Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Signatures needed on petition to evaluate and stabilize theArecibo radio telescope
On Saturday, November 28, 2020 at 8:05:24 AM UTC-6, Justan O. wrote:
On 11/28/20 7:50 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/27/20 10:51 PM, wrote: On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 19:26:21 -0500, Wayne B wrote: On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 18:09:45 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:59:12 -0500, Wayne B wrote: Signatures needed on petition to evaluate and stabilize the Arecibo radio telescope: "We urge emergency action to have the Army Corps of Engineers or another agency evaluate the telescope structure and search for a safe way to stabilize it," reads the petition to the White House, which had more than 28,000 signatures as of Friday. Space.com notes if the petition gets 100,000 signees by Dec. 21, the White House has to respond within two months. Jenniffer Gonzalez, Puerto Rico's resident commissioner, is also taking action, sending a letter to Congress last week to request funds to make repairs. The NSF maintains the structure is beyond safe renovation. "We understand the risk of going there and trying to fix it," Wilbert Ruperto-Hernandez, one of the organizers of the "Save the Arecibo Observatory" campaign, tells Space.com. "But not many people think that it should be an excuse to just demolish it." https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/petition-emergency-action-evaluate-and-stabilize-arecibo-radio-telescope You might have to try to get Elon Musk or Bill Gates to cough up $50-100 million. I doubt the government is going to do it. Since this is an international resource, where are the scientists from other countries who used it? === I know nothing about the finances or international aspects. It just seems like a unique resource that is worth preserving. I was working on the technical staff in a research lab at Cornell University back in the 60s when the whole thing was coming online. In the middle of an upstate NY winter, most of us thought Puerto Rico would be a nice gig to have. It's unfortunate that so many jump to politicize the situation. More information he https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arecibo_Observatory I have been reading a little about this and the consensus is, most of the infrastructure is EOL. Salt air and other ravages from the environment has damaged this so badly they might be better off salvaging anything they can and starting over. It might end up being pretty much rebuilding from scratch. They won't have any military connection this time and no DoD money so this might actually be best done by a consortium of private companies. To put it in perspective, if they could raise just 10% of what we spent on this last election (~$1.4 BILLION) they could build a 21st century replacement for a mid 20th century complex with far more capabilities. I agree a new system is a better solution than repairing an out of date system, but it should be built by the government as a government facility using private sector subcontractors. This is the sort of facility that should be used for the public good. Let's not turn it into a damned toll road that profits private enterprise at the expense of the public. Public good, Liberals code word for Gubmint wants control over everything.. You don't have skinning the game anyway. Deadbeat. -- Don't Forget Ukraine. Don't Trust Joe. why would I forget Ukraine and why shouldn't I trust Joe.. Trump hasn't even visited Ukraine you cannot just leave food on doorsteps, someone has to deal with food shortages, hunger, unemployment... Gubmint programs are a good way to do it a box of free food on a door stoop in a ghetto will last about... a minute. Boxes will be stolen, mutilated and and missing daily. Not to mention eaten by stray dogs and cats. Rich people have no idea how poor neighborhoods work. Especially since they don’t even have supermarkets. On the plus side, maybe all of the STUPID poor people who voted for Trump will wake up when they realize they’ve losing their government checks, healthcare, Medicare, Medicaid and social security, because of Trump inaction and his holy “base” approval ratings will FINALLY tank. I mean below the abnormally low 33 percent. How he thinks he could parlay that into a popular or electoral win is a mystery mk5000 Like this in the early lessons, since the promise of learning Is a delusion, and I agreed, adding that Tomorrow would alter the sense of what had already been learned, That the learning process is extended in this way, so that from this standpoint None of us ever graduates from college, Soonest Mended BY JOHN ASHBERY |
#22
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Signatures needed on petition to evaluate and stabilize the Arecibo radio telescope
On Tue, 01 Dec 2020 17:18:08 -0500, Wayne B
