Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() REPORT IGNORES CONTROVERSIAL PROVISIONS: The report (http://www.lifeandliberty.gov/docs/0..._the_field.pdf) entirely avoids some of the most controversial sections of the Patriot Act. Specifically, there is no mention of Section 213 (which permits "sneak-and-peak" searches and seizures), Section 215 (which allows the government to seize any tangible thing from any person pursuant to a terrorist investigation) Comment Like maybe a boat?and Section 505 (which allows the Justice Department to compel the production of documents). With other controversial provisions, such Section 214 (which eased restrictions on wiretaps for non-terrorists), the report praises the value of the provisions but provides no information as to how or how often they have been used. Likewise, there is no actual information about how Section 206 (which permits vague authorizations for wiretaps) is being used -- but the Justice Department does helpfully provide a hypothetical example of how it might be used. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim wrote:
REPORT IGNORES CONTROVERSIAL PROVISIONS: The report (http://www.lifeandliberty.gov/docs/0..._the_field.pdf) entirely avoids some of the most controversial sections of the Patriot Act. Specifically, there is no mention of Section 213 (which permits "sneak-and-peak" searches and seizures), Section 215 (which allows the government to seize any tangible thing from any person pursuant to a terrorist investigation) Comment Like maybe a boat?and Section 505 (which allows the Justice Department to compel the production of documents). With other controversial provisions, such Section 214 (which eased restrictions on wiretaps for non-terrorists), the report praises the value of the provisions but provides no information as to how or how often they have been used. Likewise, there is no actual information about how Section 206 (which permits vague authorizations for wiretaps) is being used -- but the Justice Department does helpfully provide a hypothetical example of how it might be used. There's little question the GOP is the party of Big Brother. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|