| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... wrote: We all agree that Bush seems to have some sort of language dyslexia, however, the obvious concepts make sense. For example, "Make the pie bigger" clearly does not make sense to many liberals who endlessly argue about how to make the pie slices ever so equal but unfortunately ever smaller until most people would starve while some of us argue that the relative sizes dont matter at all, What matters is that the pie is big enough that everybody has enough even though some people manage to get more than others. The idea that teh amount of "wealth" is not fixed comes as a surprise to liberals who seem to really think that wealth somehow is fixed by how much material we mine, grow or pump out of the ground. They do not understand that much of the increase in wealth in the last few years has no relation to physical things but in organization of information. It does not matter that Warren Buffet has so much more than a poor person, what matters is that ALL of our poor have enough to do well and are in fact rich compared to a generation ago. Realization that the size of the pie can be made as large as we need should expand the imaginations of even liberals. If you think that there is simply enough pie for everyone, while the corporations in bed with BushCo simply dip there hands in and take what they want, you're delusioned. If someone greedy enough takes the whole pie, while BushCo defends it, where is there any left for anybody else?? And if you think that our poorest of poor have enough to do well, you are again, delusional. Could you be more specific Kevin and offer some *facts* instead of generalities and assumptions? Hey, Jim, I see that idiot Fritz still has his nose stuck up your ass, or vice versa. Every single thread you post to, Fritz is right there!! Do you two ever uncouple? I am not Jim. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
"*JimH*" wrote in message ... wrote in message oups.com... P Fritz wrote: "*JimH*" wrote in message . .. wrote in message oups.com... wrote: We all agree that Bush seems to have some sort of language dyslexia, however, the obvious concepts make sense. For example, "Make the pie bigger" clearly does not make sense to many liberals who endlessly argue about how to make the pie slices ever so equal but unfortunately ever smaller until most people would starve while some of us argue that the relative sizes dont matter at all, What matters is that the pie is big enough that everybody has enough even though some people manage to get more than others. The idea that teh amount of "wealth" is not fixed comes as a surprise to liberals who seem to really think that wealth somehow is fixed by how much material we mine, grow or pump out of the ground. They do not understand that much of the increase in wealth in the last few years has no relation to physical things but in organization of information. It does not matter that Warren Buffet has so much more than a poor person, what matters is that ALL of our poor have enough to do well and are in fact rich compared to a generation ago. Realization that the size of the pie can be made as large as we need should expand the imaginations of even liberals. If you think that there is simply enough pie for everyone, while the corporations in bed with BushCo simply dip there hands in and take what they want, you're delusioned. If someone greedy enough takes the whole pie, while BushCo defends it, where is there any left for anybody else?? And if you think that our poorest of poor have enough to do well, you are again, delusional. Could you be more specific Kevin and offer some *facts* instead of generalities and assumptions? He can't.............he is suffering from a terminal case of Bush Derangement Syndrome. Awe, how cute, I see Fritz STILL has his nose stuck up your ass!!! So answer the question. Could you be more specific Kevin and offer some *facts* instead of generalities and assumptions? Hell, he cannot even come up with an original response. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
*JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... P Fritz wrote: "*JimH*" wrote in message . .. wrote in message oups.com... wrote: We all agree that Bush seems to have some sort of language dyslexia, however, the obvious concepts make sense. For example, "Make the pie bigger" clearly does not make sense to many liberals who endlessly argue about how to make the pie slices ever so equal but unfortunately ever smaller until most people would starve while some of us argue that the relative sizes dont matter at all, What matters is that the pie is big enough that everybody has enough even though some people manage to get more than others. The idea that teh amount of "wealth" is not fixed comes as a surprise to liberals who seem to really think that wealth somehow is fixed by how much material we mine, grow or pump out of the ground. They do not understand that much of the increase in wealth in the last few years has no relation to physical things but in organization of information. It does not matter that Warren Buffet has so much more than a poor person, what matters is that ALL of our poor have enough to do well and are in fact rich compared to a generation ago. Realization that the size of the pie can be made as large as we need should expand the imaginations of even liberals. If you think that there is simply enough pie for everyone, while the corporations in bed with BushCo simply dip there hands in and take what they want, you're delusioned. If someone greedy enough takes the whole pie, while BushCo defends it, where is there any left for anybody else?? And if you think that our poorest of poor have enough to do well, you are again, delusional. Could you be more specific Kevin and offer some *facts* instead of generalities and assumptions? He can't.............he is suffering from a terminal case of Bush Derangement Syndrome. Awe, how cute, I see Fritz STILL has his nose stuck up your ass!!! So answer the question. Could you be more specific Kevin and offer some *facts* instead of generalities and assumptions? I'm not Kevin, you idiot. But I will answer your question. Yes, I could be more specific and offer some facts insteada of generalities and assumptions. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
*JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... wrote: We all agree that Bush seems to have some sort of language dyslexia, however, the obvious concepts make sense. For example, "Make the pie bigger" clearly does not make sense to many liberals who endlessly argue about how to make the pie slices ever so equal but unfortunately ever smaller until most people would starve while some of us argue that the relative sizes dont matter at all, What matters is that the pie is big enough that everybody has enough even though some people manage to get more than others. The idea that teh amount of "wealth" is not fixed comes as a surprise to liberals who seem to really think that wealth somehow is fixed by how much material we mine, grow or pump out of the ground. They do not understand that much of the increase in wealth in the last few years has no relation to physical things but in organization of information. It does not matter that Warren Buffet has so much more than a poor person, what matters is that ALL of our poor have enough to do well and are in fact rich compared to a generation ago. Realization that the size of the pie can be made as large as we need should expand the imaginations of even liberals. If you think that there is simply enough pie for everyone, while the corporations in bed with BushCo simply dip there hands in and take what they want, you're delusioned. If someone greedy enough takes the whole pie, while BushCo defends it, where is there any left for anybody else?? And if you think that our poorest of poor have enough to do well, you are again, delusional. Could you be more specific Kevin and offer some *facts* instead of generalities and assumptions? Hey, Jim, I see that idiot Fritz still has his nose stuck up your ass, or vice versa. Every single thread you post to, Fritz is right there!! Do you two ever uncouple? I am not Jim. Really, you're not Jim Hertvik, of Avon Lake Ohio?? |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... P Fritz wrote: "*JimH*" wrote in message . .. wrote in message oups.com... wrote: We all agree that Bush seems to have some sort of language dyslexia, however, the obvious concepts make sense. For example, "Make the pie bigger" clearly does not make sense to many liberals who endlessly argue about how to make the pie slices ever so equal but unfortunately ever smaller until most people would starve while some of us argue that the relative sizes dont matter at all, What matters is that the pie is big enough that everybody has enough even though some people manage to get more than others. The idea that teh amount of "wealth" is not fixed comes as a surprise to liberals who seem to really think that wealth somehow is fixed by how much material we mine, grow or pump out of the ground. They do not understand that much of the increase in wealth in the last few years has no relation to physical things but in organization of information. It does not matter that Warren Buffet has so much more than a poor person, what matters is that ALL of our poor have enough to do well and are in fact rich compared to a generation ago. Realization that the size of the pie can be made as large as we need should expand the imaginations of even liberals. If you think that there is simply enough pie for everyone, while the corporations in bed with BushCo simply dip there hands in and take what they want, you're delusioned. If someone greedy enough takes the whole pie, while BushCo defends it, where is there any left for anybody else?? And if you think that our poorest of poor have enough to do well, you are again, delusional. Could you be more specific Kevin and offer some *facts* instead of generalities and assumptions? He can't.............he is suffering from a terminal case of Bush Derangement Syndrome. Awe, how cute, I see Fritz STILL has his nose stuck up your ass!!! So answer the question. Could you be more specific Kevin and offer some *facts* instead of generalities and assumptions? I'm not Kevin, you idiot. But I will answer your question. Yes, I could be more specific and offer some facts insteada of generalities and assumptions. OK, so go ahead. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... wrote: We all agree that Bush seems to have some sort of language dyslexia, however, the obvious concepts make sense. For example, "Make the pie bigger" clearly does not make sense to many liberals who endlessly argue about how to make the pie slices ever so equal but unfortunately ever smaller until most people would starve while some of us argue that the relative sizes dont matter at all, What matters is that the pie is big enough that everybody has enough even though some people manage to get more than others. The idea that teh amount of "wealth" is not fixed comes as a surprise to liberals who seem to really think that wealth somehow is fixed by how much material we mine, grow or pump out of the ground. They do not understand that much of the increase in wealth in the last few years has no relation to physical things but in organization of information. It does not matter that Warren Buffet has so much more than a poor person, what matters is that ALL of our poor have enough to do well and are in fact rich compared to a generation ago. Realization that the size of the pie can be made as large as we need should expand the imaginations of even liberals. If you think that there is simply enough pie for everyone, while the corporations in bed with BushCo simply dip there hands in and take what they want, you're delusioned. If someone greedy enough takes the whole pie, while BushCo defends it, where is there any left for anybody else?? And if you think that our poorest of poor have enough to do well, you are again, delusional. Could you be more specific Kevin and offer some *facts* instead of generalities and assumptions? Hey, Jim, I see that idiot Fritz still has his nose stuck up your ass, or vice versa. Every single thread you post to, Fritz is right there!! Do you two ever uncouple? I am not Jim. Really, you're not Jim Hertvik, of Avon Lake Ohio?? Makes about as much sense as you saying you are not Kevin Noble of Snellville, GA, eh? ;-) |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message oups.com... wrote: It is impossible for anybody to take a pie that is infinitely large. No matter how much any entity takes, the economy can expand for others. But it isn't infinite. There is an exact amount of federal debt, of federal income, of federal spending. All of this contributes to the finite size of the pie. Why is the pie limited by the size of Federal Government? |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
I also do not see a direct relationship between the size of the economy
and the federal budget. Of course liberals think the federal budget IS tthe economy. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:56:31 -0700, dbohara wrote:
I also do not see a direct relationship between the size of the economy and the federal budget. Of course liberals think the federal budget IS tthe economy. You may want to rephrase that. Of course there is a direct relationship between the size of the economy and the federal budget. It's called taxes. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Sailing Cuba | Cruising | |||
| OT - FLIP-FLOPPING MAY HAVE INJURED KERRY’S SHOULDER | General | |||
| Can We STOP IT??? | ASA | |||
Linear Mode