wrote: On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 20:09:30 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: John wrote: On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 07:05:41 -0800 (PST), " wrote: On Friday, November 27, 2020 at 2:59:18 PM UTC-5, Wayne B wrote: Signatures needed on petition to evaluate and stabilize the Arecibo radio telescope: "We urge emergency action to have the Army Corps of Engineers or another agency evaluate the telescope structure and search for a safe way to stabilize it," reads the petition to the White House, which had more than 28,000 signatures as of Friday. Space.com notes if the petition gets 100,000 signees by Dec. 21, the White House has to respond within two months. Jenniffer Gonzalez, Puerto Rico's resident commissioner, is also taking action, sending a letter to Congress last week to request funds to make repairs. The NSF maintains the structure is beyond safe renovation. "We understand the risk of going there and trying to fix it," Wilbert Ruperto-Hernandez, one of the organizers of the "Save the Arecibo Observatory" campaign, tells Space.com. "But not many people think that it should be an excuse to just demolish it." https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/petition-emergency-action-evaluate-and-stabilize-arecibo-radio-telescope And just like that, now it's gone... "SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico?A huge, already damaged radio telescope in Puerto Rico that has played a key role in astronomical discoveries for more than half a century completely collapsed on Tuesday. The telescope's 900-ton receiver platform fell onto the reflector dish more than 400 feet below." https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/huge-loss-huge-puerto-rico-radio-telescope-arecibo-collapses-following-n1249515 I reckon that solves that problem. Glad no one was hurt. -- Freedom Isn't Free! With the lack of maintenance, I hope whomever was in charge does not get another management position. === I agree but it's possible there was a funding issue. NSF facilities are constantly struggling for budget dollars. There are newer radio telescopes that have come online since Arecibo was built and they might have had a higher funding priority. There are more capable receivers but Arecibo could also transmit. I agree the best chance will be if some rich people decide to take over the project. If they rebuild this with current technology they would really have something cool. |
#23
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Signatures needed on petition to evaluate and stabilize theArecibo radio telescope
On Tuesday, December 1, 2020 at 6:32:18 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Tue, 01 Dec 2020 17:18:08 -0500, Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 20:09:30 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: John wrote: On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 07:05:41 -0800 (PST), " wrote: On Friday, November 27, 2020 at 2:59:18 PM UTC-5, Wayne B wrote: Signatures needed on petition to evaluate and stabilize the Arecibo radio telescope: "We urge emergency action to have the Army Corps of Engineers or another agency evaluate the telescope structure and search for a safe way to stabilize it," reads the petition to the White House, which had more than 28,000 signatures as of Friday. Space.com notes if the petition gets 100,000 signees by Dec. 21, the White House has to respond within two months. Jenniffer Gonzalez, Puerto Rico's resident commissioner, is also taking action, sending a letter to Congress last week to request funds to make repairs. The NSF maintains the structure is beyond safe renovation. "We understand the risk of going there and trying to fix it," Wilbert Ruperto-Hernandez, one of the organizers of the "Save the Arecibo Observatory" campaign, tells Space.com. "But not many people think that it should be an excuse to just demolish it." https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/petition-emergency-action-evaluate-and-stabilize-arecibo-radio-telescope And just like that, now it's gone... "SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico?A huge, already damaged radio telescope in Puerto Rico that has played a key role in astronomical discoveries for more than half a century completely collapsed on Tuesday. The telescope's 900-ton receiver platform fell onto the reflector dish more than 400 feet below." https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/huge-loss-huge-puerto-rico-radio-telescope-arecibo-collapses-following-n1249515 I reckon that solves that problem. Glad no one was hurt. -- Freedom Isn't Free! With the lack of maintenance, I hope whomever was in charge does not get another management position. === I agree but it's possible there was a funding issue. NSF facilities are constantly struggling for budget dollars. There are newer radio telescopes that have come online since Arecibo was built and they might have had a higher funding priority. There are more capable receivers but Arecibo could also transmit. I agree the best chance will be if some rich people decide to take over the project. If they rebuild this with current technology they would really have something cool. Soros and the Hollywood elite should fund it. That way they'd be doing something worthwhile with their money instead of funding the liberal idiot politicians that they do. |
