I'd like to learn more about PGP. How did you determine the PGP
signature was bad?

GK

Argyle wrote:
On Sun, 29 May 2005 22:13:22 GMT, John Baker wrote:


On 29 May 2005 21:05:01 -0000, lid
(Anonymous) wrote:

...and yet, unlike many brain-dead neocon assholes, they post under
their real names from their real accounts. Go figure.



It was a troll post. Unfortunately these trolls have nothing better to do.
Check the PGP signatu PGP Signature Status: bad

***[5/29/2005 6:22:38 PM] PGP Signature Status: bad
***[5/29/2005 6:22:38 PM] Hash: SHA1
***[5/29/2005 6:22:38 PM] Signer: Daniel Joseph Min
***[5/29/2005 6:22:38 PM] Signer Key ID: 0x2B1CCFE7
***[5/29/2005 6:22:38 PM] Signer Key Fingerprint: B272 2207 50DA EB01 ED62
FCF0 9963 0FB6 2B1C CFE7
***[5/29/2005 6:22:38 PM] Signer Key Status: Invalid
***[5/29/2005 6:22:38 PM] Signed: 5/29/2005 10:35:27 AM
***[5/29/2005 6:22:38 PM] Verified: 5/29/2005 6:22:38 PM
***[5/29/2005 6:22:38 PM] BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***

I just verified it myself. It was not signed by the poster. In other words,
it is a trolling fake.

Argyle