Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
We do the screw line up thing all the time on firearms.
It's pretty easy to do, really. The screws all have extra high heads on them for fitting . We install the screws, scribe an index mark on them to orient the same way, then remove screws. Cut off the protruding high head and file new slot using index mark to guide. Reinstall screws and VOILA...they all line up, properly torqued. "Backyard Renegade" wrote in message om... While this may lead one to assume, and may be rightfully so, that the builder was very intent on doing a good job on the vessel, from a structural point of view, I wonder how you would keep the tourqe even across a part unless you had a perfectly aligned start to each screw, in material that was more consistant than wood. My first gut tells me that this could lead to uneven warping or other problems. Granted, this may be in a part of the boat where it would not happen, and the builder noted obviously has a lot more experience than I, but I have been working with the wood long and it just makes me say hummmmm. Of course Chuck could end my concern with a full report on the boat! Scotty from SmallBoats.com |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"bomar" wrote in message ...
We do the screw line up thing all the time on firearms. It's pretty easy to do, really. The screws all have extra high heads on them for fitting . We install the screws, scribe an index mark on them to orient the same way, then remove screws. Cut off the protruding high head and file new slot using index mark to guide. Reinstall screws and VOILA...they all line up, properly torqued. When writing the origional post I considered addressing the issue of machine screws in metal, but forgot. Still, I doubt they do it building a boat. Unfortunately, I will probably not get an answer here as the ones who could answer are more concerened with politics... and I don't agree with theirs so..... "Backyard Renegade" wrote in message om... While this may lead one to assume, and may be rightfully so, that the builder was very intent on doing a good job on the vessel, from a structural point of view, I wonder how you would keep the tourqe even across a part unless you had a perfectly aligned start to each screw, in material that was more consistant than wood. My first gut tells me that this could lead to uneven warping or other problems. Granted, this may be in a part of the boat where it would not happen, and the builder noted obviously has a lot more experience than I, but I have been working with the wood long and it just makes me say hummmmm. Of course Chuck could end my concern with a full report on the boat! Scotty from SmallBoats.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Backyard Renegade" wrote in message om... "bomar" wrote in message ... We do the screw line up thing all the time on firearms. It's pretty easy to do, really. The screws all have extra high heads on them for fitting . We install the screws, scribe an index mark on them to orient the same way, then remove screws. Cut off the protruding high head and file new slot using index mark to guide. Reinstall screws and VOILA...they all line up, properly torqued. When writing the origional post I considered addressing the issue of machine screws in metal, but forgot. Still, I doubt they do it building a boat. Unfortunately, I will probably not get an answer here as the ones who could answer are more concerened with politics... and I don't agree with theirs so..... snip As indicated, this custom fitting involves hand manufacturing a screw to account for process variations. This adds a lot of expense for very little gain. Also, I would wonder if these screws are still interchangeable. With NC tooling is perfectly possible to get the threads to start in the same place on every hole. It is not always possible to get screws that have the same phase relationship between the threads and the slots. Even if you can get screws that have good repeatability you still have to contend with minor variations in paint and stock thickness. If this requirement came across my desk as part of a design, I would probably redline it and send it back to the engineer/salesman that wrote it up. Give the number of fasteners that don't show a visible orientation, I would urge that the designers change the method of manufacture to achieve a pleasing appearance. In many American companies, manufacturing engineering and quality control are considered useless appendages, not a vital way to keep the company competitive and profitable. Many companies feel that they don't even need to mess with this foolishness and don't even formally consider these aspects. Then they wonder why foreign companies deliver a cheaper and better product. The usual answer is just that the labor is cheaper. It completely eludes them that retooling and improving an existing product is better than trying to churn out more of the same old thing cheaper. The old school method (add labor to make it work) is one of the reasons that USA products are more expensive than they should be. A different approach is to re-engineer the part with ease of manufacture in mind. I was just reading an article about a Chinese factory that was presented with a demand to increase production to meet pre-Christmas sales. The pacing element was a mold that produces the case parts. When they made another mold, instead of just making a copy of the existing part, they took their experience in making the parts and redesigned it to eliminate the time consuming fasteners. As hard as it may be to imagine, they designed out the "expensive" Chinese labor! In another thread we are hashing out wood/plastic/glass/aluminum/steel as the best building material. This sort of continued reexamination in the foundations of how things are done is the best way to make a better boat. As a casual aside for the boat builder in the group, have you reexamined every "truth" in your manufacturing to see if there is a way to improve the process? Is stitch and glue still the best way to make little boats? Even then, have you looked at the newest glues, latest fibers? How much time do you spend trying out new ways of making joints? For the *absolute* cheapest utility boat, could you make an Inuit style boat from PVC water pipes and a blue plastic tarp? Are there better ways of protecting aluminum and steel to keep them from rotting apart in use? To my way of thinking, welded aluminum is the best overall way of making a boat. For a larger boat, steel offers the best overall material. In both, effective corrosion control is the elusive brass ring. As witnessed by the ongoing discussions about heads, heaters, carpets, fittings, lights, and finishes (particularly bottom paint) all of these areas have a long way to go to reach perfection. I would like to think that we can do it ourselves, but sometimes I wonder if perhaps the best way to improve these parts is to send them over to a Chinese company to have them set up tooling. We learned this from Japan in the 50s: If you want the absolute cheapest part, they could do it but is was *clearly* inferior. If you were willing to pay the same price, they could often make a much better part. China has taken the place of Japan in this regard. Mark Browne --Who has way too much time on his hands on this new-years day! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I drilled a pilot hole in a piece of pine and ran a sheet metal screw
through a piece of veneer into the pine until it was very snug. I then put a 0-600 inch pound torque wrench on the screw and turned it 90° tighter (to 'line it up'). I couldn't measure the difference on the wrench. I couldn't 'feel' any difference in the tightness. I couldn't observe any difference in the depth of the screw. I tried the same thing with veneer into oak. Same results. I tried the oak without the veneer. Same results. Guess what the results were using a phillips screw that only needed a maximum of 45° to line it up? For yucks, I tested a 10X32 stainless machine screw in a brass nut. No measurable difference. I could measure a 25 inch pound difference for 45° when putting a 10X24 stainless machine screw into a stainless nut but on the second try it went right into place at the original torque. How can we say anything about lining up the screws except it's the mark of someone who know that cares? Nick in Spartanburg, SC http://www.geocities.com/jeff_nicholas/BBR.html "Backyard Renegade" wrote in message om... While this may lead one to assume, and may be rightfully so, that the builder was very intent on doing a good job on the vessel, from a structural point of view, I wonder how you would keep the tourqe even across a part unless you had a perfectly aligned start to each screw, in material that was more consistant than wood. My first gut tells me that this could lead to uneven warping or other problems. Granted, this may be in a part of the boat where it would not happen, and the builder noted obviously has a lot more experience than I, but I have been working with the wood long and it just makes me say hummmmm. Of course Chuck could end my concern with a full report on the boat! Scotty from SmallBoats.com |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Nick in Spartanburg, SC" wrote in message ...
I drilled a pilot hole in a piece of pine and ran a sheet metal screw through a piece of veneer into the pine until it was very snug. I then put a 0-600 inch pound torque wrench on the screw and turned it 90° tighter (to 'line it up'). I couldn't measure the difference on the wrench. I couldn't 'feel' any difference in the tightness. I couldn't observe any difference in the depth of the screw. I tried the same thing with veneer into oak. Same results. I tried the oak without the veneer. Same results. Guess what the results were using a phillips screw that only needed a maximum of 45° to line it up? For yucks, I tested a 10X32 stainless machine screw in a brass nut. No measurable difference. I could measure a 25 inch pound difference for 45° when putting a 10X24 stainless machine screw into a stainless nut but on the second try it went right into place at the original torque. How can we say anything about lining up the screws except it's the mark of someone who know that cares? Nick in Spartanburg, SC http://www.geocities.com/jeff_nicholas/BBR.html Well, I hope I did not offend anyone by asking ![]() you did your homework in the shop, But what about 5 years from now, after being subjected to the beating of the water, outside the shop in the real world? I work with wood, it walks, and it will bunch up around screws anyway. We do not know the thickness of the wood, length of the screws, depth of the bite, etc... I still say, in some circumstances, this practice could cause a problem, but that is just me. Scotty "Backyard Renegade" wrote in message om... While this may lead one to assume, and may be rightfully so, that the builder was very intent on doing a good job on the vessel, from a structural point of view, I wonder how you would keep the tourqe even across a part unless you had a perfectly aligned start to each screw, in material that was more consistant than wood. My first gut tells me that this could lead to uneven warping or other problems. Granted, this may be in a part of the boat where it would not happen, and the builder noted obviously has a lot more experience than I, but I have been working with the wood long and it just makes me say hummmmm. Of course Chuck could end my concern with a full report on the boat! Scotty from SmallBoats.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Birthdate of Norman Maclean | General | |||
Where to find ramp stories? | General | |||
Help looking for a Bottom Line 220 Dual manual | General | |||
Through-hull and main water pickup line. | General | |||
Fuel pump to carbs fuel line replacement | General |