#24
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Signatures needed on petition to evaluate and stabilize the Arecibo radio telescope
|
#25
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Signatures needed on petition to evaluate and stabilize the Arecibo radio telescope
Wayne B wrote:
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 20:09:30 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: John wrote: On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 07:05:41 -0800 (PST), " wrote: On Friday, November 27, 2020 at 2:59:18 PM UTC-5, Wayne B wrote: Signatures needed on petition to evaluate and stabilize the Arecibo radio telescope: "We urge emergency action to have the Army Corps of Engineers or another agency evaluate the telescope structure and search for a safe way to stabilize it," reads the petition to the White House, which had more than 28,000 signatures as of Friday. Space.com notes if the petition gets 100,000 signees by Dec. 21, the White House has to respond within two months. Jenniffer Gonzalez, Puerto Rico's resident commissioner, is also taking action, sending a letter to Congress last week to request funds to make repairs. The NSF maintains the structure is beyond safe renovation. "We understand the risk of going there and trying to fix it," Wilbert Ruperto-Hernandez, one of the organizers of the "Save the Arecibo Observatory" campaign, tells Space.com. "But not many people think that it should be an excuse to just demolish it." https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/petition-emergency-action-evaluate-and-stabilize-arecibo-radio-telescope And just like that, now it's gone... "SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico?A huge, already damaged radio telescope in Puerto Rico that has played a key role in astronomical discoveries for more than half a century completely collapsed on Tuesday. The telescope's 900-ton receiver platform fell onto the reflector dish more than 400 feet below." https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/huge-loss-huge-puerto-rico-radio-telescope-arecibo-collapses-following-n1249515 I reckon that solves that problem. Glad no one was hurt. -- Freedom Isn't Free! With the lack of maintenance, I hope whomever was in charge does not get another management position. === I agree but it's possible there was a funding issue. NSF facilities are constantly struggling for budget dollars. There are newer radio telescopes that have come online since Arecibo was built and they might have had a higher funding priority. Still, cable maintenance should be close to numero uno. |
#26
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Signatures needed on petition to evaluate and stabilize the Arecibo radio telescope
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 21:32:55 -0500, B wrote:
In article , says... I agree but it's possible there was a funding issue. NSF facilities are constantly struggling for budget dollars. There are newer radio telescopes that have come online since Arecibo was built and they might have had a higher funding priority. There are more capable receivers but Arecibo could also transmit. I agree the best chance will be if some rich people decide to take over the project. If they rebuild this with current technology they would really have something cool. Soros and the Hollywood elite should fund it. That way they'd be doing something worthwhile with their money instead of funding the liberal idiot politicians that they do. Soros and the leftist elites won't get involved because there is no destroying capitalism and buying of votes in it. I don't see any of those guys coming up with the money. Someone like Musk or Gates might tho. You might even get Buffett interested. |
#27
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Signatures needed on petition to evaluate and stabilize theArecibo radio telescope
On 12/1/20 11:41 PM, Bill wrote:
Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 20:09:30 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: John wrote: On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 07:05:41 -0800 (PST), " wrote: On Friday, November 27, 2020 at 2:59:18 PM UTC-5, Wayne B wrote: Signatures needed on petition to evaluate and stabilize the Arecibo radio telescope: "We urge emergency action to have the Army Corps of Engineers or another agency evaluate the telescope structure and search for a safe way to stabilize it," reads the petition to the White House, which had more than 28,000 signatures as of Friday. Space.com notes if the petition gets 100,000 signees by Dec. 21, the White House has to respond within two months. Jenniffer Gonzalez, Puerto Rico's resident commissioner, is also taking action, sending a letter to Congress last week to request funds to make repairs. The NSF maintains the structure is beyond safe renovation. "We understand the risk of going there and trying to fix it," Wilbert Ruperto-Hernandez, one of the organizers of the "Save the Arecibo Observatory" campaign, tells Space.com. "But not many people think that it should be an excuse to just demolish