Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack Redington wrote:
tony thomas wrote: Be carefull w/ putting a lot of hp into a boat that was not designed for it. I/O type boats - if overpowered - will run sideways due to the torque of the engine. The boat is just not designed hull wise for a big hp/torque power plant. They come w/ V8 but at about 250 hp or so. If you put 400+ hp in it you may find that it does not run straight. I had a buddy that had a 19ft rs? Bowrider with the Z-Plane hull. with a 4.6 V6 the thing would do around 50mph. But it pounded any waves it hit. One of the hardest riding boats I was ever on. The botton was pretty flat. I have no idea what the deadrise was. Capt Jack R.. That's what I like about the Stingray... a 50 MPH boat with just the 4.3 liter. On our little pond, the hull would be fine. Rob |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
trainfan1 wrote:
Jack Redington wrote: tony thomas wrote: Be carefull w/ putting a lot of hp into a boat that was not designed for it. I/O type boats - if overpowered - will run sideways due to the torque of the engine. The boat is just not designed hull wise for a big hp/torque power plant. They come w/ V8 but at about 250 hp or so. If you put 400+ hp in it you may find that it does not run straight. I had a buddy that had a 19ft rs? Bowrider with the Z-Plane hull. with a 4.6 V6 the thing would do around 50mph. But it pounded any waves it hit. One of the hardest riding boats I was ever on. The botton was pretty flat. I have no idea what the deadrise was. Capt Jack R.. That's what I like about the Stingray... a 50 MPH boat with just the 4.3 liter. On our little pond, the hull would be fine. Rob Yep most boats have a enviroment that suits them well. If lots of big boat wakes are not a problem the one my buddy had would be great, on gas preformance etc. Lake Lanier was not a good home for it :-) Cheers Capt Jack R. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm doing low 60's in my 5.7 19.5" and it tracks straight. A little
squirley in light chop at that speed. Definately not a boat for rough water though, pounds like hell. I think with a little more prop I could get to 65. Or a blower :-) "tony thomas" wrote in message news:KaPsd.448578$wV.385074@attbi_s54... Which creates drag and partially defeats the purpose of more hp. -- Tony my boats and cars at http://t.thomas.home.mchsi.com "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 20:14:29 GMT, "tony thomas" wrote: It is really fom the prop. You would be turning a lot bigger pitch prop than stock which will pull on the boat more than the hull can support. =============== Easily fixable with trim tabs in my experience. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 15:08:06 -0500, "Kyle" wrote:
anyone own a stingray powerboat I have a Stingray 240CS. It's a good boat at a reasonable price. It's a cheaply produced boat in some ways, but solid enough and suits my needs just fine. I bought it new at the end of 2002 and I've had very few problems with it. It rides great in the open ocean ( I go pretty far offshore in it in New England waters,) and tops out close to 50mph. My 240cs fits my needs well as I need a boat that is fairly big, easy to trailer, can live aboard for a week or so fairly comfortably, has an enclosed head, stove and sink. I also wanted a cushy boat with nice seats and good styling. I paid only about $38k for it brand new with 5.0L EFI Mercruiser and included a galvanized trailer as well as a few other extras I threw in like a cockpit cover and full camper canvas. Compare that to the cost of a similar Maxum and you'll see a major price difference. IMHO, I think the quality of a Maxum is better , but not THAT much better than the Stingray to justify the large price difference. Anyway, you can check out the models at www.stingrayboats.com For other reasonably priced pleasure boats you might check out Rinker boats or Sea Ray boats. .. For fishing boats I'd go for Parkers, Sea Swirls, or ( expensive) Grady Whites. John C. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 02:04:07 GMT, "JamesgangNC"
wrote: I'm doing low 60's in my 5.7 19.5" and it tracks straight. A little squirley in light chop at that speed. Definately not a boat for rough water though, pounds like hell. I think with a little more prop I could get to 65. Or a blower :-) I bought a brand new 23' Stingray about 10 years ago. It was a fast boat, but it was built too light, and suffered accordingly. Read my full review he http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj/stingray.htm Dave |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Problems with Stingray Boat HELP | Cruising | |||
23 Ft. Stingray? | Cruising | |||
Can anyone identify this "1986 Stingray" | General | |||
Any caveats on this boat: 1992 18FT STINGRAY BOWRIDER | General | |||
FS: 1998 Stingray 200cs in Maryland | Marketplace |