On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 15:22:09 GMT, "John Gaquin" wrote:

... made a shambles of commonly excepted protocol,

A protocol is a set of procedures or behaviors

One more thing -- I believe the word you were seeking is "accepted", a
"...commonly accepted protocol...". A "commonly excepted protocol" would
be one routinely disregarded by parties involved, so it would be difficult
to make a shambles of that, no?

I believe he was referring to the protocol by which nations heed resolutions
passed by the UN. In Iraq's case, this was a "commonly excepted protocol". Yes,
Bush made a shambles of it.

So, for once, basskisser was correct. You probably don't owe him an apology,
however.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

"JohnH" wrote in message
...

The revelation that Democrats are using the intelligence committee to
conduct opposition research for the coming presidential campaign demands
an investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee, Hannity said.


Right. Maybe that investigation can begin as soon as the Justice Department
is finished with its "inquiry" into who leaked the identity of the CIA
agent.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"JohnH" wrote in message
...

The revelation that Democrats are using the intelligence committee to
conduct opposition research for the coming presidential campaign demands
an investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee, Hannity said.


Right. Maybe that investigation can begin as soon as the Justice
Department
is finished with its "inquiry" into who leaked the identity of the CIA
agent.

But not until the White House ordered commision on 911 is actually given the
materials requested from the White House. What an incredible case of
footdragging there.

When Bush says something, you can fairly well predict he means exactly the
opposite.

On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 11:51:03 -0800, "jps" wrote:

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"JohnH" wrote in message
...

The revelation that Democrats are using the intelligence committee to
conduct opposition research for the coming presidential campaign demands
an investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee, Hannity said.


Right. Maybe that investigation can begin as soon as the Justice
Department
is finished with its "inquiry" into who leaked the identity of the CIA
agent.

But not until the White House ordered commision on 911 is actually given the
materials requested from the White House. What an incredible case of
footdragging there.

When Bush says something, you can fairly well predict he means exactly the
opposite.

You're not trying to change the subject, are you?

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 11:51:03 -0800, "jps" wrote:

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"JohnH" wrote in message
...

The revelation that Democrats are using the intelligence committee to
conduct opposition research for the coming presidential campaign
demands
an investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee, Hannity said.


Right. Maybe that investigation can begin as soon as the Justice
Department
is finished with its "inquiry" into who leaked the identity of the CIA
agent.

But not until the White House ordered commision on 911 is actually given
the
materials requested from the White House. What an incredible case of
footdragging there.

When Bush says something, you can fairly well predict he means exactly
the
opposite.

You're not trying to change the subject, are you?\

No, just expanding the list of "findings" we're not likely to find.

Hey, as you can tell I'm all about finding a way to get Bush out of office.
The "memo" actually causes me to have a higher view of the democrats in
congress, since they're thinking similarly.

At this point, everything is political fodder and I think all Bush's lies,
missteps, fanatical thinking, obfuscation, cold heartedness, etc. should be
heaped in a giant pile that he can't see over. If the dems are doing their
part in congress, halle****inglujah!!!

I feel the same way about Bush that you all felt about Clinton. It's our
turn to rip the asshole in charge apart.

"jps" wrote in message
...

I feel the same way about Bush that you all felt about Clinton. It's our
turn to rip the asshole in charge apart.

Paybacks, eh?

Sorry, but your guy made an easier target by being a lying sleazeball.

NOYB wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...

I feel the same way about Bush that you all felt about Clinton. It's our
turn to rip the asshole in charge apart.

Paybacks, eh?

Sorry, but your guy made an easier target by being a lying sleazeball.


Bush lies about far more important subjects than his sex life.


--
Email sent to will never reach me.

... made a shambles of commonly excepted protocol,

A protocol is a set of procedures or behaviors

One more thing -- I believe the word you were seeking is "accepted", a
"...commonly accepted protocol...". A "commonly excepted protocol" would
be one routinely disregarded by parties involved, so it would be difficult
to make a shambles of that, no?

On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 13:43:01 -0800, "jps" wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 11:51:03 -0800, "jps" wrote:

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"JohnH" wrote in message
...

The revelation that Democrats are using the intelligence committee to
conduct opposition research for the coming presidential campaign
demands
an investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee, Hannity said.


Right. Maybe that investigation can begin as soon as the Justice
Department
is finished with its "inquiry" into who leaked the identity of the CIA
agent.

But not until the White House ordered commision on 911 is actually given
the
materials requested from the White House. What an incredible case of
footdragging there.

When Bush says something, you can fairly well predict he means exactly
the
opposite.

You're not trying to change the subject, are you?\

No, just expanding the list of "findings" we're not likely to find.

Hey, as you can tell I'm all about finding a way to get Bush out of office.
The "memo" actually causes me to have a higher view of the democrats in
congress, since they're thinking similarly.

At this point, everything is political fodder and I think all Bush's lies,
missteps, fanatical thinking, obfuscation, cold heartedness, etc. should be
heaped in a giant pile that he can't see over. If the dems are doing their
part in congress, halle****inglujah!!!

I feel the same way about Bush that you all felt about Clinton. It's our
turn to rip the asshole in charge apart.

It figures.


John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 18:38:45 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

NOYB wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...

I feel the same way about Bush that you all felt about Clinton. It's our
turn to rip the asshole in charge apart.

Paybacks, eh?

Sorry, but your guy made an easier target by being a lying sleazeball.


Bush lies about far more important subjects than his sex life.

Not!

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD