"John H" wrote in message
...
On 27 Jun 2005 12:43:44 -0700, wrote:



*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
That is why I have not responded to Kevin's question.

You haven't responded because you aren't man enough. You don't
want to
know the truth, because you know that you are wrong. You are
acting
like a little child. You must be sure that I'm Kevin, or else you
wouldn't be calling me him, correct? Well, sadly you are wrong,
and I
think you KNOW you're wrong, or else you'd say, sure, I'll
apologize if
you aren't Kevin. But, alas, like I said before, you aren't
ANYWHERE
NEAR A MAN. Grow up.


Whatever you say Kevin.

You see, you little asswipe, you WRONGLY insist on calling me Kevin.
It
would seem that, because of your ignorant stance on calling me him,
that you could at least be half of a man and apologize when you find
out I'm not him. It would be such a big deal, but you are such an
ignorant little twit that you WRONGLY INSIST on calling me Kevin,
and
are too dumb to know that I'm not him. Get it, you brain dead little
**** stain? Grow up.


Whatever you say Kevin.

See, you ignorant little twit? If you're man enough to call me Kevin,
be ****ing man enough to apologize when you're shown to be wrong!!!
That's all. Are you such a childish little ****ing boy that you have to
resort to idiocy in every single post you make? Oh, unless it's your
two masters Fritz and JohnH. You really should quit, you act like
you're their private little **** boy. Grow up.

I'm no one's master.

Now it sounds like you're berating someone for not believing the proof
you have
yet to show. Or, am I missing something?


Kevin's name calling hypocrisy is showing :-)

He's been acting like this since his bitch slapping.


--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On 27 Jun 2005 11:52:48 -0700, wrote:



Newsgroup Reader wrote:
If you prove you are not Kevin Noble, I will acknowledge that. Since
I do
not think being Kevin Noble is necessarily a bad thing, I see no
reason to
apologize, but you can take my acknowledgement as an apology if you
prefer.

Now tell us how you plan on proving you are not Kevin Noble.

The apology wouldn't be because being Kevin Noble is "necessarily a bad
thing", it would be because you WRONGLY ASSumed I was he, just like
Jim, and when, after being told over and over and over that he and I
are two completely different people, you and Jim still WRONGLY insist
on calling me Kevin Noble. You'll find out in due time how I'll prove
to you I'm not Kevin Noble.

In what ways are you and Kevin different? "Completely different" is a
pretty
broad statement!

Then the whole NG will apology to Kevin Noble for believing he was the
"king of the NG idiots"

On the other hand, asslicker will still hold the title LMAO

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Man enough to call me Kevin.."whoooooooooo"

I apologize when I'm wron, but so far, nothing to be wrong about.

"be f*cking man ...childish little f*cking boy...you're their private
little f*ck boy"

Hmmm, seems most people use this type of language because they either
can't think of anything more intellegent to say, or it makes them feel
reallly big...LOL

"Grow up. "

Ah, maturity in its greatest form....

Kevin,
We eagerly await your proof.


"John H" wrote in message
...
On 27 Jun 2005 11:52:48 -0700, wrote:



Newsgroup Reader wrote:
If you prove you are not Kevin Noble, I will acknowledge that. Since I
do
not think being Kevin Noble is necessarily a bad thing, I see no reason
to
apologize, but you can take my acknowledgement as an apology if you
prefer.

Now tell us how you plan on proving you are not Kevin Noble.

The apology wouldn't be because being Kevin Noble is "necessarily a bad
thing", it would be because you WRONGLY ASSumed I was he, just like
Jim, and when, after being told over and over and over that he and I
are two completely different people, you and Jim still WRONGLY insist
on calling me Kevin Noble. You'll find out in due time how I'll prove
to you I'm not Kevin Noble.

In what ways are you and Kevin different? "Completely different" is a
pretty
broad statement!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


John H wrote:
On 27 Jun 2005 11:52:48 -0700, wrote:



Newsgroup Reader wrote:
If you prove you are not Kevin Noble, I will acknowledge that. Since
I do
not think being Kevin Noble is necessarily a bad thing, I see no
reason to
apologize, but you can take my acknowledgement as an apology if you
prefer.

Now tell us how you plan on proving you are not Kevin Noble.

The apology wouldn't be because being Kevin Noble is "necessarily a bad
thing", it would be because you WRONGLY ASSumed I was he, just like
Jim, and when, after being told over and over and over that he and I
are two completely different people, you and Jim still WRONGLY insist
on calling me Kevin Noble. You'll find out in due time how I'll prove
to you I'm not Kevin Noble.

In what ways are you and Kevin different? "Completely different" is a
pretty
broad statement!
--
John H



Get the idea, nitwit?


2nd post of the day and 1 insult to a NG member already.

WHAAAAAAA!!!! Grow up.

Kevin,
You sound like Harry and his reason why he publishes pictures of his Parker,
but keeps the Lobster Boat hidden.
wrote in message
oups.com...


Newsgroup Reader wrote:
Kevin,
Why don't you just prove it. You know what they say, "the proof is in
the
pudding" and some thing about "bull**** walks"


Because I want ALL of the idiots who think I'm him to be on board with
an apology to me. Simple as that.