it." https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/petition-emergency-action-evaluate-and-stabilize-arecibo-radio-telescope And just like that, now it's gone... "SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico?A huge, already damaged radio telescope in Puerto Rico that has played a key role in astronomical discoveries for more than half a century completely collapsed on Tuesday. The telescope's 900-ton receiver platform fell onto the reflector dish more than 400 feet below." https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/huge-loss-huge-puerto-rico-radio-telescope-arecibo-collapses-following-n1249515 I reckon that solves that problem. Glad no one was hurt. -- Freedom Isn't Free! With the lack of maintenance, I hope whomever was in charge does not get another management position. === I agree but it's possible there was a funding issue. NSF facilities are constantly struggling for budget dollars. There are newer radio telescopes that have come online since Arecibo was built and they might have had a higher funding priority. Still, cable maintenance should be close to numero uno. I wonder what the cost of a replacement telescope we need for the advancement of science is in comparison to another aircraft carrier we don't need. I read somewhere that the aircraft carrier named after Gerry Ford cost about $13 billion. -- Bozo Bin resuscitated...John Herring in there, along with Bert Robbins, 452471atgmail.com, Just-AN-Asshole, Evangelical Tim, and Gunboy Alex. Oh, if you are in the Bozo Bin, it is because you are only here to insult or your posts lack wit or you are deadly dull, or a combination. In Just-AN-Asshole's case, it is all three. |
#28
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Signatures needed on petition to evaluate and stabilize the Arecibo radio telescope
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 04:41:19 -0000 (UTC), Bill
wrote: Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 20:09:30 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: John wrote: On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 07:05:41 -0800 (PST), " wrote: On Friday, November 27, 2020 at 2:59:18 PM UTC-5, Wayne B wrote: Signatures needed on petition to evaluate and stabilize the Arecibo radio telescope: "We urge emergency action to have the Army Corps of Engineers or another agency evaluate the telescope structure and search for a safe way to stabilize it," reads the petition to the White House, which had more than 28,000 signatures as of Friday. Space.com notes if the petition gets 100,000 signees by Dec. 21, the White House has to respond within two months. Jenniffer Gonzalez, Puerto Rico's resident commissioner, is also taking action, sending a letter to Congress last week to request funds to make repairs. The NSF maintains the structure is beyond safe renovation. "We understand the risk of going there and trying to fix it," Wilbert Ruperto-Hernandez, one of the organizers of the "Save the Arecibo Observatory" campaign, tells Space.com. "But not many people think that it should be an excuse to just demolish it." https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/petition-emergency-action-evaluate-and-stabilize-arecibo-radio-telescope And just like that, now it's gone... "SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico?A huge, already damaged radio telescope in Puerto Rico that has played a key role in astronomical discoveries for more than half a century completely collapsed on Tuesday. The telescope's 900-ton receiver platform fell onto the reflector dish more than 400 feet below." https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/huge-loss-huge-puerto-rico-radio-telescope-arecibo-collapses-following-n1249515 I reckon that solves that problem. Glad no one was hurt. -- Freedom Isn't Free! With the lack of maintenance, I hope whomever was in charge does not get another management position. === I agree but it's possible there was a funding issue. NSF facilities are constantly struggling for budget dollars. There are newer radio telescopes that have come online since Arecibo was built and they might have had a higher funding priority. Still, cable maintenance should be close to numero uno. In a tropical island, steel has a life span and all the maintenance in the world is not going to change that much. The way I understand it this cable rusted from the inside out. |
#29
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Signatures needed on petition to evaluate and stabilizethe Arecibo radio telescope
