Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Harry Krause
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT--Looks like Harry was right about the hurricanes

NOYB wrote:
http://www.unf-unf.de/show.php?did=664

Personally, I think it's the Clinton's doing.


It's the wrath of Hillary!

Seriously, the few analytical reports I've seen seem to tie the increase
in storms to a side effect of global warming.

It would be very decent of you and some of your wealthy professional
friends to see what you can do to help some of the least fortunate in
your state who have lost everything and have no insurance. You have a
lot of very hard working migrant agricultural workers who do the jobs no
Americans will touch, and they have been really devastated by the
storms. Clothing, food, help with temporary shelter...help your brothers
out there, Nobby...it'll make you feel warm all over.



--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?
  #2   Report Post  
Karl Denninger
 
Posts: n/a
Default


In article ,
Harry Krause wrote:


NOYB wrote:
http://www.unf-unf.de/show.php?did=664

Personally, I think it's the Clinton's doing.


It's the wrath of Hillary!

Seriously, the few analytical reports I've seen seem to tie the increase
in storms to a side effect of global warming.


Bull****.

Two of the best-known and most-well-respected hurricane analysts (Gray being
one, *******i being another) have said that is complete bull****.

Specifically, "global warming", were it real, would tend to DIMINISH
hurricane activity since it would lessen the gradients that drive these
storms.

Second, there is a roughly 30 year cycle in hurricane activity, with 60
years for a complete "cycle".

We have been in a 30 year LOW. Now we're entering a 30 year HIGH. The last
"high" cycle ended roughly in 1970.

If you actually LOOK at the data, instead of simply trying to fit what's
happening to something you WANT to see, this becomes rather obvious.

Indeed, it requires no "hard science" - just a look at the numbers. The 40s
to 70s had more hurricanes, the 70s to 00s had less, the 10s to 40s had
more, etc.

What this means is that we're due for 30 years of this chit - and it has
nothing to do with "global anything"; its a normal cyclical weather pattern.

--
--
Karl Denninger ) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist
http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do!
http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING!
http://www.spamcuda.net SPAM FREE mailboxes - FREE FOR A LIMITED TIME!
http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind
  #3   Report Post  
Harry Krause
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Karl Denninger wrote:
In article ,
Harry Krause wrote:


NOYB wrote:
http://www.unf-unf.de/show.php?did=664

Personally, I think it's the Clinton's doing.


It's the wrath of Hillary!

Seriously, the few analytical reports I've seen seem to tie the increase
in storms to a side effect of global warming.


Bull****.

Two of the best-known and most-well-respected hurricane analysts (Gray being
one, *******i being another) have said that is complete bull****.


Well, that doesn't make it so.




--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?
  #4   Report Post  
P.Fritz
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Karl Denninger" wrote in message
ink.net...

In article ,
Harry Krause wrote:


NOYB wrote:
http://www.unf-unf.de/show.php?did=664

Personally, I think it's the Clinton's doing.


It's the wrath of Hillary!

Seriously, the few analytical reports I've seen seem to tie the increase
in storms to a side effect of global warming.


Bull****.

Two of the best-known and most-well-respected hurricane analysts (Gray

being
one, *******i being another) have said that is complete bull****.

Specifically, "global warming", were it real, would tend to DIMINISH
hurricane activity since it would lessen the gradients that drive these
storms.

Second, there is a roughly 30 year cycle in hurricane activity, with 60
years for a complete "cycle".

We have been in a 30 year LOW. Now we're entering a 30 year HIGH. The

last
"high" cycle ended roughly in 1970.

If you actually LOOK at the data, instead of simply trying to fit what's
happening to something you WANT to see, this becomes rather obvious.

Indeed, it requires no "hard science" - just a look at the numbers. The

40s
to 70s had more hurricanes, the 70s to 00s had less, the 10s to 40s had
more, etc.

What this means is that we're due for 30 years of this chit - and it has
nothing to do with "global anything"; its a normal cyclical weather

pattern.

Just like the water levels in the great lakes......there is a cycle from low
to high....as the water fell, it was blamed on global warming, now that it
is rising once again, no doubt, that too will be blamed on global warming.

Because global warming is based on such bad science, anything and everything
can be pinned on it.....all with no proof.



--
--
Karl Denninger ) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights

Activist
http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do!
http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING!
http://www.spamcuda.net SPAM FREE mailboxes - FREE FOR A LIMITED TIME!
http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind



  #5   Report Post  
NOYB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
http://www.unf-unf.de/show.php?did=664

Personally, I think it's the Clinton's doing.


It's the wrath of Hillary!

Seriously, the few analytical reports I've seen seem to tie the increase
in storms to a side effect of global warming.

It would be very decent of you and some of your wealthy professional
friends to see what you can do to help some of the least fortunate in
your state who have lost everything and have no insurance. You have a
lot of very hard working migrant agricultural workers who do the jobs no
Americans will touch, and they have been really devastated by the
storms. Clothing, food, help with temporary shelter...help your brothers
out there, Nobby...it'll make you feel warm all over.


I have.

BTW--You do realize that there's no law against sending checks across state
lines to the Red Cross in areas that were effected by the hurricanes? When
you write *your* check, please write "earmarked for hurricane ____ recovery
efforts in _______ county" so the money gets used for what it was meant for.
That's what I did.






  #6   Report Post  
NOYB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...

"Karl Denninger" wrote in message
ink.net...

In article ,
Harry Krause wrote:


NOYB wrote:
http://www.unf-unf.de/show.php?did=664

Personally, I think it's the Clinton's doing.


