BTW - If you are going to pretend to be some sort of "writer", you
really should learn the difference between "effect" and "affect".


rusty redcloud


***********
I don't pretend, or claim, to be anything. But one sure sign of a
losing argument is the switch of focus from substance to spelling and
syntax.

If you're going to pretend to discuss speed within the context of
navigation, you would do well to avoid an attempt to prop up an
incorrect usage with the invention of a new concept.

I thought it was bring in Hitler and Nazi's into the discussion was a sure
sign you were losing an argument.


wrote in message
oups.com...
BTW - If you are going to pretend to be some sort of "writer", you
really should learn the difference between "effect" and "affect".


rusty redcloud


***********
I don't pretend, or claim, to be anything. But one sure sign of a
losing argument is the switch of focus from substance to spelling and
syntax.

If you're going to pretend to discuss speed within the context of
navigation, you would do well to avoid an attempt to prop up an
incorrect usage with the invention of a new concept.

BTW - If you are going to pretend to be some sort of "writer", you
really should learn the difference between "effect" and "affect".

rusty redcloud


***********
I don't pretend, or claim, to be anything. But one sure sign of a
losing argument is the switch of focus from substance to spelling and
syntax.


If you're going to pretend to discuss speed within the context of
navigation, you would do well to avoid an attempt to prop up an
incorrect usage with the invention of a new concept.



??? You are even more lost and confused than previous estimates
indicated.

rusty redcloud


***************

In addition to nit picking spelling and grammar, another sure sign that
a poster's argument is
full of crap is the introduction of personal insult.

Thanks for the classic example, twice in a row.

On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:06:18 GMT, Red Cloud®
wrote:

You were wrong from the start, and you remain wrong. There is in fact a proper
usage of the term KPH, and I illustrated it clearly with several examples.

===================================

You are as full of misdirected certitude as you are of biological
waste products.

Now go away.

On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:02:13 GMT, Red Cloud©
wrote:

your arguments are invalid, and classical examples of
someone who cannot win an argument with facts.

=====================================

See previous post on this topic...