Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://slate.msn.com//id/2101829/
Reagan said: It is my intention to curb the size and influence of the Federal establishment and to demand recognition of the distinction between the powers granted to the Federal Government and those reserved to the States or to the people. But that didn't happen. As Michael Kinsley has observed, after Reagan's two terms spending by the federal government was one quarter higher, factoring out inflation, than when he got there; the federal civilian workforce had increased from 2.8 million to 3 million; and federal spending, as a share of Gross Domestic Product, had decreased by one percentage point to 21.2 percent. "If Ronald Reagan and his 'Reaganauts' could only slow down the growth of government spending, not reverse it or eliminate wasteful programs, what hope is there for any other conservative president?," complained the conservative Heritage Foundation soon after Reagan left office. The only major government agency Reagan managed to eliminate was the Civil Aeronautics Board, which didn't have much to do after the Carter administration deregulated the airline industry. Fittingly, the Ronald Reagan Building on Pennsylvania, completed ten years after Reagan left office, today houses 5,000 government employees and is the largest government building in Washington. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
RIP=Rest in Peace, eh? Looks like you should follow your own advice.
|
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Federal spending did balloon under Reagan, as it has under every other
president including the present one. When a great man dies, (and while Reagan had his flaws like anybody else he was, in general summary, a credit to humanity), it is fitting to forget about the weaknesses for at least a little while and remember the strengths. Reagan set the bar for presidential decorum and integrity pretty high. None of the D or R presidents since have come close. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
He was an interesting man...and a much better choice than Goldwater. May he
rest in peace. Jim "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Federal spending did balloon under Reagan, as it has under every other president including the present one. When a great man dies, (and while Reagan had his flaws like anybody else he was, in general summary, a credit to humanity), it is fitting to forget about the weaknesses for at least a little while and remember the strengths. Reagan set the bar for presidential decorum and integrity pretty high. None of the D or R presidents since have come close. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "NOYB" wrote in message ... RIP=Rest in Peace, eh? Looks like you should follow your own advice. He was basically a good man, and an actor manipulated by others in his party. He suffered long. I wish him final peace, His record will speak for itself as the future unfolds' " The evil that men do lives after them;The good is oft interred with their bones." William Shakespeare |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is the kind of thing a decent person would post about Reagan on the day
of his death: "In closing let me thank you, the American people, for giving me the great honor of allowing me to serve as your president. When the Lord calls me home, whenever that may be, I will leave with the greatest love for this country of ours and eternal optimism for its future. I now begin the journey that will lead me into the sunset of my life. I know that for America there will always be a bright dawn ahead." - Ronald Reagan, Nov. 5, 1994 |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message ... RIP=Rest in Peace, eh? Looks like you should follow your own advice. He was basically a good man, and an actor manipulated by others in his party. He suffered long. I wish him final peace, His record will speak for itself as the future unfolds' " The evil that men do lives after them;The good is oft interred with their bones." William Shakespeare Once in a while, more often than not, Reagan could do a good job delivering a speech someone else wrote. I had the privilege of hearing him speak in person several times at Washington lunches and dinners, and he did a good to excellent job with simple prepared remarks. In the Q&As, he was a little better than Dubya is at extemporaneous speaking, which is not saying much. I was never a fan of Reagan, and not because of his politics, because there are a few Republicans, even conservatives, of the last century I do admire. He spent us into oblivion and left it to others to pay the bills for his excesses. He wasn't much of an inspiration for his children, none of whom, I believe, finished college, and several of which have commented publicly on his relationships with them. Of course, he had a rough childhood himself. But I suppose that is neither here nor there. He did, obviously, have a good relationship with his second wife, a great relationship. I simply never found much about Reagan as POTUS to admire. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 00:47:01 GMT, "Jim" wrote:
Reagan said: Anyone remember who was president when the Hunt brothers were bailed out after trying to corner the silver market? bb |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's like saying it's better to eat moldy vegetables than rotted meat.
"Jim Donohue" wrote in message news:fPuwc.22427$lL1.20957@fed1read03... He was an interesting man...and a much better choice than Goldwater. May he rest in peace. Jim "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Federal spending did balloon under Reagan, as it has under every other president including the present one. When a great man dies, (and while Reagan had his flaws like anybody else he was, in general summary, a credit to humanity), it is fitting to forget about the weaknesses for at least a little while and remember the strengths. Reagan set the bar for presidential decorum and integrity pretty high. None of the D or R presidents since have come close. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gould 0738 wrote:
Reagan set the bar for presidential decorum and integrity pretty high. None of the D or R presidents since have come close. I agree. Reagan did a great service by restoring dignity & respect (a seperate thing from integrity, which wasn't really one of RR's strong points) to the Presidency after Nixon destroyed it. Certainly no President in my lifetime (ie since Eisenhower) has had his presence & decorum. OTOH the profession of publishing humiliating pictures & personal details has accelerated and grown more profitable every year, so it is more difficult to achieve any sense of dignity of office. DSK |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ronald Reagan | General | |||
O.T. A different perspective | General |