"NOYB" wrote in message
...

In the past two weeks, I've heard analyses by people who know these
things,
saying that Bin Laden is likely to be a non-issue at this point.
However,
9/11 gave quite a bit of confidence to thugs who are in no way connected
with OBL. But, just to entertain idiots, let's assume this was false.
Where
would YOU pursue OBL

I'd remove Afghanistan as a training base for terrorists. I'd remove
Saddam
as a financial supporter of terrorists. I'd then occupy Iraq for two
reasons: 1) to ensure a safe flow of oil should the House of Saud be
overrun
by extremists, and 2) as a launching point into Syria and Iran.
I'd also occupy Afghanistan as a launching point into Iran and Pakistan.
I'd then march right into the hills in Northwestern Pakistan and grab OBL.

Oh boy. You are truly delusional.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...

In the past two weeks, I've heard analyses by people who know these
things,
saying that Bin Laden is likely to be a non-issue at this point.
However,
9/11 gave quite a bit of confidence to thugs who are in no way
connected
with OBL. But, just to entertain idiots, let's assume this was false.
Where
would YOU pursue OBL

I'd remove Afghanistan as a training base for terrorists. I'd remove
Saddam
as a financial supporter of terrorists. I'd then occupy Iraq for two
reasons: 1) to ensure a safe flow of oil should the House of Saud be
overrun
by extremists, and 2) as a launching point into Syria and Iran.
I'd also occupy Afghanistan as a launching point into Iran and Pakistan.
I'd then march right into the hills in Northwestern Pakistan and grab
OBL.

Oh boy. You are truly delusional.

Hehehehe. The best part is that everything I've said has happened, is
happening, or *will* happen in the not too distant future.

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...


I'd remove Afghanistan as a training base for terrorists. I'd remove
Saddam
as a financial supporter of terrorists. I'd then occupy Iraq for two
reasons: 1) to ensure a safe flow of oil should the House of Saud be
overrun
by extremists, and 2) as a launching point into Syria and Iran.
I'd also occupy Afghanistan as a launching point into Iran and
Pakistan.
I'd then march right into the hills in Northwestern Pakistan and grab
OBL.

Oh boy. You are truly delusional.

Hehehehe. The best part is that everything I've said has happened, is
happening, or *will* happen in the not too distant future.

Perhaps, but the problem is that you take such pleasure in the prospect of
war. You need to get some help. Real soldiers don't view war that way.

I'd like to see you dare march into Pakistan. Don't forget they have nukes
also and are used to facing a bigger foe in India.

NOYB wrote in message
ink.net...


Hehehehe. The best part is that everything I've said has happened, is
happening, or *will* happen in the not too distant future.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...


I'm going to use lots of white space here to make it simpler for you to
follow along. If it seems the message has ended, be sure to page down and
check first.

These are all positive goals. Why do you have a problem with them?

Because I feel as though our "damaged" credibility, damaged alliances,
and
heightened tension is with countries that we shouldn't be reaching out
to
in
the first place. For instance, our supposed allies...France, Russia and
China...were secretly skirting the Iraqi arms embargo, and were making
under-the-table oil deals with Saddam should sanctions be removed. We
don't
owe them an apology.

Translation: Profit-making entities were making oil deals which depended
on
certain political outcomes. Are you stupid enough to think American
companies don't do that every single day, with every natural resource you
can name? Answer the question. Are you that stupid? It's yes or no.

White space. Room for you to think.
=========================



Meanwhile, Syria was sponsoring terrorist acts against Israel,
laundering
money for Saddam, sending weapons to Iraq, and likely concealing
Saddam's
WMD program. They are very likely next on our list after Iraq.

Are you stupid enough to lump Syria into the same category as France,
Russia
and China? Yes or no?

White space. Room for you to think.
=========================




Iran also sponsors terrorist acts against our ally, Israel. They have
also
been pursuing nuclear weapons, and have been inciting unrest in Iraq to
damage US resolve. They should and will be dealt with once Bush is
reelected.

Pursuing nuclear weapons? Shut your cake hole. They're doing exactly what
we
are - trying to expand their arsenal. On the spectrum of angels, we're the
closest thing to the devil.

This is the morally bankrupt liberals battle cry.

Bob

NOYB wrote:
I'd also occupy Afghanistan as a launching point into Iran and Pakistan.
I'd then march right into the hills in Northwestern Pakistan and grab

Hehehehe. The best part is that everything I've said has happened, is
happening, or *will* happen in the not too distant future.

In other words, more unprovoked wars of aggression... I assume that
you're a stockholder in a few of the defense contracting corporate
conglomerates? So that you can participate in the profits?

What if your kids got drafted? Would you still be in favor of this program?

NOBBY, you can't *really* be this screwed up. You better back off just a
little or the others will realize that you're a far left-wing agitator
posing as a Bush worshipper...

DSK

"Don White" wrote in message
news
I'd like to see you dare march into Pakistan. Don't forget they have nukes
also and are used to facing a bigger foe in India.

NOYB wrote in message
ink.net...


Hehehehe. The best part is that everything I've said has happened, is
happening, or *will* happen in the not too distant future.

"Jerry Steele" wrote in message
om...
will Al-Qaeda support?
Ant democrat.

Although most Pakistani's would frown on it, Musharraf would welcome
us...and, BTW, we're already *in* Pakistan. The only reason we didn't go in
sooner is that Musharraf was afraid he'd be killed by his own people if he
let us in. However, after two failed assassination attempts, he decided that
he's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't.



"Don White" wrote in message
news
I'd like to see you dare march into Pakistan. Don't forget they have nukes
also and are used to facing a bigger foe in India.

NOYB wrote in message
ink.net...


Hehehehe. The best part is that everything I've said has happened, is
happening, or *will* happen in the not too distant future.

"Robert White" wrote in message
...

Pursuing nuclear weapons? Shut your cake hole. They're doing exactly
what
we
are - trying to expand their arsenal. On the spectrum of angels, we're
the
closest thing to the devil.

This is the morally bankrupt liberals battle cry.

Bob



We're breaking treaties WE fought hard for. What you YOU call that?