Gould,
You are losing it, of course you can point out it is full of ****, but to
then try to say that this is representative of the "educated Republicans" is
grasping at straws.


Not so fast, Taco Flipper. *You* were the one making the case that Republicans
didn't pander to the very people who would respond to something like this. I
believe *you* said it was because the Republicans are better educated.

I did say Republicans were better educated, and I said better educated
people are more informed than non educated people. The only person who
responded to his ridiculous post was you.

I would never say ALL Republicans in reference to any subject, just as I
would never say anything about ALL liberals. Possibly if you were better
educated you would understand sets and subsets and would not have
misunderstood such an easy concept.

By the way, who started this crazy letter, and what party were they likely
to vote for?




"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Gould,
You are losing it, of course you can point out it is full of ****, but to
then try to say that this is representative of the "educated Republicans"
is
grasping at straws.


Not so fast, Taco Flipper. *You* were the one making the case that
Republicans
didn't pander to the very people who would respond to something like this.
I
believe *you* said it was because the Republicans are better educated.

" jim--" wrote in message ...
Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

Why would you say that? What evidence do YOU have that NAMBLA supports Kerry?

There is no evidence that NAMBLA supports anyone. The post was a troll
nothing more, nothing less.

There also is no evidence that the letter written concerning NAMBLA and
Kerry was written by someone who supports either party, he could have been
completely apolitical. It is possible that he supported Kerry and wanted to
make a post showing how terrible the Republicans are. It is possible that
NAMBLA did support Kerry. Who knows, and it does not matter. Kerry would
never endorse any of NAMBLA principles. It also has not been shown that the
person who made the post supported either party. When a post is crossposted
to so many unrelated groups, it is a troll. He succeeded it having Chuck
bite it hook, line and sinker.

And you seem to be fighting Gould for the bait.


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

Why would you say that? What evidence do YOU have that NAMBLA supports
Kerry?

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

Why would you say that? What evidence do YOU have that NAMBLA supports
Kerry?

LOL! I could care less about NAMBLA and who it supports. In fact, until I
read about it on the internet just a minute ago I had no idea what NAMBLA
was.

Did I indicate otherwise?

" jim--" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

Why would you say that? What evidence do YOU have that NAMBLA supports
Kerry?

LOL! I could care less about NAMBLA and who it supports. In fact, until I
read about it on the internet just a minute ago I had no idea what NAMBLA
was.

Did I indicate otherwise?

Yes, very much so. You claimed that Chuck was "losing it", because he
stated that whoever said such crap is nothing short of a pure liar.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

Why would you say that? What evidence do YOU have that NAMBLA supports
Kerry?

LOL! I could care less about NAMBLA and who it supports. In fact, until
I
read about it on the internet just a minute ago I had no idea what NAMBLA
was.

Did I indicate otherwise?

Yes, very much so. You claimed that Chuck was "losing it", because he
stated that whoever said such crap is nothing short of a pure liar.

I really said that? Could you point out the post where I did?

" JimH" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

Why would you say that? What evidence do YOU have that NAMBLA supports
Kerry?

LOL! I could care less about NAMBLA and who it supports. In fact, until
I
read about it on the internet just a minute ago I had no idea what NAMBLA
was.

Did I indicate otherwise?

Yes, very much so. You claimed that Chuck was "losing it", because he
stated that whoever said such crap is nothing short of a pure liar.

I really said that? Could you point out the post where I did?

You dumb ****, I was replying to Jim--, and here is what he said:

Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" JimH" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he
once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

Why would you say that? What evidence do YOU have that NAMBLA
supports
Kerry?

LOL! I could care less about NAMBLA and who it supports. In fact,
until
I
read about it on the internet just a minute ago I had no idea what
NAMBLA
was.

Did I indicate otherwise?

Yes, very much so. You claimed that Chuck was "losing it", because he
stated that whoever said such crap is nothing short of a pure liar.

I really said that? Could you point out the post where I did?

You dumb ****, I was replying to Jim--, and here is what he said:

Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!

" JimH" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" JimH" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" jim--" wrote in message
...
Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he
once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

Why would you say that? What evidence do YOU have that NAMBLA
supports
Kerry?

LOL! I could care less about NAMBLA and who it supports. In fact,
until
I
read about it on the internet just a minute ago I had no idea what
NAMBLA
was.

Did I indicate otherwise?

Yes, very much so. You claimed that Chuck was "losing it", because he
stated that whoever said such crap is nothing short of a pure liar.

I really said that? Could you point out the post where I did?

You dumb ****, I was replying to Jim--, and here is what he said:

Chuckie is losing it. He won't make it to the election before he once
again
takes his bat and ball and runs home.

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!

My, my you ARE the stupid one, eh?