It's the wrath of Hillary!

Seriously, the few analytical reports I've seen seem to tie the

increase
in storms to a side effect of global warming.


Bull****.

Two of the best-known and most-well-respected hurricane analysts (Gray

being
one, *******i being another) have said that is complete bull****.

Specifically, "global warming", were it real, would tend to DIMINISH
hurricane activity since it would lessen the gradients that drive these
storms.

Second, there is a roughly 30 year cycle in hurricane activity, with 60
years for a complete "cycle".

We have been in a 30 year LOW. Now we're entering a 30 year HIGH. The

last
"high" cycle ended roughly in 1970.

If you actually LOOK at the data, instead of simply trying to fit what's
happening to something you WANT to see, this becomes rather obvious.

Indeed, it requires no "hard science" - just a look at the numbers. The

40s
to 70s had more hurricanes, the 70s to 00s had less, the 10s to 40s had
more, etc.

What this means is that we're due for 30 years of this chit - and it has
nothing to do with "global anything"; its a normal cyclical weather

pattern.

Just like the water levels in the great lakes......there is a cycle from

low
to high....as the water fell, it was blamed on global warming, now that it
is rising once again, no doubt, that too will be blamed on global warming.

Because global warming is based on such bad science, anything and

everything
can be pinned on it.....all with no proof.


So you guys don't think that God is punishing the counties that voted for
Bush?

Good. Because if you look at that map again, you'll see a couple of
problems with it. Volusia, Orange, and Osceola counties all got nailed by
Frances and Jeanne...and all went squarely for Gore in 2000. Also, I'm
pretty sure that the Keys are part of Monroe County.


  #7   Report Post  
Harry Krause
 
Posts: n/a
Default

NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
http://www.unf-unf.de/show.php?did=664

Personally, I think it's the Clinton's doing.


It's the wrath of Hillary!

Seriously, the few analytical reports I've seen seem to tie the increase
in storms to a side effect of global warming.

It would be very decent of you and some of your wealthy professional
friends to see what you can do to help some of the least fortunate in
your state who have lost everything and have no insurance. You have a
lot of very hard working migrant agricultural workers who do the jobs no
Americans will touch, and they have been really devastated by the
storms. Clothing, food, help with temporary shelter...help your brothers
out there, Nobby...it'll make you feel warm all over.


I have.

BTW--You do realize that there's no law against sending checks across state
lines to the Red Cross in areas that were effected by the hurricanes? When
you write *your* check, please write "earmarked for hurricane ____ recovery
efforts in _______ county" so the money gets used for what it was meant for.
That's what I did.



We've already made a substantial contribution in this household, and we
are fundraising in our neighborhood to get more.



--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?
  #8   Report Post  
NOYB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
http://www.unf-unf.de/show.php?did=664

Personally, I think it's the Clinton's doing.


It's the wrath of Hillary!

Seriously, the few analytical reports I've seen seem to tie the

increase
in storms to a side effect of global warming.

It would be very decent of you and some of your wealthy professional
friends to see what you can do to help some of the least fortunate in
your state who have lost everything and have no insurance. You have a
lot of very hard working migrant agricultural workers who do the jobs

no
Americans will touch, and they have been really devastated by the
storms. Clothing, food, help with temporary shelter...help your

brothers
out there, Nobby...it'll make you feel warm all over.


I have.

BTW--You do realize that there's no law against sending checks across

state
lines to the Red Cross in areas that were effected by the hurricanes?

When
you write *your* check, please write "earmarked for hurricane ____

recovery
efforts in _______ county" so the money gets used for what it was meant

for.
That's what I did.



We've already made a substantial contribution in this household, and we
are fundraising in our neighborhood to get more.


Good. Just checking. ;-)


  #9   Report Post  
Short Wave Sportfishing
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:46:31 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
http://www.unf-unf.de/show.php?did=664

Personally, I think it's the Clinton's doing.


It's the wrath of Hillary!

Seriously, the few analytical reports I've seen seem to tie the increase
in storms to a side effect of global warming.

It would be very decent of you and some of your wealthy professional
friends to see what you can do to help some of the least fortunate in
your state who have lost everything and have no insurance. You have a
lot of very hard working migrant agricultural workers who do the jobs no
Americans will touch, and they have been really devastated by the
storms. Clothing, food, help with temporary shelter...help your brothers
out there, Nobby...it'll make you feel warm all over.


I have.

BTW--You do realize that there's no law against sending checks across state
lines to the Red Cross in areas that were effected by the hurricanes? When
you write *your* check, please write "earmarked for hurricane ____ recovery
efforts in _______ county" so the money gets used for what it was meant for.
That's what I did.


Do that anyway any time you send money to a relief agency. While I
won't have anything to do with the Red Cross, there are other national
agencies working down there and the two checks we've sent are directly
earmarked to relief efforts in that area.

Later,

Tom
-----------
"Angling may be said to be so
like the mathematics that it
can never be fully learnt..."

Izaak Walton "The Compleat Angler", 1653
  #10   Report Post  
thunder
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:45:46 -0400, P.Fritz wrote:


Because global warming is based on such bad science, anything and
everything can be pinned on it.....all with no proof.


Agreed, there isn't enough oil & gas left to cause global warming.

http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994216
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NOYB and Harry go Boating.... Gould 0738 General 1 August 14th 04 12:18 PM
Harry reveals his true colors! Jack Goff General 53 June 4th 04 04:07 PM
It depends on who you feed. CCred68046 General 78 April 29th 04 01:34 PM
Gotcha, Harry!!! Butch Ammon General 21 February 20th 04 06:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017