"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Liberals definitely have a strong case of the fuglies. And they wonder
why
they can't get a job!

You take the trophy for the most dim-witted statement of the week, NOYB.

Liberals come in all shapes and sizes, just like people who aren't
liberal.

Come to think of it, most Hollywood movie stars are pretty liberal. Do
you
consider those folks "fugly"?

There are fugly liberals and dumb liberals. Hollywood holds the monopoly
on
the dumb liberals.


Many of whom are much brighter than you,

Maybe some of them...but not many.

and earn as much in a day as
you will earn in a lifetime.

I didn't realize that a person's income directly correlated to his/her IQ.

Bert Robbins wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
"Sam" wrote in message
om...
"Thomas Ranger" wrote in message
...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
...might get a smile out of this:

http://www.sorryeverybody.com/gallery/1/



--
A passing thought:

... "Facts are stubborn things" - T. Smollett

Fact is, they look like a bunch of stubborn sore losers.

Tom

I expect sore losers, it's only human, but you who have just 'won' by
a measly 3% seem to have created a new genre, sore winners. It will be
interesting to see how this all works out down the road.

You know what they say...it might have been ugly but, we get to add one
to
the W column.

The right side won and the left side lost. If we won by one vote it would
still be a win.

When you can convince 50% plus 1 that your policies are better then you
can
rub our noses in it but, until then sit down and shut up!


As if what you posted mattered...

It winds you up enough that you respond. So, I guess it matters to you!




Winds me up? Bert, I'm used to dealing with "heavier" situations and
people than twerps like you. You're not even a canape.

--
A passing thought:

.... And the only thing the Borg left was this MacIntosh...

NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Liberals definitely have a strong case of the fuglies. And they wonder
why
they can't get a job!

You take the trophy for the most dim-witted statement of the week, NOYB.

Liberals come in all shapes and sizes, just like people who aren't
liberal.

Come to think of it, most Hollywood movie stars are pretty liberal. Do
you
consider those folks "fugly"?

There are fugly liberals and dumb liberals. Hollywood holds the monopoly
on
the dumb liberals.


Many of whom are much brighter than you,

Maybe some of them...but not many.

Oh, really? Let's see...let's pretend.
"I'm a fairly bright guy...do I want to be a dentist in Dumfoch,
Florida, or a mogul in Hollywood."



--
A passing thought:

"Great ideas need landing gear as well as wings." -- C. D. Jackson

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...

You take the trophy for the most dim-witted statement of the week, NOYB.

Liberals come in all shapes and sizes, just like people who aren't
liberal.

Come to think of it, most Hollywood movie stars are pretty liberal. Do you
consider those folks "fugly"?

Do you believe that those who live outside the city limits come in all
shapes and sizes or are they all the same? " Ah yes, Suburbia. Where
everybody lives on a dead end street.
Suburbanities endure private "covenants" requiring them to conform to the
neighbors, so that when it is time to paint the cloned house (with the
cloned landscaping) any thought of individual expression is squelched in
favor of the "public
good." Suburbia, the fantasy consumption neighborhood where the economy
produces nothing and the SUV is a god. Suburbia is a land of economic
imperialism- all wealth and resources in Suburbia are extracted from some
remote area
(the city to which all commute). Suburbia, the primarily lilly white land
of
cultural conformity."

Is it possible that you might have stole the prize from NYOB?

In article , says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,

What's even more heartening are the responses from those that understand
people with higher IQs.


"those that", eh?

Couldn't find anything else about which to sniff my butt?

Is it possible that you might have stole the prize from NYOB?


I doubt it. But its beyond possible, in fact it is a demonstrated fact, that
you cannot distinguish between a criticism of living conditions in Suburbia
with a critcism of Subuarbanites.

Or so you would have everyone believe.

JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 20:33:43 -0500, "NOYB" wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
...might get a smile out of this:

http://www.sorryeverybody.com/gallery/1/



Funny. Before I even opened that link, I already knew what those folks
would look like...and the pictures didn't disappoint.


Liberals definitely have a strong case of the fuglies. And they wonder why
they can't get a job!

Look at this broad:
http://www.sorryeverybody.com/upload_files/se26.jpg

She's a pretender. She's wishing she lived in a red state.

John H

Perhaps you ought to move to the redneck part of Virginia,
Herring...after all, Kerry racked up huge vote totals in Fairfax County,
Arlington and Alexandria, where you live and work, besting Bush by more
than 75,000 votes in those jurisdictions.

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Is it possible that you might have stole the prize from NYOB?


I doubt it. But its beyond possible, in fact it is a demonstrated fact,
that
you cannot distinguish between a criticism of living conditions in
Suburbia
with a critcism of Subuarbanites.

Gould said:
"Suburbia, the fantasy consumption neighborhood where the economy
produces nothing and the SUV is a god. Suburbia is a land of economic
imperialism- all wealth and resources in Suburbia are extracted from some
remote area (the city to which all commute). Suburbia, the primarily lilly
white land
of cultural conformity."

I am ignoring the fact, that your statement is incorrect, but it sure sounds
like a criticism of Suburbanites to me. Imagine if I said,
"Cities, where people live like rats stacked on top of each other, living in
dirt and squalor because they are too lazy to pick up their own trash.
Cities are a land of drug abusers whose god is their next fix. Cities,
where prostitution is rampant. Cities, the primarily land of those who have
failed at life".

Neither one of these statements are correct, but both are criticisms of
those who live in the city or suburbia. For you to say that Suburbanites
elevates an SUV to the status of a god, was a criticism of suburbanites.
The fact that you failed to see that shows how deeply ingrained your bigotry
is. You remind me of racists who say, "I'm not a racist, some of my best
friends are black".

The "excellent" article you highlighted where the other's premise was ""And
we are the real Americans. They--rural, red-state voters, the denizens of
the exurbs--are not real Americans. They are rubes, fools, and
hate-mongers.""

Imagine if I made a post saying here is a excellent web site. Anyone with
an interest in the black vs. white political dynamic will enjoy reading this
excellent, thought-provoking web site. It's loads very slowly, but it is
insightful and worth waiting for. http://www.kkk.bz/index1.htm

A few hours later you said "There's virtually no way this country will ever
come together again. Not as
long as one side or the other thinks that compromise is either an insult to
intelligence or a sin against the Bible. We're in the last generations of
the American Empire, I suspect."

It sounds very similar to the "US vs. Them" mentality that the KKK preaches.
Instead of separating from other American's we need to pull together for our
common welfare.

I am ignoring the fact, that your statement is incorrect, but it sure sounds
like a criticism of Suburbanites to me.

You are entitled to your opinion. The paragraph you quote is critical of
Suburbia, a place, and some of the conditions commonly encountered there.

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
I am ignoring the fact, that your statement is incorrect, but it sure
sounds
like a criticism of Suburbanites to me.

You are entitled to your opinion. The paragraph you quote is critical of
Suburbia, a place, and some of the conditions commonly encountered there.

Cities, the last bastion of simpletons, drug addicts, prostitution, grime,
pollution, and democrats.

Would that be considered critical of those who live in cities?

ps - I do not endorse or agree with the description of cities.