Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 19 May 2021 17:22:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill
wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 5/18/21 4:43 PM, True North wrote: Not sure if anyone has much interest in boats or ships anymore but we have a special visitor in Halifax. Supposed to be the biggest container ship to ever visit the east coast of North America and the Port of Halifax is first to host it https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-...ship-1.6030678 Wowser! Wonder how many gallons per mile it burns? ![]() I think the QE2 got something like 12 inches per gallon. Spoofer alert! -- Thanks Donald. Do you miss him yet? ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 18 May 2021 20:53:32 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message:r Not sure if anyone has much interest in boats or ships anymore but we have a special visitor in Halifax.Supposed to be the biggest container ship to ever visit the east coast of North America and the Port of Halifax is first to host ithttps://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/marco-polo-halifax-breaks-record-biggest-cargo-ship-1.6030678 That's a tiny bit longer than the old deisel powered carrier that I served on. Much larger war and other ships exist today. Spoofer alert! -- Thanks Donald. Do you miss him yet? ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 5/18/21 4:43 PM, True North wrote: Not sure if anyone has much interest in boats or ships anymore but we have a special visitor in Halifax. Supposed to be the biggest container ship to ever visit the east coast of North America and the Port of Halifax is first to host it https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-...ship-1.6030678 Wowser! Wonder how many gallons per mile it burns? ![]() I think the QE2 got something like 12 inches per gallon. I did a little research and they say between 49’ and a 125’ per gallon. Don’t know,if that is Imperial gallon. |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 19 May 2021 19:58:29 -0000 (UTC), Bill
wrote: Bill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 5/18/21 4:43 PM, True North wrote: Not sure if anyone has much interest in boats or ships anymore but we have a special visitor in Halifax. Supposed to be the biggest container ship to ever visit the east coast of North America and the Port of Halifax is first to host it https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-...ship-1.6030678 Wowser! Wonder how many gallons per mile it burns? ![]() I think the QE2 got something like 12 inches per gallon. I did a little research and they say between 49’ and a 125’ per gallon. Don’t know,if that is Imperial gallon. Spoofer troll roomba alert! -- Thanks Donald. Do you miss him yet? ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 19 May 2021 19:58:29 -0000 (UTC), Bill
wrote: Bill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 5/18/21 4:43 PM, True North wrote: Not sure if anyone has much interest in boats or ships anymore but we have a special visitor in Halifax. Supposed to be the biggest container ship to ever visit the east coast of North America and the Port of Halifax is first to host it https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-...ship-1.6030678 Wowser! Wonder how many gallons per mile it burns? ![]() I think the QE2 got something like 12 inches per gallon. I did a little research and they say between 49’ and a 125’ per gallon. Don’t know,if that is Imperial gallon. They were also doing a lot more than just pushing a ship through the water and it was faster. This was a city floating out there. They used a hell of a lot of energy sitting at anchor. |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:r
On 5/19/21 11:36 PM, wrote: On Wed, 19 May 2021 19:58:29 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: Bill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 5/18/21 4:43 PM, True North wrote: Not sure if anyone has much interest in boats or ships anymore but we have a special visitor in Halifax. Supposed to be the biggest container ship to ever visit the east coast of North America and the Port of Halifax is first to host it https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/marco-polo-halifax-breaks-record-biggest-cargo-ship-1.6030678 Wowser! Wonder how many gallons per mile it burns? ![]() Thats exactly what we expect you to say. You wish misery and grief on others because you are a miserable old coot down on your luck. Have a crappy day. -- Thanks Donald. Do you miss him yet? ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, May 18, 2021 at 7:15:02 PM UTC-4, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 May 2021 at 19:53:53 UTC-3, Keyser Söze wrote: On 5/18/21 4:43 PM, True North wrote: Not sure if anyone has much interest in boats or ships anymore but we have a special visitor in Halifax. Supposed to be the biggest container ship to ever visit the east coast of North America and the Port of Halifax is first to host it https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-...ship-1.6030678 Wowser! Wonder how many gallons per mile it burns? ![]() -- * Lock up Trump and his family of grifters. * I can only imagine! I went to the ports arrivals and departures where it lists the Marco Polo at 174,000 G?T. Not sure if that means fully loaded or dry. That's almost equal to two Nimitz class aircraft carriers. One site compared it to the French aircraft carrier, Charles d'Gaulle. The French warship looked puny in the comparison graphic.. === It has a single diesel engine rated at 107,390 hp. Top speed for the Marco Polo is 25 kts but probably operated a bit slower at around 20 kts. At that speed it would burn about 4,000 gallons per hour or 200 gallons per nautical mile. At 6076 feet per nm, it would burn a little over 30 gallons per foot. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CMA_CGM_Marco_Polo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W%C3%A...Sulzer_RTA96-C |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 12:05:29 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Tuesday, May 18, 2021 at 7:15:02 PM UTC-4, True North wrote: On Tuesday, 18 May 2021 at 19:53:53 UTC-3, Keyser Söze wrote: On 5/18/21 4:43 PM, True North wrote: Not sure if anyone has much interest in boats or ships anymore but we have a special visitor in Halifax. Supposed to be the biggest container ship to ever visit the east coast of North America and the Port of Halifax is first to host it https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-...ship-1.6030678 Wowser! Wonder how many gallons per mile it burns? ![]() -- * Lock up Trump and his family of grifters. * I can only imagine! I went to the ports arrivals and departures where it lists the Marco Polo at 174,000 G?T. Not sure if that means fully loaded or dry. That's almost equal to two Nimitz class aircraft carriers. One site compared it to the French aircraft carrier, Charles d'Gaulle. The French warship looked puny in the comparison graphic.. === It has a single diesel engine rated at 107,390 hp. Top speed for the Marco Polo is 25 kts but probably operated a bit slower at around 20 kts. At that speed it would burn about 4,000 gallons per hour or 200 gallons per nautical mile. At 6076 feet per nm, it would burn a little over 30 gallons per foot. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CMA_CGM_Marco_Polo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W%C3%A...Sulzer_RTA96-C Correction: Make that 30 feet per gallon, not 30 gallons per foot. |
#20
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/20/21 12:12 PM, wrote:
On Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 12:05:29 PM UTC-4, wrote: On Tuesday, May 18, 2021 at 7:15:02 PM UTC-4, True North wrote: On Tuesday, 18 May 2021 at 19:53:53 UTC-3, Keyser Söze wrote: On 5/18/21 4:43 PM, True North wrote: Not sure if anyone has much interest in boats or ships anymore but we have a special visitor in Halifax. Supposed to be the biggest container ship to ever visit the east coast of North America and the Port of Halifax is first to host it https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-...ship-1.6030678 Wowser! Wonder how many gallons per mile it burns? ![]() -- * Lock up Trump and his family of grifters. * I can only imagine! I went to the ports arrivals and departures where it lists the Marco Polo at 174,000 G?T. Not sure if that means fully loaded or dry. That's almost equal to two Nimitz class aircraft carriers. One site compared it to the French aircraft carrier, Charles d'Gaulle. The French warship looked puny in the comparison graphic.. === It has a single diesel engine rated at 107,390 hp. Top speed for the Marco Polo is 25 kts but probably operated a bit slower at around 20 kts. At that speed it would burn about 4,000 gallons per hour or 200 gallons per nautical mile. At 6076 feet per nm, it would burn a little over 30 gallons per foot. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CMA_CGM_Marco_Polo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W%C3%A...Sulzer_RTA96-C Correction: Make that 30 feet per gallon, not 30 gallons per foot. Good grief...even with high speed fuel pumps, it must take a long time to refuel that monster. -- * Lock up Trump and his family of grifters. * |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cruise ship sinks Venezuelan Navy ship after being fired at and rammed | General | |||
Empire Sandy Tall Ship in Welland Canal 13June2010 - Empire Sandy Tall Ship approaching Lock2 13June2010 #6856 e.jpg | Tall Ship Photos | |||
Warping In--British Ship Ardramurchan at Port Blakely, Washington, 1903_Chistopher Blossom_sqs Warping In__British Ship Ardramurchan at Port Blakely, Washington, 1903_Christopher Blossom, 2000_sqs.jpg [1/2] | Tall Ship Photos | |||
Warping In--British Ship Ardramurchan at Port Blakely, Washington, 1903_Chistopher Blossom_sqs Warping In__British Ship Ardramurchan at Port Blakely, Washington, 1903_Christopher Blossom, 2000_sqs.jpg [1/2] | Tall Ship Photos | |||
not a tall ship.. but does anyone recognise this 1940s ship? (link in message) | Tall Ship Photos |