Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From the AP:
Economists remaine cautious. "It is too early to celebrate," said Sung Won Sohn, chief economist at Wells Fargo in Minneapolis. *He noted that most of the increase was because of part-time workers. The number of people who worked part time for economic reasons rose to 4.7 million in March, up from 4.4 million the previous month.* (Part-time workers...no benefits...the GOP dream) "The average duration of unemployment has been lengthening, persuading unemployed workers to accept part-time jobs," Sohn said. In March, there were 8.35 million people unemployed, compared with 8.17 million the previous month. The average duration of unemployment has been more than 20 weeks, a 20-year high. (A 20-year high....the highest since the Resgan era) Technical factors also contributed to the overall hiring increase, Sohn said. Good weather helped boost employment in construction, which rose by 71,000 last month. The end of a strike by California grocery workers was a big factor in the increase in retailers' payrolls, which were up by 47,000. (Ahh,k weather and the end of a strike. Now that's Bush job creation for you) The average monthly gain in jobs in the past eight months has been about 95,000 - far below the 150,000 to 200,000 jobs needed to absorb new entrants into the labor force, Sohn said. Like last month, the unemployment rate could rise in coming months as workers decide to resume their job searches. "So overall, this is a good employment report but not a super employment report," said Anthony Chan, chief economist at Banc One Investment Advisors. The jobless rate for blacks rose to 10.2 percent from 9.8 percent in February. For whites, the rate rose to 5.1 percent from 4.9 percent. It remained unchanged at 7.4 percent for Hispanics. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks. It's been fun watching you try to rationalize the amazingly strong
employment numbers. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NOYB wrote:
Thanks. It's been fun watching you try to rationalize the amazingly strong employment numbers. Amazingly strong? Bull****. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: Thanks. It's been fun watching you try to rationalize the amazingly strong employment numbers. Amazingly strong? Bull****. You are correct Harry. In fact they are amazingly *good* (not strong) considering what we have gone through, including 9-11, the war on terrorists and a worldwide recession. And considering the average unemployment rates in the 1970s', the 1980's and the 1990's 5.7% is quite good. Thanks for the correction Harry.. ;-) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Come on there Harry,,,
Your going to have to give your head a shake after this one. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... From the AP: Economists remaine cautious. "It is too early to celebrate," said Sung Won Sohn, chief economist at Wells Fargo in Minneapolis. *He noted that most of the increase was because of part-time workers. The number of people who worked part time for economic reasons rose to 4.7 million in March, up from 4.4 million the previous month.* (Part-time workers...no benefits...the GOP dream) "The average duration of unemployment has been lengthening, persuading unemployed workers to accept part-time jobs," Sohn said. In March, there were 8.35 million people unemployed, compared with 8.17 million the previous month. The average duration of unemployment has been more than 20 weeks, a 20-year high. (A 20-year high....the highest since the Resgan era) Technical factors also contributed to the overall hiring increase, Sohn said. Good weather helped boost employment in construction, which rose by 71,000 last month. The end of a strike by California grocery workers was a big factor in the increase in retailers' payrolls, which were up by 47,000. (Ahh,k weather and the end of a strike. Now that's Bush job creation for you) The average monthly gain in jobs in the past eight months has been about 95,000 - far below the 150,000 to 200,000 jobs needed to absorb new entrants into the labor force, Sohn said. Like last month, the unemployment rate could rise in coming months as workers decide to resume their job searches. "So overall, this is a good employment report but not a super employment report," said Anthony Chan, chief economist at Banc One Investment Advisors. The jobless rate for blacks rose to 10.2 percent from 9.8 percent in February. For whites, the rate rose to 5.1 percent from 4.9 percent. It remained unchanged at 7.4 percent for Hispanics. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tuuk wrote:
Come on there Harry,,, Your going to have to give your head a shake after this one. You've already demonstrated your inability to think clearly or even to hold a job for more than 30 days, fella. Try reading for content. Most non-political Economists are unconvinced we are having a real recovery in jobs. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... From the AP: Economists remaine cautious. "It is too early to celebrate," said Sung Won Sohn, chief economist at Wells Fargo in Minneapolis. *He noted that most of the increase was because of part-time workers. The number of people who worked part time for economic reasons rose to 4.7 million in March, up from 4.4 million the previous month.* (Part-time workers...no benefits...the GOP dream) "The average duration of unemployment has been lengthening, persuading unemployed workers to accept part-time jobs," Sohn said. In March, there were 8.35 million people unemployed, compared with 8.17 million the previous month. The average duration of unemployment has been more than 20 weeks, a 20-year high. (A 20-year high....the highest since the Resgan era) Technical factors also contributed to the overall hiring increase, Sohn said. Good weather helped boost employment in construction, which rose by 71,000 last month. The end of a strike by California grocery workers was a big factor in the increase in retailers' payrolls, which were up by 47,000. (Ahh,k weather and the end of a strike. Now that's Bush job creation for you) The average monthly gain in jobs in the past eight months has been about 95,000 - far below the 150,000 to 200,000 jobs needed to absorb new entrants into the labor force, Sohn said. Like last month, the unemployment rate could rise in coming months as workers decide to resume their job searches. "So overall, this is a good employment report but not a super employment report," said Anthony Chan, chief economist at Banc One Investment Advisors. The jobless rate for blacks rose to 10.2 percent from 9.8 percent in February. For whites, the rate rose to 5.1 percent from 4.9 percent. It remained unchanged at 7.4 percent for Hispanics. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Come on there Harry,, Your changing the goal posts again to your liking. Not
