Steven,
Jim,,, can not read how can you expect him to count.


"Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message
news
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 02:12:15 GMT, "Jim," wrote:

Steven Shelikoff wrote:

On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 01:27:34 GMT, "Jim," wrote:


Why all the bitching about OT posts -- If *I* can go to all the trouble
of labeling them (as do others) What is *YOUR* problem with installing
an OT filter. Them who want to argue politics, religion, whatever, can,
and them who don't let the filter do the work.

In Netscape and mozilla it's tools/message filters/new/ set to if
subject contains OT/ move to trash or read


Can I just ask you why you start so many off topic threads here in the
first place?

Steve

Someone has to counter all the right wing BS I see here -- think of it
as making the group "fair and balanced"

When the righties stop, so will I

Why don't you go and count up all the off topic threads started by you
and your left wing idiots and then the ones started by the right wing
wackos and see if the group is as "fair and balanced" as you claim
you're trying to make it. I think you'll find that the threads started
by left wing idiots outnumber the others by several times.

So if you're trying to make it fair and balanced, how about you limit
yourself to one new thread for every one new thread started by the right
wing? And if someone like harry gets there first, you missed your
chance and have to wait until the next one?

That seems fair and balanced, doesn't it?

Steve