"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
"W.T. Hatch" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:09:44 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:

[elided]

Serious question.
Why are you people so high on Hillary? She has never shown leadership
ability. Was a 2nd rate, forgetful attorney. Could not keep her
husband
under any sort of marital control.

Sir:

I must ask: is "marital control" your preferred model of a life
partnership?

Curious notion.

Most sincerely,
W.T. Hatch

I think it falls into the same category as "She couldn't keep her man"
or
"He couldn't keep his woman" - that sort of bull****.



Maybe Binary Bill has one of those old-fashioned Republican marriages,
where, if his wife doesn't adhere to his standards, he beats the crap
out of her.

Do not judge the rest of us, by your standards.

"W.T. Hatch" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:09:44 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:

[elided]

Serious question.
Why are you people so high on Hillary? She has never shown leadership
ability. Was a 2nd rate, forgetful attorney. Could not keep her husband
under any sort of marital control.

Sir:

I must ask: is "marital control" your preferred model of a life
partnership?

Curious notion.

Most sincerely,
W.T. Hatch

There are great females available as
candidates. A lot more qualified than Hillary. So why Hillary?
California
has 2 female senators. Feinstein is a lot sharper and more qualified.
Now
Boxer is a different story. IMO not qualified to be a city council
person.


Well, most of the successful marriages are a partnership. Some control in
just respect and actions. Even Bill did not respect Hillary.

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
"W.T. Hatch" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:09:44 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:

[elided]

Serious question.
Why are you people so high on Hillary? She has never shown
leadership
ability. Was a 2nd rate, forgetful attorney. Could not keep her
husband
under any sort of marital control.

Sir:

I must ask: is "marital control" your preferred model of a life
partnership?

Curious notion.

Most sincerely,
W.T. Hatch

I think it falls into the same category as "She couldn't keep her man"
or
"He couldn't keep his woman" - that sort of bull****.



Maybe Binary Bill has one of those old-fashioned Republican marriages,
where, if his wife doesn't adhere to his standards, he beats the crap
out of her.

Do not judge the rest of us, by your standards.



Believe, me. we Dont',. ()

I don't know if Harry would beat his wife, but if she doesn't live up to his
standards he does "make up" a wife who does. I still can't believe he is so
embarrassed about his wife being a social worker that he would tell everyone
she is a doctor doctor.


"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
"W.T. Hatch" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:09:44 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:

[elided]

Serious question.
Why are you people so high on Hillary? She has never shown
leadership
ability. Was a 2nd rate, forgetful attorney. Could not keep her
husband
under any sort of marital control.

Sir:

I must ask: is "marital control" your preferred model of a life
partnership?

Curious notion.

Most sincerely,
W.T. Hatch

I think it falls into the same category as "She couldn't keep her man"
or
"He couldn't keep his woman" - that sort of bull****.



Maybe Binary Bill has one of those old-fashioned Republican marriages,
where, if his wife doesn't adhere to his standards, he beats the crap
out of her.

Do not judge the rest of us, by your standards.

On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:39:44 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"W.T. Hatch" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:09:44 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:

[elided]

Serious question.
Why are you people so high on Hillary? She has never shown leadership
ability. Was a 2nd rate, forgetful attorney. Could not keep her husband
under any sort of marital control.

Sir:

I must ask: is "marital control" your preferred model of a life
partnership?

Curious notion.

Most sincerely,
W.T. Hatch

There are great females available as
candidates. A lot more qualified than Hillary. So why Hillary?
California
has 2 female senators. Feinstein is a lot sharper and more qualified.
Now
Boxer is a different story. IMO not qualified to be a city council
person.


Well, most of the successful marriages are a partnership. Some control in
just respect and actions.

Sir:

I would never think to argue the "partnership" aspect of marriages. But do you
truly equate "respect" and "control?" Curiouser yet.

Even Bill did not respect Hillary.

You have no way of knowing the true nature of their relationship. No one does,
other than the principals.

Most sincerely,
W.T. Hatch

"John Smith" wrote in message news:74iHc.47509$XM6.16467@attbi_s53...
I don't know if Harry would beat his wife, but if she doesn't live up to his
standards he does "make up" a wife who does. I still can't believe he is so
embarrassed about his wife being a social worker that he would tell everyone
she is a doctor doctor.