too smart are ya. Yes Harry, the average educated individual does work for 8 different employers during their careers. Not like you old timers or retirees who worked for only one employer their entire careers. Especially you union types. Harry, I made you a bet before, I will do it again, if you wish to compare say incomes, I will put a thousand U.S.dollars down that my taxable incomes are higher than yours there smarty. For a thousand, I will drive down to where ever you live, real friendly like, prove to you that my last 10 years taxable income was more than yours was in any given year. Dont knock my employments there Harry, I have never belonged to a union, never had the need. While you morons fight for your greedy incomes, mine is earned. Wanna put some money where your mouth is? Back to you Harry, what say you? "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Tuuk wrote: Come on there Harry,,, Your going to have to give your head a shake after this one. You've already demonstrated your inability to think clearly or even to hold a job for more than 30 days, fella. Try reading for content. Most non-political Economists are unconvinced we are having a real recovery in jobs. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... From the AP: Economists remaine cautious. "It is too early to celebrate," said Sung Won Sohn, chief economist at Wells Fargo in Minneapolis. *He noted that most of the increase was because of part-time workers. The number of people who worked part time for economic reasons rose to 4.7 million in March, up from 4.4 million the previous month.* (Part-time workers...no benefits...the GOP dream) "The average duration of unemployment has been lengthening, persuading unemployed workers to accept part-time jobs," Sohn said. In March, there were 8.35 million people unemployed, compared with 8.17 million the previous month. The average duration of unemployment has been more than 20 weeks, a 20-year high. (A 20-year high....the highest since the Resgan era) Technical factors also contributed to the overall hiring increase, Sohn said. Good weather helped boost employment in construction, which rose by 71,000 last month. The end of a strike by California grocery workers was a big factor in the increase in retailers' payrolls, which were up by 47,000. (Ahh,k weather and the end of a strike. Now that's Bush job creation for you) The average monthly gain in jobs in the past eight months has been about 95,000 - far below the 150,000 to 200,000 jobs needed to absorb new entrants into the labor force, Sohn said. Like last month, the unemployment rate could rise in coming months as workers decide to resume their job searches. "So overall, this is a good employment report but not a super employment report," said Anthony Chan, chief economist at Banc One Investment Advisors. The jobless rate for blacks rose to 10.2 percent from 9.8 percent in February. For whites, the rate rose to 5.1 percent from 4.9 percent. It remained unchanged at 7.4 percent for Hispanics. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 17:28:09 -0500, " Tuuk" wrote:
Come on there Harry,, Your changing the goal posts again to your liking. Not too smart are ya. Yes Harry, the average educated individual does work for 8 different employers during their careers. Not like you old timers or retirees who worked for only one employer their entire careers. Especially you union types. Harry, I made you a bet before, I will do it again, if you wish to compare say incomes, I will put a thousand U.S.dollars down that my taxable incomes are higher than yours there smarty. For a thousand, I will drive down to where ever you live, real friendly like, prove to you that my last 10 years taxable income was more than yours was in any given year. Dont knock my employments there Harry, I have never belonged to a union, never had the need. While you morons fight for your greedy incomes, mine is earned. Wanna put some money where your mouth is? Back to you Harry, what say you? Why don't you just compare the size of your genitalia? It would be about as meaningful. Joe Parsons |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tuuk wrote:
Come on there Harry,, Your changing the goal posts again to your liking. Not too smart are ya. Yes Harry, the average educated individual does work for 8 different employers during their careers. Not like you old timers or retirees who worked for only one employer their entire careers. Especially you union types. Harry, I made you a bet before, I will do it again, if you wish to compare say incomes, I will put a thousand U.S.dollars down that my taxable incomes are higher than yours there smarty. My guess is that your brains, your paycheck, and your dick are all pretty small. For a thousand, I will drive down to where ever you live, real friendly like, prove to you that my last 10 years taxable income was more than yours was in any given year. Thanks, I'll pass. I work hard to maintain a vermin-free environment. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ya, its probably a long drive anyway. I gots better things to do.
Since your talking about dicks, I'll pass there, I'm bettin your a bigger dick. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Tuuk wrote: Come on there Harry,, Your changing the goal posts again to your liking. Not too smart are ya. Yes Harry, the average educated individual does work for 8 different employers during their careers. Not like you old timers or retirees who worked for only one employer their entire careers. Especially you union types. Harry, I made you a bet before, I will do it again, if you wish to compare say incomes, I will put a thousand U.S.dollars down that my taxable incomes are higher than yours there smarty. My guess is that your brains, your paycheck, and your dick are all pretty small. For a thousand, I will drive down to where ever you live, real friendly like, prove to you that my last 10 years taxable income was more than yours was in any given year. Thanks, I'll pass. I work hard to maintain a vermin-free environment. |