Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #2   Report Post  
John Gaquin
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links


"basskisser" wrote in message

Simple, really. I think that most people of average intelligence would
be able to figure out what a "neocon wanna-be" is.


So, then ....... who explained it all to you?


  #3   Report Post  
basskisser
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links

"John Gaquin" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message

Simple, really. I think that most people of average intelligence would
be able to figure out what a "neocon wanna-be" is.


So, then ....... who explained it all to you?


Ah, the village idiot pops up, as usual. Jeez, don't even need bait
with you, just snag you out of the water.
  #4   Report Post  
Harry Krause
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in theteeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links

basskisser wrote:

"John Gaquin" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message

Simple, really. I think that most people of average intelligence would
be able to figure out what a "neocon wanna-be" is.


So, then ....... who explained it all to you?


Ah, the village idiot pops up, as usual. Jeez, don't even need bait
with you, just snag you out of the water.


Just a minute there, fella. There are lots of village idiots on the
right here...I would be hard-pressed to select one as *the* village
idiot! Gawkin is in the pack, though, no doubt about it.
  #5   Report Post  
John Gaquin
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links


"Harry Krause" wrote in message

Just a minute there, fella.


LOL

You guys run a marvelous MAS. keep it up -- it's all you've got left.




  #6   Report Post  
John Gaquin
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links


"basskisser" wrote in message

Don't evade the issue -- answer the question. If it requires average
intelligence to be able to figure out what a "neocon wanna-be" is, who
explained it all to you? Harry? Hehehe


  #7   Report Post  
Dave Hall
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links

On 21 Jun 2004 11:01:07 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Cap) wrote in message
Ahhh.. name calling. The last bastion of the intellectually inferior.
The final argument for the wiseguy without an arguement.

"Neocon wanna-be"... Perhaps you could enlighten me as to what EXACTLY
a neocon wanna-be really is?


Neo- meaning *new*
con- short for *conservative
wanna-be- slang for someone who *wants to be*.

So, neocon is short for *new conservative*,


So, judging from your definition, a "new" conservative is someone who
used to be something else but is now conservative. Since the
ideological opposite of conservative is liberal, then following that
logic, the conclusion can be drawn that a "new" conservative is most
likely an "old" liberal. A former liberal who now, after having to
move out of their parent's house, getting a job of their own,
starting a family, and realizing how the world really works, has now
matured and come to the realization that liberal idealism is a joke,
which tries to force equality where it can't exist naturally.
Consequently, their viewpoint have changed to embrace what traditional
conservative values are.

So a "neo conservative" is a liberal convert. Seems to be a lot of
those lately. Liberalism is having a tough time holding on to people
over the age of 30. Unless, of course, they haven't yet achieved
anything, and still look to the government for "help"......

Dave
  #8   Report Post  
Gould 0738
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links

FASCINATING DEMONSTRATION

of conservbative logic.

1. Make an assumption
2. Declare you own assumption "true"
2. (a) Make additional assumptions that rely on the truth of the previous
assumption.
3. Decide your newly discovered truth is holy writ and become self righteous in
its promulgation.

Thanks for sharing!

Dave Hall wrote:

So, judging from your definition, a "new" conservative is someone who
used to be something else but is now conservative. Since the
ideological opposite of conservative is liberal, then following that
logic, the conclusion can be drawn that a "new" conservative is most
likely an "old" liberal. A former liberal who now, after having to
move out of their parent's house, getting a job of their own,
starting a family, and realizing how the world really works, has now
matured and come to the realization that liberal idealism is a joke,
which tries to force equality where it can't exist naturally.
Consequently, their viewpoint have changed to embrace what traditional
conservative values are.

So a "neo conservative" is a liberal convert. Seems to be a lot of
those lately. Liberalism is having a tough time holding on to people
over the age of 30. Unless, of course, they haven't yet achieved
anything, and still look to the government for "help"......

Dave








  #9   Report Post  
Harry Krause
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in theteeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links

Gould 0738 wrote:
FASCINATING DEMONSTRATION

of conservbative logic.

1. Make an assumption
2. Declare you own assumption "true"
2. (a) Make additional assumptions that rely on the truth of the previous
assumption.
3. Decide your newly discovered truth is holy writ and become self righteous in
its promulgation.

Thanks for sharing!


Indeed, this is what I enjoy most about the "cons" here...and why I
rarely bother to correct their "mis-assumptions." It's fun to watch them.
  #10   Report Post  
John H
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links

On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:42:25 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:

Gould 0738 wrote:
FASCINATING DEMONSTRATION

of conservbative logic.

1. Make an assumption
2. Declare you own assumption "true"
2. (a) Make additional assumptions that rely on the truth of the previous
assumption.
3. Decide your newly discovered truth is holy writ and become self righteous in
its promulgation.

Thanks for sharing!


Indeed, this is what I enjoy most about the "cons" here...and why I
rarely bother to correct their "mis-assumptions." It's fun to watch them.


Saw a pretty sight when I went to Breezy Point to visit my buddy on the Linda J.
Just inside the gate, on the right, on a trailer, was a Parker 2520XL named the
"Yo Ho." Don't know if it's yours or not, but it looks much like it. Parked
where it is, it's going to collect a lot of dust from the limestone and clay as
people drive around there. I'd be tempted to put it further away from the main
drag.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017