Of course you can't believe it. No more than anyone else can. Perhaps
its because it's nothing more than a mere allegation, and not a proven
fact?

"W.T. Hatch" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:39:44 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:

"W.T. Hatch" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:09:44 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:

[elided]

Serious question.
Why are you people so high on Hillary? She has never shown leadership
ability. Was a 2nd rate, forgetful attorney. Could not keep her
husband
under any sort of marital control.

Sir:

I must ask: is "marital control" your preferred model of a life
partnership?

Curious notion.

Most sincerely,
W.T. Hatch

There are great females available as
candidates. A lot more qualified than Hillary. So why Hillary?
California
has 2 female senators. Feinstein is a lot sharper and more qualified.
Now
Boxer is a different story. IMO not qualified to be a city council
person.


Well, most of the successful marriages are a partnership. Some control
in
just respect and actions.

Sir:

I would never think to argue the "partnership" aspect of marriages. But
do you
truly equate "respect" and "control?" Curiouser yet.

Even Bill did not respect Hillary.

You have no way of knowing the true nature of their relationship. No one
does,
other than the principals.

Most sincerely,
W.T. Hatch


To repeat a thread of yours. What does this have to do with boats. If Bill
had any respect for Hillary, he would not be diddling the interns.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
"W.T. Hatch" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:09:44 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:

[elided]

Serious question.
Why are you people so high on Hillary? She has never shown
leadership
ability. Was a 2nd rate, forgetful attorney. Could not keep her
husband
under any sort of marital control.

Sir:

I must ask: is "marital control" your preferred model of a life
partnership?

Curious notion.

Most sincerely,
W.T. Hatch

I think it falls into the same category as "She couldn't keep her
man"
or
"He couldn't keep his woman" - that sort of bull****.



Maybe Binary Bill has one of those old-fashioned Republican marriages,
where, if his wife doesn't adhere to his standards, he beats the crap
out of her.

Do not judge the rest of us, by your standards.



Believe, me. we Dont',. ()



Actually you and Harry, judge others strickly by your own standards. If you
can profit from others, then they are OK. Sound like your standard?

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
k.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
"W.T. Hatch" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:09:44 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:

[elided]

Serious question.
Why are you people so high on Hillary? She has never shown
leadership
ability. Was a 2nd rate, forgetful attorney. Could not keep her
husband
under any sort of marital control.

Sir:

I must ask: is "marital control" your preferred model of a life
partnership?

Curious notion.

Most sincerely,
W.T. Hatch

I think it falls into the same category as "She couldn't keep her
man"
or
"He couldn't keep his woman" - that sort of bull****.



Maybe Binary Bill has one of those old-fashioned Republican
marriages,
where, if his wife doesn't adhere to his standards, he beats the
crap
out of her.

Do not judge the rest of us, by your standards.



Believe, me. we Dont',. ()



Actually you and Harry, judge others strickly by your own standards. If
you
can profit from others, then they are OK. Sound like your standard?



I judge you according to those used to determine whether 8th graders meet
current literacy requirements in NY State. You sometimes contribute
something of value with regard to boating questions, otherwise I'd be using
5th grade standards.

Hey....you asked. :-)

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
k.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
"W.T. Hatch" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:09:44 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:

[elided]

Serious question.
Why are you people so high on Hillary? She has never shown
leadership
ability. Was a 2nd rate, forgetful attorney. Could not keep
her
husband
under any sort of marital control.

Sir:

I must ask: is "marital control" your preferred model of a life
partnership?

Curious notion.

Most sincerely,
W.T. Hatch

I think it falls into the same category as "She couldn't keep
her
man"
or
"He couldn't keep his woman" - that sort of bull****.



Maybe Binary Bill has one of those old-fashioned Republican
marriages,
where, if his wife doesn't adhere to his standards, he beats the
crap
out of her.

Do not judge the rest of us, by your standards.



Believe, me. we Dont',. ()



Actually you and Harry, judge others strickly by your own standards. If
you
can profit from others, then they are OK. Sound like your standard?



I judge you according to those used to determine whether 8th graders meet
current literacy requirements in NY State. You sometimes contribute
something of value with regard to boating questions, otherwise I'd be
using
5th grade standards.

Hey....you asked. :-)



You still in 4th grade?