Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
your name says it all.
"Ignoramus14603" wrote in message ... In article , leon skunkers wrote: ...why the hell we invaded Iraq? I'll admit I can't come up with anything that makes sense. My guess is, as to what went behind the closed doors, is that there were two reasons: 1. Steal Iraqi oil and enrich Haliburton, etc, and lower oil prices in time for the next election. The old "liebensraum" (living space) concept. 2. Occupy Iraq and use it as a fixed aircraft carrier in the quest for world dominance. The thinking goes, occupying Iraq, it will be easier to get Saudis or Iran or whatever other nation might be "next". Unfortunately, it turns out that the Iraqis are not eager to pump out their oil to enrich us, and also that instead of a good platform for a conquest, Iraq consumed much of the US military manpower to the point that it is much harder to mount more victorious blitzkriegs elsewhere. i |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ain't it the truth...
Bill Andersen wrote: your name says it all. "Ignoramus14603" wrote in message ... In article , leon skunkers wrote: ...why the hell we invaded Iraq? I'll admit I can't come up with anything that makes sense. My guess is, as to what went behind the closed doors, is that there were two reasons: 1. Steal Iraqi oil and enrich Haliburton, etc, and lower oil prices in time for the next election. The old "liebensraum" (living space) concept. 2. Occupy Iraq and use it as a fixed aircraft carrier in the quest for world dominance. The thinking goes, occupying Iraq, it will be easier to get Saudis or Iran or whatever other nation might be "next". Unfortunately, it turns out that the Iraqis are not eager to pump out their oil to enrich us, and also that instead of a good platform for a conquest, Iraq consumed much of the US military manpower to the point that it is much harder to mount more victorious blitzkriegs elsewhere. i |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 08:24:39 -0700, "Bill Andersen"
wrote: your name says it all. came up with the most plausible answer so far. And your response to it says a ****load about you. "Ignoramus14603" wrote in message ... In article , leon skunkers wrote: ...why the hell we invaded Iraq? I'll admit I can't come up with anything that makes sense. My guess is, as to what went behind the closed doors, is that there were two reasons: 1. Steal Iraqi oil and enrich Haliburton, etc, and lower oil prices in time for the next election. The old "liebensraum" (living space) concept. 2. Occupy Iraq and use it as a fixed aircraft carrier in the quest for world dominance. The thinking goes, occupying Iraq, it will be easier to get Saudis or Iran or whatever other nation might be "next". Unfortunately, it turns out that the Iraqis are not eager to pump out their oil to enrich us, and also that instead of a good platform for a conquest, Iraq consumed much of the US military manpower to the point that it is much harder to mount more victorious blitzkriegs elsewhere. i |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 15:35:45 GMT, "Bill"
wrote: Ain't it the truth... awwww... ain't this CUTE? Bill Andersen wrote: your name says it all. "Ignoramus14603" wrote in message ... In article , leon skunkers wrote: ...why the hell we invaded Iraq? I'll admit I can't come up with anything that makes sense. My guess is, as to what went behind the closed doors, is that there were two reasons: 1. Steal Iraqi oil and enrich Haliburton, etc, and lower oil prices in time for the next election. The old "liebensraum" (living space) concept. 2. Occupy Iraq and use it as a fixed aircraft carrier in the quest for world dominance. The thinking goes, occupying Iraq, it will be easier to get Saudis or Iran or whatever other nation might be "next". Unfortunately, it turns out that the Iraqis are not eager to pump out their oil to enrich us, and also that instead of a good platform for a conquest, Iraq consumed much of the US military manpower to the point that it is much harder to mount more victorious blitzkriegs elsewhere. i |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Carolyn Louise leigh" wrote in message ... No Brainer! OIL. Toss out all the smoke and mirrors. Every argument GWB made for War with Iraq was an echo of the 60's. My how short memories become.... ![]() Operation Iraqi Liberation = OIL Oh, wait, we better not call it that... |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 14:18:44 -0400, "Carolyn Louise leigh"
wrote: No Brainer! OIL. Toss out all the smoke and mirrors. Every argument GWB made for War with Iraq was an echo of the 60's. My how short memories become.... ![]() Cites? Gunner "Bill Andersen" wrote in message news:zfPYa.38725$Bp2.38211@fed1read07... your name says it all. "Ignoramus14603" wrote in message ... In article , leon skunkers wrote: ...why the hell we invaded Iraq? I'll admit I can't come up with anything that makes sense. My guess is, as to what went behind the closed doors, is that there were two reasons: 1. Steal Iraqi oil and enrich Haliburton, etc, and lower oil prices in time for the next election. The old "liebensraum" (living space) concept. 2. Occupy Iraq and use it as a fixed aircraft carrier in the quest for world dominance. The thinking goes, occupying Iraq, it will be easier to get Saudis or Iran or whatever other nation might be "next". Unfortunately, it turns out that the Iraqis are not eager to pump out their oil to enrich us, and also that instead of a good platform for a conquest, Iraq consumed much of the US military manpower to the point that it is much harder to mount more victorious blitzkriegs elsewhere. i "What do you call someone in possesion of all the facts? Paranoid.-William Burroughs |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cites?
Gunner You'll have to do your own research, but it shouldn't be hard to find Robt. McNamara's admission that the Gulf of Tonkin incident was staged to persuade a reluctant US Congress to authorize a Texas President to escalate the war in Viet Nam. Then, as now, the Haliburton/Brown and Root cartel got filthy rich as a result. Filthy. Don't misinterpret- I'm not stating that 9-11 was staged. But the invasion of Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11. Even the White House admits that plans for invading Iraq were well under way in May of 2001, several months *before* 9-11. (The specific charges of WMD and the implications of a nuclear arsenal *are* fairly similar to the Gulf of Tonkin "incident.") |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
leon skunkers wrote:
talk about idiotic trolling. Yeah, I know. I replied to her bull**** so I guess you have a point in calling her a troll. Now back to you, idiot? ral blaaarg. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gunner wrote:
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 14:18:44 -0400, "Carolyn Louise leigh" wrote: No Brainer! OIL. Toss out all the smoke and mirrors. Every argument GWB made for War with Iraq was an echo of the 60's. My how short memories become.... ![]() Cites? Gunner Good grief...when did Gunner get released from the state hospital at Chattahootchee? -- * * * email sent to will *never* get to me. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|