09:40:04 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 07:37:01 -0400, John wrote: On Mon, 07 Sep 2020 17:59:42 -0400, wrote: I'd forgotten just how good he was until I watched this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pgs-LaWyUJI What a pleasant contrast. Imagine that, presidential leadership without threats, ridicule, childish insults and inarticulate muttering. Reagan got a lot accomplished that way, by uniting people and reaching consensus on what needed to be done. What a pleasant contrast. Are you taking over? -- === Taking over what? Am I the only conservative on this group that has a problem with presidential lying, threats, ridicule, childish insults and inarticulate muttering? Be careful what you ask for. If you had had to put up with the total resistance of the Democrats in Congress, who give not a **** for this country, what frame of mind would you be in? For one who has seen everything he tries to do thwarted by Pelosi and Schumer only because the president is Donald Trump, I think he's done pretty damn well. Trump was never given a chance to 'unite and reach consensus'. He was facing a 'resist' movement before he took the oath. Pelosi is holding up another aid package. Why? Because Trump wants it.. Amen. **** 'em, I say. And Trump agrees. I don't blame him. -- === Much of that resistance is because of the way he comports himself, constantly playing to his base instead oy trying to build grass roots consensus. It's called leadership, and the lack of it will be his downfall. His leadership wants, but Nancy and Chuck, seem to be working for the DNC and a single party system. Not looking at what is good for the country. As to Biden, I think he lacks any major thinking power, and I disliked Kamala when she was the state AG. Seemed to be in the bottom 4 of all the AG?s. Her tough on crime seemed to **** off a lot of Blacks here. Going for major time, for minor crimes. Appease the tough on crime group, and no consideration of crime or results, also, when they had Proposition 8, the one man one women description of marriage, she refused to defend it in the Supreme Court. Her job was to represent the people of the state of California, not her personal viewpoint. Should have been disbarred for that since she did not recuse herself. I did not vote for Prop 8, but the majority did. Just like any attorney, defend your client, even if you hate the *******. Didn't she sleep around to bolster her career? She certainly flip-flopped on her stance on crime to fit the current political situation. The police didn't like her because she refused to go after a cop killer with the death penalty. She also tried to cover up the theft and mishandling of evidence by someone in the DA's office which resulted in nearly 1000 cases being thrown out. And she created a public database to highlight "police injustice". She's way to liberal, and Joe is far too feeble-minded. It's almost like the DNC wants to lose. |
|
#19
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ronald Reagan's Humor on Display
Justan wrote:
On 9/8/20 8:22 PM, Bill wrote: wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 14:14:19 -0400, John wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 09:40:04 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 07:37:01 -0400, John wrote: On Mon, 07 Sep 2020 17:59:42 -0400, wrote: I'd forgotten just how good he was until I watched this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pgs-LaWyUJI What a pleasant contrast. Imagine that, presidential leadership without threats, ridicule, childish insults and inarticulate muttering. Reagan got a lot accomplished that way, by uniting people and reaching consensus on what needed to be done. What a pleasant contrast. Are you taking over? -- === Taking over what? Am I the only conservative on this group that has a problem with presidential lying, threats, ridicule, childish insults and inarticulate muttering? Be careful what you ask for. If you had had to put up with the total resistance of the Democrats in Congress, who give not a **** for this country, what frame of mind would you be in? For one who has seen everything he tries to do thwarted by Pelosi and Schumer only because the president is Donald Trump, I think he's done pretty damn well. Trump was never given a chance to 'unite and reach consensus'. He was facing a 'resist' movement before he took the oath. Pelosi is holding up another aid package. Why? Because Trump wants it. Amen. **** 'em, I say. And Trump agrees. I don't blame him. -- === Much of that resistance is because of the way he comports himself, constantly playing to his base instead oy trying to build grass roots consensus. It's called leadership, and the lack of it will be his downfall. His leadership wants, but Nancy and Chuck, seem to be working for the DNC and a single party system. Not looking at what is good for the country. As to Biden, I think he lacks any major thinking power, and I disliked Kamala when she was the state AG. Seemed to be in the bottom 4 of all the AG?s. Her tough on crime seemed to **** off a lot of Blacks here. Going for major time, for minor crimes. Appease the tough on crime group, and no consideration of crime or results, also, when they had Proposition 8, the one man one women description of marriage, she refused to defend it in the Supreme Court. Her job was to represent the people of the state of California, not her personal viewpoint. Should have been disbarred for that since she did not recuse herself. I did not vote for Prop 8, but the majority did. Just like any attorney, defend your client, even if you hate the *******. Didn't she sleep around to bolster her career? Does not matter. She and Biden claim she overcame being black to get an education. Her mom is a multi PhD, and she went to mostly private schools. She claims the republicans were bad for stopping forced busing. One of the worst things we did to minorities. Instead of spend the money on better teachers in their neighborhoods, and better schools, they moved them to schools where they were at least a year behind in knowledge. |
|
#20
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ronald Reagan's Humor on Display
On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 18:04:31 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 14:14:19 -0400, John wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 09:40:04 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 07:37:01 -0400, John wrote: On Mon, 07 Sep 2020 17:59:42 -0400, wrote: I'd forgotten just how good he was until I watched this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pgs-LaWyUJI What a pleasant contrast. Imagine that, presidential leadership without threats, ridicule, childish insults and inarticulate muttering. Reagan got a lot accomplished that way, by uniting people and reaching consensus on what needed to be done. What a pleasant contrast. Are you taking over? -- === Taking over what? Am I the only conservative on this group that has a problem with presidential lying, threats, ridicule, childish insults and inarticulate muttering? Be careful what you ask for. If you had had to put up with the total resistance of the Democrats in Congress, who give not a **** for this country, what frame of mind would you be in? For one who has seen everything he tries to do thwarted by Pelosi and Schumer only because the president is Donald Trump, I think he's done pretty damn well. Trump was never given a chance to 'unite and reach consensus'. He was facing a 'resist' movement before he took the oath. Pelosi is holding up another aid package. Why? Because Trump wants it. Amen. **** 'em, I say. And Trump agrees. I don't blame him. -- === Much of that resistance is because of the way he comports himself, constantly playing to his base instead oy trying to build grass roots consensus. It's called leadership, and the lack of it will be his downfall. I agree that the way he comports himself could well be his downfall. That's a shame, because I dread what Biden may do to the country. -- Freedom Isn't Free! |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Ronald Reagan... | General | |||
| Ronald Reagan | General | |||
| Ronald Reagan quote | ASA | |||
| Ronald Reagan's Daughter Praises F 9/11 | ASA | |||
| ( OT) Ronald Reagan R.I.P (But in perspective) | General | |||
![John[_6_] is offline](https://www.boatbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Linear Mode
