Gould,
Do you disagree that the party you support wants the draft reinstated?

I don't support any political party.
My choice for POTUS this year will be a Democrat. I am seriously debating
between the Demo and the Repub candidate in the Wash State Gov. election- she's
more liberal and more tuned in to some of my concerns, but he might be a better
administrator. Unlike the POTUS race, the Republican candidate hasn't already
proven to be inept.

I vote for the man, not the party. Next time you right wingers run a qualified
candidate, I will carefully compare with other choices and perhaps support him
or her for the office.

But you do agree that it when you were upset about Bush trying to reinstall
the draft you were mistaken, it was really the democrats, and one of them is
from your state.


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Gould,
Do you disagree that the party you support wants the draft reinstated?

I don't support any political party.
My choice for POTUS this year will be a Democrat. I am seriously debating
between the Demo and the Repub candidate in the Wash State Gov. election-
she's
more liberal and more tuned in to some of my concerns, but he might be a
better
administrator. Unlike the POTUS race, the Republican candidate hasn't
already
proven to be inept.

I vote for the man, not the party. Next time you right wingers run a
qualified
candidate, I will carefully compare with other choices and perhaps support
him
or her for the office.

But you do agree that it when you were upset about Bush trying to reinstall
the draft you were mistaken, it was really the democrats, and one of them is
from your state.




See previous post. The draft has always been there. Got any grown sons?
Remember their 18th birthday? The bill would merely require that your daughters
register too, and that most non-medical exemptions would be eliminated.

Why not do an experiment? Check out the
selective service dot org web site. The first page you see will have a big
disclaimer "Relax! No draft has been ordered!". But keep going. Go to the
strategic goals for 2004. Happy reading.

If you want to place blame for the Selective Service and their objectives of
being prepared in case the US needs to reinstate the draft, you need to go
back to Jimmy Carter. "The registration requirement was suspended in April
1975. It was resumed again in 1980 by President Carter in response to the
Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Registration continues today as a hedge
against underestimating the number of servicemen needed in a future crisis.
" http://www.sss.gov/backgr.htm






"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
But you do agree that it when you were upset about Bush trying to
reinstall
the draft you were mistaken, it was really the democrats, and one of them
is
from your state.




See previous post. The draft has always been there. Got any grown sons?
Remember their 18th birthday? The bill would merely require that your
daughters
register too, and that most non-medical exemptions would be eliminated.

Why not do an experiment? Check out the
selective service dot org web site. The first page you see will have a big
disclaimer "Relax! No draft has been ordered!". But keep going. Go to the
strategic goals for 2004. Happy reading.

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
It's not my role to defend the site. Check it out and draw your own
conclusion,
but don't blindly accept Bush Limbaugh's spin on the matter.

Why do you think I listen to Rush or any talk radio? I don't and haven't
listen to Rush in over 5 years. When I did I listened to it to hear his
outrageous statements and his twisted logic.

I guess if someone disagrees with you, they must listen to Rush.

Gould,
I could not find a copy of the Annual Performance Plan for any year except
2004. Can you provide me a link to review the Annual Performance Plan for
1998 - 2003?

Can you also reference a few of the changes in the 2004 Annual Performance
Plan that is different than those from previous years?


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
This has not changed since 1980,

The strategic goals change each year.
Check the site, they list the strategic goals for several prior years.

It's not my role to defend the site. Check it out and draw your own
conclusion,
but don't blindly accept Bush Limbaugh's spin on the matter.

Taco Heaven wrote:
Why do you think I listen to Rush or any talk radio?

Because you talk the same line of **** almost word for word.

.... I don't and haven't
listen to Rush in over 5 years.

It's amazing how many of the fascist whackos who eagerly vent their
boneheaded rantings "don't listen to Rush" yet somehow manage to say
pretty much the same thing, often in the same words.

It's really an incredible coincidence, nyet?


... When I did I listened to it to hear his
outrageous statements and his twisted logic.

Actually, due to conditions in my workplace, I listen to him more often
than I'd wish... and occasionally enjoy the show... he can be very funny.

DSK

Gould,
I could not find a copy of the Annual Performance Plan for any year except
2004. Can you provide me a link to review the Annual Performance Plan for
1998 - 2003?

http://www.sss.gov/perfplan_fy2004.html

Read it carefully. Each category has subcategories reviewing any similar goals
from 1999-2003.

On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:17:01 +0000, Taco Heaven wrote:

Gould,
I could not find a copy of the Annual Performance Plan for any year except
2004. Can you provide me a link to review the Annual Performance Plan for
1998 - 2003?

Uh, I wouldn't be surprised. *Plans* are like that;-). The information
you are looking for, I would suspect to be in the Annual Reports to
Congress.

http://www.sss.gov/public.htm

DSK,

What can I say to you comment. You must know what I listen to better than I
do.

When I listened to him (over 5 yrs ago) I did find him amusing at times, but
I got very tired of hearing the same ole bull **** over and over again. He
is a grand self promoter who does not allow facts to get in the way of his
BS.

"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
Taco Heaven wrote:
Why do you think I listen to Rush or any talk radio?

Because you talk the same line of **** almost word for word.

.... I don't and haven't listen to Rush in over 5 years.

It's amazing how many of the fascist whackos who eagerly vent their
boneheaded rantings "don't listen to Rush" yet somehow manage to say
pretty much the same thing, often in the same words.

It's really an incredible coincidence, nyet?


... When I did I listened to it to hear his outrageous statements and
his twisted logic.

Actually, due to conditions in my workplace, I listen to him more often
than I'd wish... and occasionally enjoy the show... he can be very funny.

DSK