JohnH wrote in message . ..
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 21:28:17 +1100, K Smith wrote:


So far it's an unconfirm "Iranian" report,
but...................keeping our fingers crossed!!

Take care & well done.


K

Thanks, K!

Now I'm waiting to see how many congratulatory messages are posted by Harry,
jps, basskisser, et al. Should be interesting reading.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

Yeah, blah, blah, blah, the same conservative rhetoric, either you are
for us, or against us, if you don't bow to BushCo, you are a traitor,
if you think there are things in this country that need fixing, you
are a communist, right Rush, I mean, John?

JohnH wrote in message . ..
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 12:52:10 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

WaIIy wrote:

On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 08:06:08 -0500, JohnH
wrote:

On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 21:28:17 +1100, K Smith wrote:


So far it's an unconfirm "Iranian" report,
but...................keeping our fingers crossed!!

Take care & well done.


K

Thanks, K!

Now I'm waiting to see how many congratulatory messages are posted by Harry,
jps, basskisser, et al. Should be interesting reading.

They are so immersed in hatred for everything Bush and anything
patriotic, there will be no positive comments.

Dean in '04 LOL


There is no connection whatsoever between true patriotism and the Bush
Adminstration. Bush and his crew are nothing but right-wing whores.

The capture of Saddam is a good thing. The Bush administration is responsible.
Yippee. Can't wait to hear Dean. Gotta be fun to watch.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

Huh, the way I understand it, it was the 4th infantry, and that was
with information supplied by Iraqis.

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Yuh think? I'm thinking he'll be tried by Iraqis in Iraq. The Governing
Council is already calling for the trial. Justice may be quicker if left
to the Iraqis.

That would be an encouraging development. Let's wait and see.

Today's news says our gov't isn't sure the Iraqis are properly equipped to
handle a trial. Hopefully, this decision isn't in Bush's hands.

"NOYB" wrote in message
...


The guy chose to hide himself and his weapons among his civilian
population.

Which weapons are you referring to???

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...


The guy chose to hide himself and his weapons among his civilian
population.

Which weapons are you referring to???

French-made Roland surface-to-air missiles, bombs and grenades hidden in
mosques and under Iraqi homes, etc.

http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/pol/terror/01122107.htm
"According to the Times account, Saeed said that Iraq had begun using rooms
in or under villas in residential areas and in commercial areas during the
Persian Gulf War to protect weapons sites from American bombing, but that
they had now become a permanent feature of Iraq's weapons programs."

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...


The guy chose to hide himself and his weapons among his civilian
population.

Which weapons are you referring to???

French-made Roland surface-to-air missiles, bombs and grenades hidden in
mosques and under Iraqi homes, etc.

http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/pol/terror/01122107.htm
"According to the Times account, Saeed said that Iraq had begun using
rooms
in or under villas in residential areas and in commercial areas during the
Persian Gulf War to protect weapons sites from American bombing, but that
they had now become a permanent feature of Iraq's weapons programs."

Duh. If WE were invaded by a sophisticated army, where would YOU hide
weapons, Einstein? :-) In a big warehouse with the word "wEpinZ" spray
painted on all four sides?

Today's news says our gov't isn't sure the Iraqis are properly equipped to
handle a trial.

Duh. Why not? I mean, with no organized government and all........

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...


The guy chose to hide himself and his weapons among his civilian
population.

Which weapons are you referring to???

French-made Roland surface-to-air missiles, bombs and grenades hidden in
mosques and under Iraqi homes, etc.

http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/pol/terror/01122107.htm
"According to the Times account, Saeed said that Iraq had begun using
rooms
in or under villas in residential areas and in commercial areas during
the
Persian Gulf War to protect weapons sites from American bombing, but
that
they had now become a permanent feature of Iraq's weapons programs."

Duh. If WE were invaded by a sophisticated army, where would YOU hide
weapons, Einstein? :-) In a big warehouse with the word "wEpinZ" spray
painted on all four sides?

I believe it's against the Geneva Convention to hide them in civilian
buildings.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
DSK wrote:
"DSK" wrote
.... Clinton actually had the moral integrity ....


John Gaquin wrote:
WHOA!! Now there's an irony for the ages!

Yep.

Answer this question.

Person 1 has illicit sex. Person 2 kills over 5,000 innocent people
who were in his way. Which one is more immoral?

DSK



Why, the Democrat, of course. Killing people is perfectly okay if you
are a Republican conservative.

Hey Harry, is it OK to kill babies just because you don't want them?

Bob

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Today's news says our gov't isn't sure the Iraqis are properly equipped
to
handle a trial.

Duh. Why not? I mean, with no organized government and all........


So? Based on my admittedly strict definition, neither do we! My definition
includes having a lucid leader of some sort.