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
That is why I have not responded to Kevin's question.

You haven't responded because you aren't man enough. You don't
want
to
know the truth, because you know that you are wrong. You are
acting
like a little child. You must be sure that I'm Kevin, or else
you
wouldn't be calling me him, correct? Well, sadly you are
wrong,
and
I
think you KNOW you're wrong, or else you'd say, sure, I'll
apologize
if
you aren't Kevin. But, alas, like I said before, you aren't
ANYWHERE
NEAR A MAN. Grow up.


Whatever you say Kevin.

You see, you little asswipe, you WRONGLY insist on calling me
Kevin.
It
would seem that, because of your ignorant stance on calling me
him,
that you could at least be half of a man and apologize when you
find
out I'm not him. It would be such a big deal, but you are such an
ignorant little twit that you WRONGLY INSIST on calling me Kevin,
and
are too dumb to know that I'm not him. Get it, you brain dead
little
**** stain? Grow up.


Whatever you say Kevin.

See, you ignorant little twit? If you're man enough to call me
Kevin,
be ****ing man enough to apologize when you're shown to be wrong!!!
That's all. Are you such a childish little ****ing boy that you have
to
resort to idiocy in every single post you make? Oh, unless it's your
two masters Fritz and JohnH. You really should quit, you act like
you're their private little **** boy. Grow up.


Whatever you say Kevin.

My god you are stupid. And I mean it, I've given you a lot of slack,
but, after telling you and telling you, it still doesn't get through to
your ignorant mind. Try this, MAYBE you'll realize where you are wrong.
Take a good, long hard look, Jim, this will take a couple of minutes of
concentration, and I know you're dumb, but try. Take all of the ****
that you THINK you know about me. Now, for someone to come to a
conclusion like you have, you'd have to have at least ONE PIECE of
DEFINITIVE evidence, would you not? What IS that? Hmm, what you don't
HAVE it? All you have it what your suck buddies have told you, and
speculation.....well, you ignoramus, that's your answer!!!!


Whatever you say Kevin.

Potty mouth.

Awe....the whining is hilarious. What ever happened to you vow to not
insult and tell lies, Jim? Another lie.


Whatever you say Kevin.

See? I KNEW you didn't have the brain power to figure it out!!! What an
idiot you are! Going to answer the ****ing question now, **** stain? If
you insist on calling me Kevin, after I've told you a thousand times
that I'm not him, that would mean that you have some difinitive
evidence that I am him, correct, asshole? If so, what is it? Let's see
it, dummy.

Newsgroup Reader wrote:
Kevin,
We eagerly await your proof.

I take it that you either didn't read my reply to you, or else you
can't comprehend it, Smithers.

P. Fritz wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On 27 Jun 2005 12:43:44 -0700, wrote:



*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
That is why I have not responded to Kevin's question.

You haven't responded because you aren't man enough. You don't
want to
know the truth, because you know that you are wrong. You are
acting
like a little child. You must be sure that I'm Kevin, or else you
wouldn't be calling me him, correct? Well, sadly you are wrong,
and I
think you KNOW you're wrong, or else you'd say, sure, I'll
apologize if
you aren't Kevin. But, alas, like I said before, you aren't
ANYWHERE
NEAR A MAN. Grow up.


Whatever you say Kevin.

You see, you little asswipe, you WRONGLY insist on calling me Kevin.
It
would seem that, because of your ignorant stance on calling me him,
that you could at least be half of a man and apologize when you find
out I'm not him. It would be such a big deal, but you are such an
ignorant little twit that you WRONGLY INSIST on calling me Kevin,
and
are too dumb to know that I'm not him. Get it, you brain dead little
**** stain? Grow up.


Whatever you say Kevin.

See, you ignorant little twit? If you're man enough to call me Kevin,
be ****ing man enough to apologize when you're shown to be wrong!!!
That's all. Are you such a childish little ****ing boy that you have to
resort to idiocy in every single post you make? Oh, unless it's your
two masters Fritz and JohnH. You really should quit, you act like
you're their private little **** boy. Grow up.

I'm no one's master.

Now it sounds like you're berating someone for not believing the proof
you have
yet to show. Or, am I missing something?


Kevin's name calling hypocrisy is showing :-)

He's been acting like this since his bitch slapping.
Fritz, get this VERY straight, you punk. You would surely be very sorry
the day that you EVER tried to "bitch slap" me. You are nothing but a
usenet hiding little sissy boy who cuddles up to John, and Jim, and
then stalks me. Grow up, you childish asshole.

P. Fritz wrote:
"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
That is why I have not responded to Kevin's question.

You haven't responded because you aren't man enough. You don't want to
know the truth, because you know that you are wrong. You are acting
like a little child. You must be sure that I'm Kevin, or else you
wouldn't be calling me him, correct? Well, sadly you are wrong, and I
think you KNOW you're wrong, or else you'd say, sure, I'll apologize if
you aren't Kevin. But, alas, like I said before, you aren't ANYWHERE
NEAR A MAN. Grow up.


Whatever you say Kevin.

Kevin determining who is a 'man' priceless

It surely isn't you, you little pussyboy.