https://ibb.co/p277Xr9
--
Bozo Binned: Herring, Bert Robbins, JackGoff 452471atgmail.com,
Just-AN-Asshole, Tim, AMDX, and Gunboy Alex, aka the Gang of Dull,
Witless, Insult-Tossing Trumpsters. If you are on this list, I don't see
most of your posts and I don't read any of them.

Keyser Söze Wrote in message:r
https://ibb.co/p277Xr9-- Bozo Binned: Herring, Bert Robbins, JackGoff 452471atgmail.com,Just-AN-Asshole, Tim, AMDX, and Gunboy Alex, aka the Gang of Dull,Witless, Insult-Tossing Trumpsters. If you are on this list, I don't seemost of your posts and I don't read any of them.

I wasn't but thanks for warning us that your CPAP saw you thru the
night. Damn!
--


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html

On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 11:33:36 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

https://ibb.co/p277Xr9

Chuck certainly isn't helping his case when he cites Belknap, a 140
year old impeachment of a corrupt war department head in the Grant
administration.
Maybe if he knew how to read he would know Belknap was acquitted in
the senate and the reason the 40 some senators who voted not to
convict was they thought it was unconstitutional.
Now he is looking at 45 who think the same thing about this Trump
witch hunt. They don't have near enough of a case to convict anyway.
This mess is just going to embolden Trump more. Is that really what
your plan was Chuck?

Maybe this rebuke will stop the impeachment fever. You realize we had
ONE impeachment of a president in the first 200 years we were a
country and 3 in the last 25 years. None succeeded and they were all
political stunts.
Most people don't even know why Andrew Johnson was impeached in the
first place even if they did have the Trivial Pursuit factoid that he
was the only one before Clinton. Most probably assumed he was kicked
out of the White House too.
The fact is, he was right and Congress was wrong.
He violated a newly passed, unconstitutional law.
(Fired Stanton)
From Wikipedia.
"While evaluating the constitutionality of a similar law in Myers v.
United States (1926), the Supreme Court stated that the Tenure of
Office Act was likely invalid".

Wrote in message:r
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 11:33:36 -0500, Keyser wrote:https://ibb.co/p277Xr9Chuck certainly isn't helping his case when he cites Belknap, a 140year old impeachment of a corrupt war department head in the Grantadministration. Maybe if he knew how to read he would know Belknap was acquitted inthe senate and the reason the 40 some senators who voted not toconvict was they thought it was unconstitutional. Now he is looking at 45 who think the same thing about this Trumpwitch hunt. They don't have near enough of a case to convict anyway. This mess is just going to embolden Trump more. Is that really whatyour plan was Chuck? Maybe this rebuke will stop the impeachment fever. You realize we hadONE impeachment of a president in the first 200 years we were acountry and 3 in the last 25 years. None succeeded and they were allpolitical stunts. Most people don't even know why Andrew Johnson was impeached in thefirst place even if they did have the Trivial Pursuit factoid that hewas the only one before Clinton. Most probably assumed he was kickedout of the White House too. The fact is, he was right and Congress was wrong. He violated a newly passed, unconstitutional law. (Fired Stanton)From Wikipedia. "While evaluating the constitutionality of a similar law in Myers v.United States (1926), the Supreme Court stated that the Tenure ofOffice Act was likely invalid".

Does the way Chuckles wears his glasses on the tip of his ample
probiscus make him appear to be smart.
--


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html

On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 08:45:31 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:

Wrote in message:r
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 11:33:36 -0500, Keyser wrote:https://ibb.co/p277Xr9Chuck certainly isn't helping his case when he cites Belknap, a 140year old impeachment of a corrupt war department head in the Grantadministration. Maybe if he knew how to read he would know Belknap was acquitted inthe
senate and the reason the 40 some senators who voted not toconvict was they thought it was unconstitutional. Now he is looking at 45 who think the same thing about this Trumpwitch hunt. They don't have near enough of a case to convict anyway. This mess is just going to embolden Trump more. Is that really whatyour plan was Chuck?
Maybe this rebuke will stop the impeachment fever. You realize we hadONE impeachment of a president in the first 200 years we were acountry and 3 in the last 25 years. None succeeded and they were allpolitical stunts. Most people don't even know why Andrew Johnson was impeached in thefirst place even if they did have the Trivial
Pursuit
factoid that hewas the only one before Clinton. Most probably assumed he was kickedout of the White House too. The fact is, he was right and Congress was wrong. He violated a newly passed, unconstitutional law. (Fired Stanton)From Wikipedia. "While evaluating the constitutionality of a similar law in Myers v.United States (1926),
the Supreme Court stated that the Tenure ofOffice Act was likely invalid".

Does the way Chuckles wears his glasses on the tip of his ample
probiscus make him appear to be smart.

Not smart enough to get bifocals.