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/1/20 11:41 PM, Bill wrote: Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 20:09:30 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: John wrote: On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 07:05:41 -0800 (PST), " wrote: On Friday, November 27, 2020 at 2:59:18 PM UTC-5, Wayne B wrote: Signatures needed on petition to evaluate and stabilize the Arecibo radio telescope: "We urge emergency action to have the Army Corps of Engineers or another agency evaluate the telescope structure and search for a safe way to stabilize it," reads the petition to the White House, which had more than 28,000 signatures as of Friday. Space.com notes if the petition gets 100,000 signees by Dec. 21, the White House has to respond within two months. Jenniffer Gonzalez, Puerto Rico's resident commissioner, is also taking action, sending a letter to Congress last week to request funds to make repairs. The NSF maintains the structure is beyond safe renovation. "We understand the risk of going there and trying to fix it," Wilbert Ruperto-Hernandez, one of the organizers of the "Save the Arecibo Observatory" campaign, tells Space.com. "But not many people think that it should be an excuse to just demolish it." https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/petition-emergency-action-evaluate-and-stabilize-arecibo-radio-telescope And just like that, now it's gone... "SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico?A huge, already damaged radio telescope in Puerto Rico that has played a key role in astronomical discoveries for more than half a century completely collapsed on Tuesday. The telescope's 900-ton receiver platform fell onto the reflector dish more than 400 feet below." https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/huge-loss-huge-puerto-rico-radio-telescope-arecibo-collapses-following-n1249515 I reckon that solves that problem. Glad no one was hurt. -- Freedom Isn't Free! With the lack of maintenance, I hope whomever was in charge does not get another management position. === I agree but it's possible there was a funding issue. NSF facilities are constantly struggling for budget dollars. There are newer radio telescopes that have come online since Arecibo was built and they might have had a higher funding priority. Still, cable maintenance should be close to numero uno. I wonder what the cost of a replacement telescope we need for the advancement of science is in comparison to another aircraft carrier we don't need. I read somewhere that the aircraft carrier named after Gerry Ford cost about $13 billion. Apples and oranges. |
#30
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Signatures needed on petition to evaluate and stabilizethe Arecibo radio telescope
wrote:
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 04:41:19 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 20:09:30 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: John wrote: On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 07:05:41 -0800 (PST), " wrote: On Friday, November 27, 2020 at 2:59:18 PM UTC-5, Wayne B wrote: Signatures needed on petition to evaluate and stabilize the Arecibo radio telescope: "We urge emergency action to have the Army Corps of Engineers or another agency evaluate the telescope structure and search for a safe way to stabilize it," reads the petition to the White House, which had more than 28,000 signatures as of Friday. Space.com notes if the petition gets 100,000 signees by Dec. 21, the White House has to respond within two months. Jenniffer Gonzalez, Puerto Rico's resident commissioner, is also taking action, sending a letter to Congress last week to request funds to make repairs. The NSF maintains the structure is beyond safe renovation. "We understand the risk of going there and trying to fix it," Wilbert Ruperto-Hernandez, one of the organizers of the "Save the Arecibo Observatory" campaign, tells Space.com. "But not many people think that it should be an excuse to just demolish it." https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/petition-emergency-action-evaluate-and-stabilize-arecibo-radio-telescope And just like that, now it's gone... "SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico?A huge, already damaged radio telescope in Puerto Rico that has played a key role in astronomical discoveries for more than half a century completely collapsed on Tuesday. The telescope's 900-ton receiver platform fell onto the reflector dish more than 400 feet below." https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/huge-loss-huge-puerto-rico-radio-telescope-arecibo-collapses-following-n1249515 I reckon that solves that problem. Glad no one was hurt. -- Freedom Isn't Free! With the lack of maintenance, I hope whomever was in charge does not get another management position. === I agree but it's possible there was a funding issue. NSF facilities are constantly struggling for budget dollars. There are newer radio telescopes that have come online since Arecibo was built and they might have had a higher funding priority. Still, cable maintenance should be close to numero uno. In a tropical island, steel has a life span and all the maintenance in the world is not going to change that much. The way I understand it this cable rusted from the inside out. Maintenance is also replacing the cables when they wear. Rust is wear. Can you imagine a ski resort maintenance supervisor blowing off broken wires in a chairlift cable? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Evaluate Our Vivacious Ladies in Amsterdam | General | |||
SEA 112 radio advice / manual / schematic needed | Electronics | |||
Means to Stabilize Kayak When Boarding Larger Boat? | General | |||
Heh Bob... My Telescope is.. | ASA | |||
Volunteers Needed To Locate Radio Pirate, Tampa Bay Area | General |